中国新闻媒体宣传报道冬奥会的常见问题及北京2022年冬奥会和冬残奥会宣传报道策略

运用文献研究法和案例分析法梳理和概括了中国新闻媒体在2010年温哥华冬奥会、2014年索契冬奥会、2018年平昌冬奥会宣传报道中的常见问题,并基于此提出北京2022年冬奥会和冬残奥会(以下简称"北京冬奥会")宣传报道策略:1)北京冬奥组委要统筹协调面向新闻媒体记者的服务工作;制定应对突发负面新闻舆情事件的宣传工作预案;讲好中国故事,展现大国形象。2)宣传报道北京冬奥会的记者要掌握一定的冰雪运动技能知识,扎实做好采访前的准备工作,灵活运用采访技巧,全面了解北京冬奥会设置的冰雪运动项目,采写的新闻作品要及时甚至即时发布;电视台记者在现场与新闻直播间连线对话时要增强镜头意识,要善于研究和改进摄录设备。3)北京冬奥会赛事解说员要全面而准确地掌握北京冬奥会赛事的相关信息;要对冬奥会项目比赛规则与裁判常用判罚术语的英文字母代码及其含义了如指掌;解说与评论宜客观与公正;不要使用带有攻击性的词汇和敏感性词汇。4)中国新闻媒体宣传报道北京冬奥会的内容中不宜对比赛结果作经验性判断,要传播人文关怀;中国新闻媒体既要平衡国内运动员和国外运动员的新闻报道量,又要平衡赛场内新闻和赛场外新闻的宣传报道量。     

图书馆哲学探究

从图书馆哲学概念和研究意义出发,利用已有的图书馆哲学研究成果,就“图书馆哲学”这一术语的提法、图书馆哲学与图书馆学理论基础的关系、用哲学的逻辑思维探讨图书馆哲学的必要性、图书馆哲学把教育哲学纳入讨论范围的必要性、图书馆学术研究应不应该以哲学理念作为始点、人文关怀与图书馆哲学的统一性以及图书馆哲学的深入应用与发展——图书馆2．0等几个问题提出了初步的看法,并倡导发扬哲学的批判精神。     

图书馆休闲文化"核"的建设及其人性关怀扩张

论述了图书馆的起源和发展与休闲的同源性,提出了图书馆休闲文化的"核"功能,使人们进一步认识到文化休闲在人们的生活和工作中的重要地位。图书馆的休闲功能是人类文明进步的重要标志,在未来社会中会愈来愈得到发展,它不仅是权益,而且需要"物化",读者应去追求自己的休闲权益,图书馆的管理者和工作人员应转变思想,以人为本,使人真正把图书馆作为学习生活之必须的文化交流舞台。     

图书馆学的科学化与合理性

提出图书馆学的科学化和合理性问题。认为以图书馆这一人文社会现象作为自己研究对象的图书馆学,不可能实现绝对科学化和客观性,图书馆学科学化的实质是图书馆学的合理性,即合规律性与合目的性的统一,构建合理性图书馆学理论必须坚持科学实证与哲学人文建构相结合。     

From Inarticulacy to Care

This article seeks to critically re-open the closed structure of news coverage of ethnic minorities by proposing a dialogical model of representation, which evokes mutual understanding across differences through well-crafted narratives of minority experiences. Informed by Mikhail Bakhtin and Charles Taylor, it explores the notion of “dialogue” within journalistic narratives and delineates two dialogical approaches, namely the evaluative articulation of moral values and the polyphonic incorporation of different voices. The former suggests that journalists should employ nuanced languages to situate ethnic minorities’ aspirations and experiences in a common “horizon of significance”. The latter challenges the hegemonic monologue of an ostensibly objective narration and accentuates the manifold voices from ordinary people, urging the journalists to rethink their positionality as narrators. Two cases are analyzed to reveal how the dialogic representation can be realized in news reporting, calling for a transition from “ethics of inarticulacy” to ethics of care in journalism practices.     

论专业课程教学中的人文教育

目前各高校己在专业课程教学中将人教育摆到了一个相当重要的位置，各高校都明确了化素质教育的定位和内涵，指出了当前专业课程教学中应加强化素质教育工作，以提高全体大学生的化品位，审美情趣，人素养和科学素质。     

The relative safety of paternal,maternal, and traditional foster care placements

When children are placed into foster care the caseworker must give preference to an adult relative, many of whom are grandparents, over an unrelated caregiver. This kinship preference is based in evolutionary biology, which suggests that the imperative to care for a child should be greater for kin versus non-kin. However, not all kin are related to a child in the same way, and level of paternity uncertainty may influence level of care provided. For instance, maternal grandparents can be assured that they share genetic material with their grandchild, while paternal grandparents may not have the same level of certainty. Owing to the possibility of paternity uncertainty, we hypothesize that out-of-home placements with paternal grandparents will be at a greater risk of subsequent investigations than placements with maternal grandparents or with foster parents. We secured data on placements n = 560 of children ages 1.5 to 17 following a maltreatment investigation from a merger of the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being NSCAW II and the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System NCANDS. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression were used to examine the difference in time to the first new investigation by type of out-of-home placement while controlling for covariates. Consistent with our hypothesis, placements with paternal grandparents were at a higher risk of a subsequent investigations than placements with maternal grandparents or non-kin foster parents. Results suggest a need for further considerations of child safety in foster care based on genetic relatedness of caregivers.     

The adoption of children from out-of-home care: The understandings of key decision makers in Victoria,Australia

Adoption is one of a range of options that can provide children in out-of-home care with permanency when they are unable to be reunified with their birth parents. This paper reports on how the adoption of children from out-of-home care is understood by professionals involved in making decisions about the permanent placement of children in out-of-home care in Victoria, Australia, where adoption is rarely used. Data were collected through a single, face-to-face semi-structured interview with 21 professionals; eight child welfare specialists, eight adoption and permanent care specialists and five judicial officers. The adoption of children from out-of-home care was primarily understood as a child-centered practice that can afford children stability and a sense of belonging. Adoption was largely viewed as a voluntary process dependent upon the consent of a child’s birth parents. Adoption and permanent care specialists were the only group to refer to the dispensation of parental consent as a means of obtaining an adoption order. Most decision makers understood that contact between children and their birth parents is possible following adoption, but this was not understood by all judicial officers or all child welfare specialists. Children’s connection to their cultural heritage was viewed as important to the consideration of adoption for children in out-of-home care. This research provides insight into the foundations upon which decision makers may appraise adoption, within a hierarchy of options, as a potential outcome for children in need of permanency.     

In-house consultation to support professionals’ responses to child abuse and neglect: Determinants of professionals’ use and the association with guideline adherence

This study examined the presence and strengths of determinants associated with consultation of an in-house expert on child abuse and neglect (CAN) by preventive child health care professionals who suspect CAN. This study also assessed the relationship between in-house CAN expert consultation and professionals’ performance of six recommended activities described in a national guideline on preventing CAN for preventive child health care professionals. A total of 154 professionals met the study’s inclusion criteria. They filled in a questionnaire that measured in-house consultation practices and twelve determinants associated with the professional, the in-house expert, and the organizational context. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. Almost half of the participants (46.8%) reported to consult the in-house expert in (almost) all of their suspected CAN cases. Professionals who reported better recollection of consulting the in-house expert (i.e. not forgetting to consult the expert) (p = .001), who were more familiar with consultation (p = .002), who had more positive attitudes and beliefs about consultation (p = .011) and who reported being more susceptible to the behavior (p = .001) and expectations/opinions (p = .025) of colleagues regarding in-house expert consultation were more likely to consult the in-house expert. Furthermore, in-house expert consultation was positively associated with two of six key guideline activities: consulting the regional child protection service and monitoring whether support was provided to families. The implications of these results for improving professionals’ responses to CAN are discussed.