辅导员对新建地方本科院校学生考研的引导作用

学生考研比率日益成为评价高校教学质量的重要指标之一。辅导员在新建本科院校学生考研工作中可以充分发挥角色优势,从学生考研意识、学习方法、心理疏导及信息服务等多方面起引导作用。     

对高师开设现代教育技术课程的新思索

针对现代教育技术课程特点及教学中所存在的问题,就如何达到更好的教学效果、如何培养师范专业学生教育技术能力等,探讨了对该课程的改革,即将教学内容划分成模块,不同模块采用不同的教学策略、充分利用专题学习网站开展研究性学习、改革考核方式等。     

关系主义与文学研究

本质主义与反本质主义论争是＂关系主义＂的出场语境。南帆的＂关系主义＂是一种阐释策略,是文学理论应对日益复杂化的中国经验与文化问题的一种论述策略。它不仅仅是一种文学研究的方法论,而且还是一种知识立场,是一种＂广谱的批判＂。阐释者本身也是关系网络之一部分,置身于＂结构＂之中。在文学研究领域,＂关系主义＂迄今还属于一种少数话语,但在其它领域,它并不缺少同道。     

裕固族教育研究的学术精品——评《学校教育·地方知识·现代性:一项家乡人类学研究》

从研究视角的全面性、研究主题的重要性、研究方法的规范性、研究范式的继承性这4个方面评论了《学校教育·地方知识·现代性:一项家乡人类学研究》一书的学术贡献,认为它是裕固族教育研究领域的学术精品,同时在人口较少民族教育研究、教育人类学研究方面也具有重要意义。     

20世纪20-30年代中国留学教育问题的争论

20世纪20年代至30年代,中国教育界有过一场关于留学教育问题的争论。争论由弹劾清华学制对留学美国学生的遴选公平问题引起。争论的焦点是:中国是否应该继续派送留学生及留学教育的国别选择问题。争论的实质是:留学教育是中国教育发展的助力还是阻力?造成留学教育问题的原因是社会的还是个人的?争论目的是:探索中国留学教育的方向与道路。争论的结果是:留学教育的宗旨、方向和政策发生了变化,留学教育因此得以改进。争论提供的历史借鉴是:留学教育与国内教育的关系问题以及留学生归国的教育价值与教育服务问题,这些问题其实也是当代留学教育研究的重大命题,需要我们做出时代的回答。     

20世纪以前的《周礼》学述论

20世纪以前的<周礼>学研究在文字解诂、音义注疏、文献辨伪、有关名物制度的考证及对前人学术成果的总结、整理与评判等方面取得了较为显著的成就,诸多微观研究成果具有较高学术价值.由于理论视野狭窄,研究方法缺乏创新,该阶段的<周礼>学研究也存在一系列突出的问题.关于<周礼>一书的真伪、作者和著作时代等基本问题长期未得到很好的解决,不仅直接影响到相关问题的可信度,同时也使得该书的史料价值未能得到充分的发掘.同时,由于缺乏对该书主体思想等一系列问题作宏观的理论分析,制约着<周礼>学研究向纵深方向发展.     

12种豆科植物次生木质部导管分子比较观察

本文对12种豆科植物次生木质部的导管分子进行了初步比较观察,导管分子之间存在着一定的演化趋势,与花部的演化趋势似乎是相适应的。     

East Asian pop culture and the trajectory of Asian consumption

This article focuses on Chua Beng Huat’s work on the East Asian pop culture that became more prominent in East and Southeast Asia from the 1990s, when the circulation of multilingual and multi-format pop culture started to exceed linguistic, ethnic and national boundaries. It argues that Chua’s work indicates that the pop-cultural production and innovation that support the globalisation and regionalisation processes in East Asia need not be national in origin but can hail from different national origins – and this despite the existing political realities of the region and its history of political fractures. Chua Beng Huat cautions, though, that the national popular can also be marshalled to defeat the border-crossing potential of an inter-Asian pop culture. What is the “Asia” imagined or being represented in such cultural production? Chua’s work is also distinctive in that it deals with the political and economic conditions that underpin mainstream pop consumption as a socio-cultural phenomenon, instead of examining consumption as identity politics. The article concludes by noting the significance that Chua as an institutional builder has played in enabling the study of East Asian pop culture in the region.     

The Itinerary to Explore Headwaters of the New Left’s Cultural Studies

Abstract

The 1980s was a period when the academic current for leisure studies led to the birth of the study of sports history. Japan was not a latecomer in this scholarly stream. More significantly, cultural issues were thought not the part of various phenomena in a society, but the key issues for class integration and class strife. After writing my PhD thesis on Pierce Egan, one of the earliest sport journalists influenced by the idea of early radicals in the nineteenth-century Britain, my attention turned over to the question of why the study of sport history was necessary. There was the academic impact inherited from the New Left’s belief that ‘without understanding the state of people’s culture, class issues are unable to be truly comprehended’. The Initiation of sport journalism had a similar destiny. This consequence appears to be a synchroflash between the early radicals’ concern in popular culture in the nineteenth century and the New Left’s interest in cultural studies in the twentieth century. There was an obvious reason why the radical essayists and contemporary academics had to pay attention to the ‘cultural turn’ with critical thinking in a society.     

Reception of Stuart Hall in the Korean intellectual field

After Stuart Hall’s death in 2014, Korean newspapers ran detailed obituaries praising him as an influential British intellectual figure. The broad media attention appears to be unusual, given that he maintained a relatively unknown presence in the Korean cultural fields compared with other theorists. This work examines how and in which context Hall’s writings have been cited, or not cited, and emphasized in the Korean cultural studies. The incorporation of Hall’s writings into the resources of the academic field entangled him in scholarly rituals of parochial citations and applications, resulting in the fragmentation and de-contextualization of Hall’s overall problem. The selective focus on and occasional absence of certain aspects among his intellectual and political legacies may demonstrate how imported British cultural studies have, or not yet, been indigenized and localized in Korean cultural and political contexts.