回归教学学术：技术时代的教学正义

教学技术经历了从生活的技艺到知识传播的工具再到交换价值凸显的商品的演进历程;教师从思想的探险者演变为知识的阐释者最后沦为教学技术的消费者;教师的文化品性相应地呈现为创造性行动、重复性劳动和冒险性工作三种形态。教师技术化所导致的哲学思维的弱化、伦理意识的浇薄和艺术追求的消失是教师教学学术趋于式微的根源。教师的教学正义意味着教学技术的合法性愈加强大时,教学学术的合理性就更应该得到张扬。     

苏联对新中国体育援助的历史审视

作为首个建立社会主义制度的国家,苏联向社会主义阵营提供了大量的体育援助。新中国在接受苏联的体育援助下,奠定了新体育建设的重要基础,推动了体育事业的发展渐入正轨。运用文献资料法、逻辑分析法和历史研究等方法,以苏联对新中国的体育援助为研究对象。提出其产生的历史背景,阐述其发生的详细过程,审视其带来的历史影响。研究结论:1)苏联对新中国体育援助的动机是出于冷战格局的现实需要;2)新中国接受体育援助的动机是根据自身需要主动提出的;3)"一边倒"外交政策的确立为新中国接受苏联体育援助提供了基础和保障;4)体育援助领域广泛、内容丰富、形式多样;5)体育援助的时间虽然较短,却为新中国体育事业的发展起到了重要的奠基作用,同时也产生了利与弊共存的深远影响。研究价值:旨在追溯历史、产生启发,达除弊兴利、科学发展之效。     

论教练员教育知识管理的建构

摘要：科技知识发展所体现出知识的巨大价值促使关于人才知识素养的培养成为重要研究课题之一。教练员作为专业技能人员,是运动员竞技表现优劣的重要影响因素。教练员的专业素质、道德以及社会素质反映着我国的运动总体水准并影响着运动发展前景。本论文在梳理国内外知识管理研究的基础上,通过文献资料法、专家访谈法和问卷调查法等方法对我国教练员知识管理的现状进行调查,从教练员的素质内容与教育知识、教练员教育知识管理的目标与原则、教练员教育知识管理的模式三个方面对我国国家队教练员教育知识管理进行分析与论述。指出在三目的、三原则（专、享、控）以及三流程的“三--三--三”相统一的建构模型下将教练员的教育知识进行有效化、系统化地分析并组织成一个更具有生命力的知识系统平台,从而促进教练员教育知识的生产与创新的过程。     

高校共青团网络思想引领工作的基本要求及实现路径

社会思想意识的多元多样,信息传播媒介与传播方式的深刻变化,给大学生网络思想政治教育带来了新的挑战. 紧密围绕立德树人根本任务,着重开展马克思主义信仰教育、社会主义核心价值观培育、 中华民族优秀传统文化以及大学精神的传承与弘扬是高校共青团网络思想引领的基本要求;构筑团属网络宣传引导阵地,强化网络宣传引导队伍,优化共青团网络宣传引导活动是加强高校共青团思想引领的基本路径.     

论我国教练员继续教育专业化的实现路径

教练员继续教育专业化就是要以高标准追求高质量,通过高标准的培训达到提高竞技体育教练员综合素质和职业能力的目的.教练员继续教育专业化是竞技体育教练员继续教育的现实抉择;竞技体育教练员职业可持续发展的需要;运动训练科学化的必然要求.重塑专业化的教育理念、构建专业化的继续教育制度、完善专业化的管理机制、完善专业化的继续教育内...     

生成视野中的国外教学设计理论本土化问题研究

国外教学设计理论经过了产生期、形成期、盛行期、革新期等发展阶段,其生成一是依赖于社会需要的促动,二是取决于认识论、学习心理学和教学设计的整合,三是信息技术的革命性影响。国外教学设计理论在本土化过程中存在诸多问题,如基于本土的教学设计创新不足、缺乏心理学等基础学科与信息技术的支撑、教师自身缺乏教学设计观念与能力等。要解决这些问题,必须正确认识与评价国外教学设计思想,促进教学设计的本土创新;构建研究共同体,促进教学设计理论与实践的结合;增强教师的教学设计观念与能力;构建以＂学习者＂为中心的教学设计模式。     

Instructional leadership practices in Singapore

This paper presents a review of the literature on principal instructional leadership in Singapore. The authors investigated the dimensions of instructional leadership in the practices of Singapore principals and highlighted the strategies these leaders adopt to enact their instructional roles. Singapore principals were found to play an active role in defining the school vision and promoting the school climate. However, in the areas of curriculum implementation and classroom instruction, the middle management team in the school played more active roles as compared to principals. Five broad conclusions were discussed to provide perspectives on instructional leadership practices in Singapore. This paper also highlighted limitations on current instructional leadership research in Singapore and pointed to areas of future research.     

平面设计类网络课程的教学交互研究

网络课程教学交互水平的质量决定了网络教学效果。针对目前平面设计类网络课程存在的问题,分析网络教学交互理论,构建基于项目引导的"主导—主体"平面设计类网络课程教学交互模式。在分析学生特点、课程性质及教学目标的基础上,结合媒介从教学内容、教学支持两方面开展教学交互设计,以期为网络课程教学质量提供保障。     

Professional development to support principals' vision of science instruction: Building from their prior experiences to support the science practices

The implementation of science reform must be viewed as a systems-level problem and not just focus on resources for teachers and students. High-capacity instructional leadership is essential for supporting classroom science instruction. Recent reform efforts include a shift from learning about science facts to figuring out scientific phenomena in which students use science practices as they build and apply disciplinary core ideas. We report findings from a research study on professional development (PD) to support instructional leaders' learning about the science practices. After participating in the PD, the instructional leaders' familiarity with and leadership content knowledge of the science practices significantly improved. Initially, principals used their understandings from other disciplines and content neutral visions of classrooms to make sense of science instruction. For example, they initially used their understandings of models and argument from ELA and math to make sense of science classroom instruction. Furthermore, some principals focused on content neutral strategies, like a clear objective. Over the course of the PD workshops, principals took up the language of the science practices in more nuanced and sophisticated ways. Principals' use of the language of the science practices became more frequent and shifted from identifying or defining them to considering quality and implementation in science classrooms. As we design tools to support science, we need to consider instructional leaders as important stakeholders and develop resources to specifically meet their needs. If the science feels too unfamiliar or intimidating, principals may avoid or reframe science reform efforts. Consequently, it is important to leverage instructional leaders' resources from other disciplines and content neutral strategies as bridges for building understanding in science. We argue that the science practices are one potential lever to engage in this work and shift instructional leaders' understandings of science instruction.