协同创新视阈下高职院校科研团队组织模式研究

协同创新是新时期对创新的一种深入解读,高职院校在协同创新体系中具有重要的地位与作用。高职院校科研团队存在发展封闭、管理松散、绩效考核有待提高等问题。协同创新具有的协同性、共享性、高效性、持续性四个特点,可优化现有科研团队的组织模式。面向协同创新的科研团队优化组织模式可分为四类：基于项目的团队模式、基于共同体的团队模式、基于实体的团队模式、基于联盟的团队模式。     

企业绿色产品营销策略研究*--以周黑鸭食品股份有限公司为例

随着人们绿色环保意识的不断提升和绿色农产品消费市场的不断扩大,企业践行绿色营销观念、推进绿色产品营销成为满足顾客需求和应对市场挑战的重要手段。作为一家立足于“绿色、安全、健康”经营理念的农产品深加工企业,周黑鸭食品有限公司在绿色产品营销上有很多举措,同时也面临一些亟待解决的问题。文章以武汉市场500名消费者为调查样本,从绿色产品的认知、意向及行为三个方面进行调查,由此指出：企业应帮助消费者提升绿色消费认知;促进政府加强市场监管企业自身应加快技术研发;从消费者、政府、企业三个层面合力推进企业绿色产品营销创新。     

军事院校“人工智能导论”课程思政教育研究

课程思政教育是军地高校坚持社会主义办学的重要内容,针对“人工智能导论”课程的教学环节,分析了思想政治教育的必要性和研究现状;同时结合军事院校的办学特点,探讨了军事院校思想政治教育的特殊性;设计了符合军校生认知和需求的课程思政教育路径,对培养有灵魂、有本事、有血性、有品德的新一代革命军人具有一定的参考意义。     

思想政治教育理念下“经济学”教学创新模式探索

“经济学”是高校经管类专业的学科基础课,具有知识成体系但内容繁多、概念抽象、学生有畏难情绪等特点。为实现教学目标、保证教学效果,围绕以学生为中心教学理念,在思想政治教育背景下构建了“学习内容成体系、案例互动助吸收、习题配套促巩固、训练方法能自学、关联对比更爱国”教学思路与方法。通过使用线上线下相结合、课程思政入课堂、对知识系统讲解与关联对照、培养学生良好习惯、“角色代入”式案例分析等五个教学手段,帮学生实现了建构主义式学习,增进了学生将理论应用于实际的能力,增强了其爱国情怀。     

研究型大学一流创新团队的形成与发展——以中国科学技术大学量子信息研究团队为例

世界一流大学建设的关键是人才。在创新驱动发展时代,以人才为核心的一流创新团队建设,一定程度上决定着我国在新一轮全球科技竞争中能否赢得主动。中国科学技术大学潘建伟院士领衔的量子信息研究团队敢为人先、开拓进取,经过长期的不懈努力,探索出一条立足中国本土培养世界一流人才的新模式,在量子科技领域实现了从跟跑到领跑的蜕变。总结其成功经验,可归纳为四个方面:注重培育具有世界影响的领军人物;着力构建灵活高效的人才培养与激励机制;科学规划切实可行的阶段科研目标;秉持服务国家、造福人民的使命担当。     

协同创新视角下高职院校图书馆构建社会化信息服务平台的探索与研究

协同创新是高职院校图书馆开展社会化服务的新动力.高职院校图书馆的社会化服务对象主要面向行业产业和地方区域,具有自己独特的优势和特色.高职院校图书馆构建基于协同创新的社会化信息服务平台要实现可持续发展,需要相应的保障机制.     

体育院校实验班英语教学的创新研究

本文在基于对体育院校实验班群体特征以及影响该群体英语水平提高因素分析的基础上,主要从教学理念、教学模式、课程设置与教材选择、教学内容与教学手段、评估体系等五个方面阐述体育院校实验班英语教学的创新。     

项目教学视域下的旅游英语教学创新思考

随着我国国际化水平的深化与国际之间交流频率增加,对于外语的需求越来越大。目前我国旅游英语课程也快速发展起来,我国由于旅游行业的需求和旅游管理专业学生的岗位要求,基础教育导向,对旅游英语课程引入了项目化的教学改革,从而完善了教育思维理念更新、教育方法改进,侧重培养学生灵活的旅游英语学习及应用思考能力,营造趣味性强的旅游英语课堂,创新旅游英语学习方法,更全面地提高我国旅游英语的学习水平。     

Reconciling Political and Economic Goals in the Net Neutrality Debate

The net neutrality debate is one of several sites of struggles to adapt and redefine rights and obligations of stakeholders in the Internet-centric communications system. Its outcomes will shape the future of the Internet and influence the level and distribution of its benefits. We identify key values that drive the net neutrality discussion and examine the governance mechanisms proposed to achieve these objectives. We find that there is no single policy instrument that allows realization of the range of valued political and economic objectives simultaneously. Contrary to some of the claims advanced in the current debate, safeguarding multiple goals requires a combination of instruments that will likely involve government and nongovernment measures. Furthermore, promoting goals such as the freedom of speech, political participation, investment, and innovation calls for complementary policies.     

In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry

Processes of designing for systemic innovation for sustainable development (SD) through the lens of three long-term case studies are reported. All case studies, which originated from the SLIM (Social Learning for the Integrated Management and Sustainable Use of Water at Catchment Scale) Project, funded within the EU Fifth Framework Program (2001–2004), constitute inquiry pathways that are explored using a critical incident approach. The initial starting conditions for each inquiry pathway are compared; significant pathway dependencies are identified which foster the development of social learning processes locally, but constrain their uptake and embedding across the wider system of interest. In the first case study, in England & Wales, promising developments in the application of social learning approaches to river basin planning over an initial 3-year period were subsequently marginalised, only to resurface towards the end of the 10-year period of study. In the second, South African case study, significant spaces for social learning and innovation in integrated water resources management were opened up over a five year period but closed down again, primarily as the result of lack of policy support by national government. The third, Italian, case study was designed to assess options for adapting to climate change by opening up new learning spaces between researchers, stakeholders and policy makers. A case for investing in local level systemic innovation through social-learning praxis design approaches and in learning processes around well contextualised case-studies is supported. However, concomitant investment by policy makers in social learning as an alternative, but complementary, governance mechanism for systemic innovation for SD is needed.