论定罪与量刑的关系模式

定罪与量刑的关系模式是我国量刑程序改革理论上的争点与实践中的难点。探寻一种适合我国国情的定罪与量刑关系模式,对推动我国量刑程序改革的深入进行有着非常重大的意义。对于被告人认罪案件,各界普遍认为应适用相对独立的量刑程序,目前专家学者们的分歧在于对被告人不认罪的案件应适用相对独立的量刑程序还是独立的量刑程序。各地方法院量刑程序改革试点的实践证明,对于被告人不认罪案件的审理,独立的量刑程序更具科学性与合理性。     

当代高校辅导员队伍职业化、专业化探索

辅导员是高校思想政治教育工作者,辅导员队伍建设虽然取得了一定的成绩,但在高校辅导员队伍建设中仍然存在着一些问题。针对这些问题本文着重从：专业化、高学历化、科研工作的开展和网络工作平台等这几个方面剖析了近年来高校辅导员队伍的职业化、专业化变化及发展。     

Recognizing the Outliers: Behaviors and Tendencies of the Profoundly Gifted Learner in Mixed-Ability Classrooms

This article focuses on (a) distinctions between the profoundly gifted individual and others, and (b) a chart describing tendencies and/or behaviors associated with the profoundly gifted student in common, mixed-ability educational settings. The intent is to provide educators, parents, and policymakers with preliminary awareness about the unique behaviors and tendencies of the profoundly gifted learner in heterogeneous educational settings. Learners with measured IQ scores greater than 3 SD units above the mean are a statistical rarity—outliers—in most educational settings. The current inability of most educators to identify and even minimally address needs leaves these students anxious, frustrated, and otherwise unable to reach their intellectual capacity in the majority of school settings across the country. Focused research and careful attention to the nature and needs of these individuals throughout their lives can contribute substantially to our developing understanding.     

行政决策听证的理性论辩特征及程序要求——基于商谈理论的视角

重大行政决策的听证主要包括政策类、规划类和项目类听证。它们的共同特征在于,以理性论辩的方式确认体现公共利益的公共目标,以此限制行政决策权的恣意。在听证程序设计中,需将理性论辩的要求渗透到相应的程序规定中,即,有利于广泛参与的程序准入规定;有利于充分论辩的程序权利规定;有利于认真反思的程序角色规定;有利于结论自治的程序终结规定。     

兴奋剂问题的高学历化倾向初探——基于外显和内隐的态度研究

兴奋剂问题的高学历化倾向日益引起社会对高校竞技运动发展的担忧,而针对高校兴奋剂问题的干预,将其关在规则的牢笼里具有重要的社会价值和现实意义。本研究基于双态度理论模型,采用自我报告和IAT实验深入地分析高校运动员兴奋剂使用的内在驱动机制和容忍度,并提出侧重高校大学生认知和行为层面的干预,强化其规则意识以及降低其对兴奋剂的容忍度是促进高校竞技体育回归本原的重要着力点,进而更好的实现运动员、竞技体育和整个社会的和谐发展。     

从价格听证浅析行政听证制度

行政听证制度一直被视为行政程序法的核心制度,甚至被认为是衡量一国有无行政程序法以及行政程序法发达与否的标志。以行政听证制度中最贴近大众生活的价格听证制度为切入点,分析了当下中国行政听证制度中存在的不足,并提出完善我国行政听证制度的具体措施。     

Separating the research question from the laboratory techniques: Advancing high‐school biology teachers' ability to ask research questions

Inquiry is essentially a process in which research questions are asked and an attempt is made to find the answers. However, the formulation of operational research questions of the sort used in authentic scientific inquiry is not a trivial task. Here, we set out to explore the possible influence of separating the research question from the laboratory techniques used to try and answer this question on teachers' understanding of laboratory techniques and their ability to formulate research questions. We conducted a laboratory course in microbiology in which the laboratory techniques were presented in an explicit and generalized manner, in the context of specific research questions. During the course, teachers' understanding of laboratory techniques improved as reflected in their answers to exercises given throughout. In addition, teachers' ability to ask research questions, analyzed using Dillon's classification of research questions, also improved. When reflecting upon the course, some teachers attributed the change in their ability to ask research questions to their increased knowledge of techniques, whereas others did not. We conclude that to facilitate research‐question‐asking skills among teachers, they should be provided with knowledge of the relevant laboratory techniques in an explicit fashion. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 49: 1296–1320, 2012     

解析新刑事诉讼法视角下的侦查阶段辩护制度

1996年修改的《刑事诉讼法》让律师享有了介入侦查的权利,但没有明确律师的法律地位和身份。此次新刑事诉讼法明确了律师在侦查阶段的身份和地位,增加了辩护人对犯罪嫌疑人诉讼权利保障的规定,健全了侦查阶段法律援助制度,从而完善了律师在侦查阶段的辩护制度。     

REPORTING ON FAIRNESS IN CIVIC LIFE

Drawing on procedural justice research from social psychology, this study explores the role that journalistic practice plays in telling community members about whether local politicians are behaving fairly. Qualitative interviews with 24 community journalists working in cities in Upstate New York are used to answer the following research questions: (1) how does content regarding authority fairness find its way into news stories, and (2) what facets of justice—whether distributive, voice, or relational—do journalists emphasize. The interviewed journalists said that they often used their evaluation of local politicians’ fairness in deciding whether to pursue a story. In doing so, these journalists highlighted questions of whether politicians were listening to community members and the degree to which they appeared to take the best interest of citizens to heart. There was little agreement among journalists about the degree to which citizens could adequately make fairness judgments based on local news coverage, although the television reporters believed that television's visual component provided key information about the fairness of local politicians.     

Attribution‐based strategies for initiating and terminating friendships

Research in attribution theory has almost exclusively focused on the perception process to the neglect of studying how communicators incorporate attribution‐based information in their message behavior. This study derived a typology of attribution‐based strategies from Kelley's attribution cube and Jones' ingratiation tactics to assess respondent strategies for initiating and for terminating same‐sex friendships. Respondents were 191 persons drawn from fifth grade, high school, college, and post‐college groups. Results of the study included: 1) distinctiveness information was disproportionately employed in the strategy repertoires to the neglect of consistency‐based and consensus‐based information; 2) respondents had greater variety in types of strategies for their initiation repertoires as opposed to their termination repertoires; 3) repertoire variety for both initiation and termination increased from childhood through adolescence.