死亡标准刍议

通过对死亡态度和死亡标准历史演变的探讨，阐明了随着人类理性的觉醒，人类对自己的本质认识不断深入，越来越理性地面对死亡。     

法社会学视角下安乐死犯罪化研究——兼论生命权绝对化的理论误区

安乐死是一个涉及诸学科多领域的复杂命题。无论是学界还是政界,关于实施安乐死是否构成犯罪的争论一直没有停止。因为安乐死问题的多学科交叉性,所以在讨论其能否罪化时,运用法社会学的研究方法来进行分析,或许可以更为全面地解决安乐死问题所涉及的法学难题。     

对荷兰实施安乐死法的伦理思考

安乐死是生命伦理学的一个热门话题，它涉及立法、社会道德、伦理、宗教信仰、人权等各个方面。荷兰为安乐死立法，标志着人类在死亡方法上有了自主的选择权，反映了人类认识能力和水平的历史性进步。荷兰把安乐死合法化，对我国的安乐死立法具有重要的借鉴意义。     

安乐死刑法解读

安乐死是一个争议已久的问题,一直困扰着理论界和司法界。文章拟从刑法学角度,通过罪刑法定原则、犯罪的本质特征及安乐死与故意杀人罪的比较等三个方面,对安乐死合法化问题作一初步探讨。     

初探安乐死

现代医学条件下，“安乐死”问题已经越来越引起世人的关注。这一问题众疑云云，因为安乐死的诸环节无不关涉到种种道德问题，而且由于道德问题，在安乐死的立法问题上也疑云重重。     

浅谈安乐死申请人资格与实施程序的立法——台湾地区通过《安宁缓和医疗条例》修正案引发的思考

我国台湾地区《安宁缓和医疗条例》及其修正案中对于申请人资格与实施程序细致而科学的规定,对于我国大陆安乐死立法具有启示与借鉴作用。对此,大陆安乐死立法应包括对末期病患本人及其近亲属作为申请主体的规定,并需以立法形式确定安乐死实施程序、医疗鉴定形式要件、鉴定医师资格及必要人数、鉴定医疗机构、申请安乐死授权形式、申请见证人、实施安乐死方式和标准、医生告知义务、实施医疗机构、实施操作记录、见证人员等。     

安乐死——人类生命权的选择

人类在对待生与死的问题上 ,求生是最本质的。但对于一个濒临死亡求助无望的人而言 ,人类应当尊重他对自己生命权的选择。     

安乐死问题的宪法学线索

安乐死的宪法学思考目的在于提供安乐死的国家立场。从宪法权利的观念看，安乐死的争论主要围绕着生命权的本质展开。生命权的本质是自由权，也就是个人自主安排自己生死的权利，这种权利可以授权医生协助其安乐死。对于非自愿的安乐死患者，可以基于人的尊严的理由对其进行安乐死，因为人的尊严是比生命权更高的价值。但是国家将这种选择交给了患者的家属。     

Body Donation after Medically Assisted Death: An Emerging Consideration for Donor Programs

Around the world, the recent introduction of assisted death laws has meant that undertaking medical assistance in dying (MAID) is now an option for some persons wishing to end their life. Some of these people donate their bodies to medical science, and by doing so have created a new route from which donor programs can now receive bodies. Such donations have also illuminated a myriad of novel ethical questions. This article considers the emotive and controversial topic of MAID in relation to body donation, describing the experiences of McMaster University, Canada, where several MAID body donors have been received by the anatomical donor program. It provides background on the development and implementation of MAID in Canada, and describes the experience of staff and students at McMaster to MAID donations. It also explores the relevance of MAID to body donation programs, and discusses several of the ethical challenges facing body donation programs who may encounter MAID body donors. These include the appropriateness of accepting MAID donors, issues with informed consent, the effect of personal engagement with MAID donors, information sharing around MAID donations, governance issues, and negative historical parallels between MAID and euthanasia. Suggestions on how to manage MAID body donation focus on how issues affecting institutions, faculty, and students may be approached utilizing appropriate transparency and communication, some of which may facilitate student professional development around the topic of MAID. It is also suggested that the development of ethically appropriate guidelines on MAID body donations may positively guide the anatomical community.