论“以德治校”的伦理意义和践行举措

“以德治校”是江泽民同志“以德治国”理论在学校管理工作中的具体应用 ,是实现学校培养目标的重要手段 ,是社会主义精神文明建设的重要内容 ,是学生健康成长的重要保证。要搞好学校管理 ,领导要以德施政 ,为人典范 ;教师要以德施教 ,为人师表 ;学生要以德治学 ,为人正直 ,全面发展。     

北京农村教师专业发展模式及存在问题的调查

为了全面了解北京市农村地区教师专业发展的现状,在对北京市十个农村地区进行了大样本问卷调查和深入访谈后,经过定量与定性数据分析得出以下结论:北京市农村地区目前主要存在教师个体专业发展模式、大学与中小学合作的教师专业发展模式、中小学校本研修模式、与城区合作的教师专业发展模式等四种教师专业发展模式。北京市农村地区教师专业发展存在的问题有:教师队伍建设困难,教师专业发展缺乏专业引领和工学矛盾突出等。     

高等学校内部分层管理机制研究

针对我国高校现行体制的弊端,降低管理重心,明晰高校内部各管理层次之间的责、权、利关系,是高校内部权力结构调整的重要环节,也是保证高校学术健康发展的一个重要方面。为此,要积极探索构建学校、院（部）、系（所）分层管理机制,适当扩大学院和系（所）的自主权,下放行政权力（包括下放教学权、科研权、人事权、财务权等）,加强基层的自主适应能力,激发基层的发展动力。同时,在实行分层管理的过程中,要注意处理好纵向和横向之间的关系,即处理好学校和学院之间、学院和系之间、行政职能部门和学院之间的关系。     

基于遗传算法的高校试题组卷系统的研究

阐述了高校组卷系统的原理,重点研究了作为系统关键的组卷策略运算过程,提出了一个改进的动态分层遗传算法作为高校组卷系统的组卷策略,最后通过实验检验其性能。     

教师职业生涯发展理论及其启示

论述教师职业发展模型及影响教师职业生涯发展的因素，探讨其对我国教师教育改革的启示。     

Emerging Attributes of Pedagogy and Curriculum for the “New World Order”

This article is a conceptual one designed to start dialogue on educational issues that are unfolding amidst the changes in other sectors of our society such as production, services, and recreation. We first present an overview of the fundamental but profound changes evidenced in our society and then discuss the nature of these changes and their impact on human ability to function effectively within such an environment. In light of the complexities such as uncertainties and dualistic/multiple perspectives and incongruities, we propose that a model for pedagogy and curriculum development should adopt critical thinking as the key attribute—because it has the potential to deliver an education system for the new world order.     

论民国时期“政府主导、服务型”乡村改造模式——以民国江西农村服务为中心

1934年国民党在江西开展了农村服务运动。当时的民国江西农村工作者,从管教养卫四个方面开展农村服务工作,探索出了一套以政府主导、服务农村为特点的传统乡村社会改造模式,力图从多方面推动江西农村社会的现代化。尽管这种模式有其难以解开的死结,但仍是值得今天借鉴的农村改造模式之一。     

The Impact of an SES-Based Model on a College's Undergraduate Admissions Outcomes

In Grutter vs. Bollinger, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the use of race as one factor, among many in admissions decisions is constitutional. It is not known, however, whether future legal opinions will continue to uphold the use of affirmative action policies. Some have argued that class-based preferences can achieve many of the same goals as in affirmative action while being more likely to withstand legal challenges. To date, no empirical studies have been conducted on the potential impact of a class-based admissions policy if implemented at an undergraduate institution. This paper reports on a study at a selective public college and compares a number of outcomes under three admissions models: the original admissions decisions, a purely academic model, and an socio-economic status (SES)-based model. The findings showed that use of the SES-based model would have led to a more academically qualified class than in the original admitted class while maintaining substantially greater student diversity that was found under the academic model. An admissions policy based on preferences for socio-economically disadvantaged applicants appears to hold promise for other colleges and universities with similar institutional and applicant characteristics. The ideas and research design reported in this paper are based on the doctoral dissertation study of the second author, Undergraduate Admissions Models Incorporating Socioeconomic Factors (Johnson, 2000).     

Models and Paradigms in Kuhn and Halloun

In Modeling Theory in Science Education, Halloun (2004) adopts the word ‘paradigm’, but his use of the term is radically different from that of Kuhn. In this paper, I explore some of the differences between Kuhn’s paradigms and Halloun’s paradigms. Where Kuhn’s paradigms are public, community-defining exemplars of practice, Halloun’s paradigms are private, individualized ways of thinking. Where Kuhn writes of the paradigm shift as a revolutionary, vision-altering conversion experience, Halloun writes of a gradual evolution from one way of thinking to another and an easy back-and-forth switch between paradigms. Since Kuhn’s paradigms are self-enclosed and incommensurable, there is no objective standard by which one paradigm can be shown to be superior to the other. But Halloun uses ‘viability’ as a standard for paradigm choice. Underlying all of this is the more basic question of whether the history of science is an appropriate metaphor for student progress in the classroom. I conclude with some brief thoughts on this question.     

汉英句子扩展模式之对比研究及相关汉译英策略

翻译是一个比较差异、解决差异的过程,而句子是交际活动中的基本语言单位。现从句子层面对比分析英汉两种语言不同的句子扩展模式,即汉语的句首开放性与英语的句尾开放性,以及由此导致的不同句式特点,并探讨相关的汉译英策略。