建设高校图书馆成为地方文物文献的收藏博览中心

作为历史研究中不可或缺的环节，地方现代史的收集、整理和馆藏应提到较高的重视程度；高校图书馆，特别是中小城市的高校图书馆，长期以来只是学校的图书信息中心，而在校园文化建设中没有起到应有的作用。本文提出将地方高校图书馆建成当地文物文献的收藏和博览中心，既服务于地方的文化建设，又塑造高校的人文精神，形成具有地方特色的高校文化。     

基于网页摘要分析的元搜索引擎研究*

针对目前搜索引擎返回结果的海量性，构建一个元搜索引擎，旨在高效利用多个成员搜索引擎返回的结果。介绍元搜索引擎的基本架构及当前结果融合的主要方法，应用统计学方法研究网页标题、网页摘要与网页文本之间的相关性关系，从而确定相关度权值进行结果相关性判断。实验证明，元搜索引擎搜索结果的平均准确率比各个成员引擎的搜索结果平均准确率都有较大提高。     

跨库检索策略研究

本文在研究跨库检索系统的基础上，根据跨库检索系统特点提出制定跨库检索策略的方法。     

垂直搜索引擎发展概述

本文分析了垂直搜索引擎的产生，与水平搜索引擎的区别所在，数据来源，盈利模式以及发展方向。     

社会智力资源对图书馆地方文献工作的影响

文章阐述了智力资源在地方文献工作中的作用；提出了社会资源的管理策略。     

地方高校图书馆特色馆藏建设思考

地方新建本科院校图书馆怎样配合学校教改，建立本馆特色馆藏谈论不多见。文章针对这个问题从三个方面作了深入的调查研究和分析。     

与时俱进做好地方文献的征集工作

介绍了广东地方文献征集工作的一些实际做法，针对在征集过程中遇到的实际困难提出了采取的措施。     

口述历史在地方文献工作中的意义及实践

文章首先简要介绍现代口述历史的含义及其发展历程，阐述了口述历史对于地方文献工作的意义，并结合自己的工作实践探索开展口述历史工作的方法和需要注意的问题。     

Anonymous personalization in collaborative web search

We present an innovative approach to Web search, called collaborative search, that seeks to cope with the type of vague queries that are commonplace in Web search. We do this by leveraging the search behaviour of previous searchers to personalize future result-lists according to the implied preferences of a community of like-minded individuals. This technique is implemented in the I-SPY meta-search engine and we present the results of a live-user trial which indicates that I-SPY can offer improved search performance when compared to a benchmark search engine, across a variety of performance metrics. In addition, I-SPY achieves its level of personalization while preserving the anonymity of individual users, and we argue that this offers unique privacy benefits compared to alternative approaches to personalization.     

Quality and relevance of domain-specific search: A case study in mental health

When searching for health information, results quality can be judged against available scientific evidence: Do search engines return advice consistent with evidence based medicine? We compared the performance of domain-specific health and depression search engines against a general-purpose engine (Google) on both relevance of results and quality of advice. Over 101 queries, to which the term ‘depression’ was added if not already present, Google returned more relevant results than those of the domain-specific engines. However, over the 50 treatment-related queries, Google returned 70 pages recommending for or against a well studied treatment, of which 19 strongly disagreed with the scientific evidence. A domain-specific index of 4 sites selected by domain experts was only wrong in 5 of 50 recommendations. Analysis suggests a tension between relevance and quality. Indexing more pages can give a greater number of relevant results, but selective inclusion can give better quality.