评《解读河汾诸老》

刘达科解读《河汾诸老》选取了一个与金元之际文坛有密切而广泛联系的作家群体进行研究,对其文化活动、创作成就和历史地位作了全方位的考察和阐述,在资料钩沉发微、史实考订索隐和作品研读诠释方面也颇有独见,并时已当代域外的研究方法和观点来阐述、解释中国文学史现象,反映了该学术领域的前沿水平。     

论汉代文献整理的思想和方法

两汉文献整理思想,主要有求真的文献整理态度、博通的文献观、系统的文献考辨思想、成型的文献解释模式和传统文献学思想的发展。汉代发展和创新了文献辨伪、版本、校勘、注释、标点、翻译、目录等方法。这些方法互相影响,互相促进,使文献学方法构成一个有机的整体,建构起文献学的基本框架。作为体系的文献学,在汉代已经形成。     

数字人文视角:基于符号分析法的宋代政治网络可视化研究

数字人文的兴起引发了社会人文历史领域的广泛关注,海量的数据资源与新兴的数据分析技术为更高效和宏观地解决人文研究中长期存疑和讨论的主题提供了全新的思维范式。尽管有关数字人文的合理性仍存在诸多争议,但是数据驱动下的跨领域人文计算在人文主义重构活动深度与广度上所展现出的高效性已经被大量项目与实践所证明。本文以宋代政治为例,从数字人文视角出发,借助符号分析方法对哈佛大学“中国历代人物资料库”进行实证探索与可视化分析,结合已有的史学问题和相关观点,从宋代政治整体网络分布特征、核心人物的地位与结构拓扑以及不同时期宋代政治网络的时序政治关系演化模式三个层次,进行逐一分析与讨论,为研究宋代党争政治格局提供了一种新的思考方式,同时也展现了数字人文技术在人文历史领域研究中的可行性与巨大潜能。图8。表5。参考文献40。     

郭沫若早期诗学与与西方文艺美学思潮（二题）

文章运用比较诗学的方法，对郭沫若早期诗学与弗洛伊德精神分析美论和柏格森生命美学的影响／接受关系进行了讨论。文章认为，郭沫若早期对这两种思潮的接受都不是照单全收的，由于时代(现实)与文化传统的制约，再加上西方不同思潮的交叉影响，这两种思潮在郭沫若那里均已发生了这样那样的改变，这种改变隐含了诗学建构的某些规律性现象。文章以郭沫若早期对上述两种思潮的接受为个案，探讨的其实是一种新型诗学何以建构的问题。     

清代前期的嵩山文人群体初探

清代前期,嵩山一带出现了一个极有成就的文人群体。其成员前后相继,贯穿顺治至乾隆四世,历时一百余年,可考者达数十人。他们的创作在弘扬地域文化传统与文学精神的同时,又能跳出地域与传统的窠臼,具有一定的包容性与创新性,呈现出中原文化博大恢弘的气象。     

Exploring Developmental Appropriateness of Multitouch Tables in Prekindergarten: A Video Analysis

This study explored how developmentally appropriate practices influenced the affordances of a multitouch surface in an early childhood classroom. Children, ages 4 to 5 years old, were videotaped while engaged in a storymaking application on a multitouch table. As a result of the study, we found that some challenges with the functionality undermined children's autonomous control. The researchers observed numerous instances of issues with control of the medium, including height of the table, sensitivity to multiple types of touch, and limited instructions and prompts. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.     

Children's responses to the interactivity of storybook apps in family shared reading events involving the iPad

This paper reports on some data on the effects of screen‐based interactivity on children's engagement with storybook apps during family shared book reading that were gathered in a 2‐year, small‐scale ethnographic case study in Spain. Data analysis focuses on the complex interplay between the storybook app's interactive features and the children's responses to them. Our findings show that interactive elements increase the child's autonomy, as they tend to promote the importance of the reader, positioning him or her as a collaborator, storyteller, an author or an internal character in the fiction; something that can materialise in exciting narrative strategies that can trigger powerful responses to digital literary texts in emergent readers, including playing, creating new fictions or engaging emotionally with the story. Finally, we argue that the Reader Response models that have been used over recent decades to understand children's reading experiences with storybooks need to be revised to better understand their current experiences with interactive texts.     

“盛唐气象”与盛唐边塞诗

盛唐边塞诗歌是盛唐文学积极进取精神的唯一承担者,它的繁荣在于边塞诗人的入边、游边和使边,其外敛的意识是儒家＂兼济天下＂胸怀的完美演绎。盛唐边塞诗更能反映、体现出＂盛唐气象＂的方方面面。     

Is Reading Recovery sustainable two to four years after discontinuation?

The Reading Recovery programme has been a key early literacy intervention in many international contexts for over two decades. As a consequence, there have been numerous investigations into its efficacy for short-term gains, but only a few on long-term sustainability. This study examines the progress of 95 Year 4–6 students from seven schools in the rural hinterland of New Zealand. Standardised data were collected from students who had been successfully discontinued from Reading Recovery two to four years previously and compared them with mean performance from the same school populations. Results showed that only Year 6 students obtained the mean scores which placed them within the national average range. Our results also showed that whilst almost half of the ex-Reading Recovery students we studied, fell within the average band, 45% were classified as well below average.     

Assessment in special schools: national early assessment procedures and pupils attending special schools in England

An implicit assumption that fostering inclusion means having shared systems encompassing the needs of all children is evident in many aspects of policy development over the past decade. Reflecting this, the implementation of ‘baseline assessment’ schemes (i.e. testing at around age 5 years) is a statutory requirement on all state-maintained special and mainstream schools in England since 1998. Our argument is that the enthusiasm for commonality has obscured the need to question the value and validity of baseline assessment schemes for children with special educational needs (and possibly some others such as children having English as an additional language). We illustrate this position with reference to data from our recent study on baseline assessment in England. The study encompassed survey data from a national sample of 982 schools, of which 107 were special schools. Between them, these special schools used 42 different baseline assessment schemes. Comparisons between our mainstream and special school respondents indicated that there were similarities in the nature and perceived value of the schemes used. However, special schools were less satisfied with their schemes. We suggest that a reappraisal of the nature and purpose of baseline assessment for pupils with special educational needs warrants greater critical debate. Without this, there is a danger that a stress on commonality, veiling an inclusion orthodoxy, will ultimately be counterproductive.