大型体育场馆设施赢利模式的探讨——广州天河体育中心案例分析

提高大型体育场馆设施的公共服务效果、经营管理效益,以及从业人员的专业管理水平,是我国“十一五”期间体育事业发展的一项重要工作。广州天河体育中心作为全国范围内经营效益较好的大型体育场馆设施之一,其成功的经营管理经验值得总结与推广。本研究以广州天河体育中心作为案例研究客体,通过访谈法、文献研究法、数据统计等方法,对其收支情况、主要产品服务、经营手段等内容进行研究,以期揭示构建大型体育场馆设施赢利模式的主要方法与手段。     

'I Hate You. Please Help Me': A Case Study From A Classic Boxall Nurture Group

This article is a case study of a five year old boy, Peter, and his entry and development within a classic Boxall Nurture Group. The author explores nurture groups in general as well as describing Peter's assessment, his challenging behaviour, the support he received and the final outcomes of the work.     

After assessment: application of the results of an acquisitions teams survey

This paper will briefly discuss the team structure at the Pennsylvania State University Libraries, and the reasoning behind a recently completed teams assessment survey. It is extremely important to act on information gathered from surveys, and not just file it away. The focus of the paper, therefore, will be on the process we developed to implement and act upon the results of the assessment survey. The work with the University’s Human Resources Development Center to develop a tool to guide the staff through the process will be examined and discussed at length.     

试论奥运会等大型体育赛事中的公共关系问题

我国正在积极筹办2008年的奥运会，这是向世人展示我国改革开放成果的最佳途径之一。成功举办2008年的奥运会，将对进一步提升我国在国际上的地位具有十分重要的意义。本文从公共关系的研究入手，探讨举办奥运会等大型体育赛事问题。     

运用多元决策数学模型评价体育实验教学质量的研究

立足于体育实验教学实际，通过查阅文献资料、专家咨询调查等方法，并借鉴已有的教学评价经验，运用模糊数学原理和统计学理论，构建出体育实验教学质量评价指标体系和方法体系。它对于加强实验教学管理，促进实验教学质量的提高具有重要的实际意义。     

高校思想道德修养课量化考核研究

高等学校开设的思相道德修养课，是对大学生进行思想道德教育的主渠道，然而，现行的教学模式存在很多弊端，不仅施教过程中严重脱离实际，耐用考核也缺乏科学性，不能考出受教育的真实水平，改革现行的教学模式，势在必。而改革现行的考核办法，实施量化考核则是关键环节。     

城镇居民全民健身状况综合评价方法研究

根据城镇居民开展全民健身运动的实际情况，论述了综合评价的方法和原则，建立了评价指标体系的逻辑关系图，提出了采用数学方法来探讨评价事物的整体情况。结论阐述了该评价方法的不同用途及使用过程中的注意事项。     

Accommodations for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing in Large-Scale, Standardized Assessments: Surveying the Landscape and Charting a New Direction

Students who are deaf or hard of hearing (SDHH) often use test accommodations when they participate in large-scale, standardized assessments. The purpose of this article is to present findings from the Third Annual Survey of Assessment and Accommodations for Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. The "big five" accommodations were reported by at least two-thirds of the 389 participants: extended time, small group/individual administration, test directions interpreted, test items read aloud, and test items interpreted. In a regression analysis, language used in instruction showed the most significant effects on accommodations use. The article considers these findings in light of a more proactive role for the National Survey in providing evidence for the effectiveness of accommodations with SDHH.     

Can a Teacher‐Led State Assessment System Work?

Recent implementation of Nebraska's Standards-based Teacher-led Assessment and Reporting System (STARS) introduced a unique opportunity to examine the benefits and drawbacks of a teacher-led state assessment system. STARS is unique among state assessment systems in that statewide tests are replaced by locally developed assessments designed by teachers. Benefits of this system are found to be greater teacher use of results for instructional planning, greater diagnostic utility of the assessments, and gains in assessment literacy. Disadvantages include the time-consuming and stressful nature of creating localized assessments. Compatibility of STARS with the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act are discussed.