The different faces of controlling teaching: implications of a distinction between externally and internally controlling teaching for students’ motivation in physical education

Background: In Self-Determination Theory (SDT), a well-validated macro-theory on human motivation, a distinction is made between internally controlling teaching practices (e.g. guilt-induction and shaming) and externally controlling practices (e.g. threats and punishments, commands). While both practices are said to undermine students’ motivation, they would do so through somewhat differential motivational processes. Unfortunately, the relevance of the conceptual distinction between internally and externally controlling strategies has not been examined systematically. In the context of sport and physical education (PE), most studies on controlling teaching have either measured controlling teaching in an undifferentiated way or have focused on one particular feature of controlling teaching.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide a more fine-grained picture on the differential de-motivational effects of internally and externally controlling teaching strategies in the domain of PE.

Participants: A total of 925 students with an average age of 15.80 years (±1.99) coming out of 92 classes taught by 22 different PE teachers participated in the present study.

Data analysis: Data on perceived controlling teaching style and students’ motivation were analyzed within a multilevel framework from both a variable-centered (regression analyses) and person-centered approach (cluster analyses).

Results: We found evidence for a distinction between perceived internally and externally controlling teaching. Both teaching styles were strongly related to each other (r?=?.54). At the level of zero-order correlations, both internally and externally controlling teaching related negatively to students’ intrinsic motivation and identified regulation and related positively to introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation. However, when both teaching styles were included simultaneously as predictors of motivation in the regression analyses, only internally controlling teaching predicted poor quality and low quantity of motivation. A cluster analysis revealed different profiles of perceived controlling teaching style, with two profiles being characterized by either high or low levels of the two types of controlling teaching and other profiles displaying elevated or reduced levels of one of the types of controlling teaching. This person-centered analysis confirmed that particularly students who perceive their PE teacher as internally controlling are likely to report poor-quality motivation.

Conclusion: Controlling teaching (and internally controlling teaching in particular) is related to maladaptive motivational outcomes. As such, it can be advised to PE-practitioners to refrain from using controlling strategies when teaching students. More research is needed to identify the conditions under which teachers’ behavior is perceived as externally and/or internally controlling.     

对外国经典译著的编辑思考

把高质量的译本奉献给读者,是从事外国经典译著编辑的终极目标。在编辑外国经典译著时一定要忠于原文,与译者交朋友,勤查各类工具书,重视读者意见,注意自身素质的提高,关注各类翻译赛事以发现和培养优秀译者。     

《郑风》之独特风貌及其成因

历来为正统的固守礼教者谓为"淫"的《郑风》实则是先民本然情感无掩饰的流露,在内容的言略意丰与形式的新颖独特上都昭示出独特魅力。《郑风》所展现的独特价值大抵与郑国秉承的传统文化习俗、在春秋初国力强盛之于思想文化之影响及其本身地理交通经济状况有关。     

学风建设深层问题的几点思考

高校学风建设要以学生为中心，一切从学生的根本利益出发，对学生全面负责。通过深化教育教学改革，充分调动学生学习的积极性、主动性、创造性并培养学生优良的道德品质是学风建设的根本目的。     

气骨遒劲——论五代词人孙光宪词的审美风格

孙光宪是五代《花间集》中的一名重要词人。在《花间集》中,孙光宪的风格区别于温、韦,也区别于其他作家,呈现出气骨遒劲的审美风格,主要体现在情感的力度、浑然的结构、精警的语言和阔大的意境等四个方面。孙光宪不仅开创了气骨遒劲的美学风格,而且对南唐词和宋词的发展有很大的影响。孙光宪在唐宋词史上应该占有一席重要之地。     

英文格律诗的翻译

英语格律诗的翻译主要涉及节奏、译文的体裁、风格的继承三大问题。英诗的节奏无法完全翻译 ;译文的体裁应有译者本国诗歌文化的烙印 ,能够丰富译文的底蕴 ,加强读者的文字想象 ;英诗原文的风格包含时代风格、语言风格 ,除此以外还有译者的写作风格 ,三者皆是继承原文风格需考虑的因素     

论"荷花淀派"小说浪漫主义风格的分化

论文通过对“荷花淀派”的孙犁和此流派其他作家的小说作品进行二元对位的分析与比较，从而辨析“荷花淀派”与浪漫主义文学要义的失之交臂。     

试论如何办好社科理论内部期刊

社科理论内部期刊是社科类期刊的一个重要组成部分，办好社科理论内部期刊对于宣传贯彻党的路线方针政策具有重要作用，社科理论内部期刊必须坚持以马列主义、毛泽东思想为指导，同党中央保持一致。同时，社科理论内部期刊还必须有自己的风格，特点。     

《苔丝》两种译本中理解、选词、原文风格的比较

在比较研究《苔丝》的两种译本的基础上,从翻译的理解、选词和原文风格的再现等三个方面,通过具体实例分析了两种译本的各自特点,比较了其中的得与失。     

遥聆八股声如雷——八股文的文化学背景与文体学内涵

近现代反传统语境中,科举制与八股文普遍受到不公正对待.从文化角度看,科举制是社会分工体系和科层结构的产物,其内在生命力至今不绝.作为考试文体,八股文已退出历史舞台,但八股文是先民集体性文、文明、文饰、用八诸观念综合作用下的历史产物,其贵重文明、辨物析理的文化精神值得继承.