高校科技创新呼唤科技体制改革

本文论述了科学研究在高校中的作用,以及科技体制改革与高校学科专业建设的关系。在高等教育中,科学研究是一所高校人才培养的依托,是学科专业发展的支撑,亦是其实力的具体体现。针对科技体制改革的目的,原则提出人事分配制度改革是高校科技体制改革的突破口,并对科技界存在的若干问题进行了剖析,指出科技体制改革、科学技术健康发展必须弘扬科学精神和优化科技环境。     

结合专业特色应用现代教育技术服务于中小学教学

现代教育技术的应用,深刻影响高中小学各科教学.传统的教学模式必须与现代教育技术进行整合,才能适应新课程教学改革的需要.充分发挥教育技术专业人才的主导作用,担当教育技术现代化的排头兵.     

毛泽东、邓小平、江泽民三代领导人关于我国教育方针的哲学理念探析

新中国成立以来，我国的教育方针是在毛泽东、邓小平、江泽民三代领导人亲自关心领导下提出、确立、发展和不断完善的。同时，三代领导人对教育方针的理念都有各自新的创意和不同的哲学思考。     

立足于“关系”的教育研究

教育现象是复杂的,我们从复杂性思想、现代哲学、思维方式等方面入手,把教育世界还原到教育中的事件与关系,使教育中的关系成为我们进行教育研究的基本出发点。教育研究应关注教育中的关系:就教育活动本身而言,应关注教育场域;就教育研究者而言,应持一种介入的态度;就教育学科而言,应努力跨越边界,实现学科之间的穿梭。     

研究性学习在高职美术教学中的实践

本文针对高职教育美术教学的现状,探讨了研究性学习在美术教学中的实施策略和操作方法,证明了研究性学习在美术教学中具有增强学生合作精神、促进学生自主性学习、培养学生创新精神和实践能力等实际功效。     

坚持以人为本的科学发展观推进新世纪高校成人高等教育现代化

从新世纪开始,我国已进入加快推进社会主义现代化的新的历史阶段.迈入新世纪新阶段的普通高等学校(以下简称高校)成人高等教育如何更好地适应社会主义现代化建设的新需求,抓住新机遇,迎接新挑战,重要的是坚持以人为本的科学发展观,适应时代发展需要,全方位确立高校成人高等教育现代化的战略目标;加大改革创新力度,全方位推进高校成人高等教育现代化.     

广西师范大学职教专硕职业能力培养现状调查

为全面深入了解全日制职教专硕职业能力的培养现状,采用问卷分析法对广西师范大学职业技术师范学院2016级、2017级全日制职业技术教育专业研究生进行调查研究。调查分别从职业知识、职业技能、研发能力、综合应用能力四个方面提出问题,并对调查结果进行了细致分析,探究了当前职教专硕职业能力培养存在的利与弊,为进一步提高职教专硕职业能力培养质量提供参考和借鉴。     

Enacting Informal Science Learning: Exploring the Battle for Informal Learning

Informal Science Learning (ISL) is a policy narrative of interest in the United Kingdom and abroad. This paper explores how a group of English secondary school science teachers, enacted ISL science clubs through employing the Periodic Table of Videos. It examines how these teachers ‘battled’ to enact ISL policy in performative conditions at the micro-scale, and how this battle reflected macro-scale epistemological and political considerations. Data from the study suggests that for some, ISL was low stakes as it was seen to have negligible impact upon performance data. As a result, there was some resistance towards enacting ISL and conflict between the formal and informal curriculum processes. Nonetheless, analysis indicates that the informants highly valued ISL despite the requirement for them to justify it over more formal and ‘effective’ approaches to learning science.     

The scholarship of teaching: A comparison of conceptions held by experts and regular academic staff

Over the past decade the scholarship ofteaching has received considerable attention inthe higher education literature as a reactionto the widely cited Carnegie Foundation'sreport ``Scholarship Reconsidered'; however, theconcept has remained devoid of a unifieddefinition. A recent Delphi study conductedwith a selective group of scholars whoseexpertise lies in the area of universityteaching and learning indicated the extent towhich these ``experts' agreed with each other onimportant features and unresolved issues theyassociate with the scholarship of teaching. Building on the results of the Delphi study,the present article discusses the results of asecond survey comparing these ``experts' 'conceptions with those of a larger group ofscholars whose expertise lies in a differentacademic field (``regular academic staff'), inorder to identify the similarities anddifferences in the conceptions of thescholarship of teaching held by each of the twogroups. While regular academic staff werefound to associate the scholarship of teachingmore with good or effectiveteaching ``experts' pointed to notions such aspeer review and scholarly standards. Thediscussion of the results focuses on the notionof consensus reached within and betweenthe two groups. It is argued that in order topromote changes in policy with respect to whatis to count as scholarship, identifying andreporting ``experts' ' conceptions, thoughclearly necessary for promoting moreenlightened discussions on the issue, willremain insufficient. Policy change in academeis more likely to ensue as a result of thewider academic community reaching consensus onthe meaning, and nature, of the scholarship ofteaching. The wider academic community includes``experts', as well as colleagues in departmentsand disciplinary associations. The articleconcludes by exploring the notion of consensusthrough the lens of critical social theory.     

Channel One Revisited: Prospective Teachers and the Role of American Higher Education

This study examined perceptions of college of education students and their experiences with Channel One, a privately-owned news service used in public education. Given that about one-third of middle and high schoolers in the US view the broadcast every school day, the authors surveyed 172 freshmen to discern their views and attitudes toward Channel One programming and commercials and the role colleges and universities might play in relation to this media service. While most studies on Channel One have been conducted from a K-12 point of view, the goal of this study was to reconsider the topic from the perspective of prospective teachers and post-secondary education. A. J. Angulo  is Assistant Professor of Social Foundations, Winthrop University. He received an Ed.D. and Ed.M. from Harvard University. His research interests include history of education, technology and education, and student rights. Susan K. Green  is Associate Professor of Educational Psychology, Winthrop University. She received a Ph.D. in social psychology from Loyola University, Chicago and a Ph.D. in educational psychology and research from the University of South Carolina, Columbia. Her interests include classroom assessment, motivational and instructional strategies to promote learning, and multicultural issues in education.