首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   512篇
  免费   11篇
  国内免费   8篇
教育   390篇
科学研究   81篇
各国文化   2篇
体育   29篇
综合类   12篇
信息传播   17篇
  2023年   6篇
  2022年   2篇
  2021年   12篇
  2020年   15篇
  2019年   22篇
  2018年   12篇
  2017年   13篇
  2016年   20篇
  2015年   17篇
  2014年   17篇
  2013年   73篇
  2012年   21篇
  2011年   31篇
  2010年   20篇
  2009年   31篇
  2008年   36篇
  2007年   31篇
  2006年   27篇
  2005年   25篇
  2004年   13篇
  2003年   17篇
  2002年   10篇
  2001年   13篇
  2000年   11篇
  1999年   5篇
  1998年   6篇
  1997年   7篇
  1996年   8篇
  1995年   1篇
  1994年   1篇
  1993年   3篇
  1992年   1篇
  1991年   1篇
  1990年   1篇
  1989年   1篇
  1979年   1篇
排序方式: 共有531条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
531.
This paper discusses a three-level model that synthesizes and unifies existing learning theories to model the roles of artificial intelligence (AI) in promoting learning processes. The model, drawn from developmental psychology, computational biology, instructional design, cognitive science, complexity and sociocultural theory, includes a causal learning mechanism that explains how learning occurs and works across micro, meso and macro levels. The model also explains how information gained through learning is aggregated, or brought together, as well as dissipated, or released and used within and across the levels. Fourteen roles for AI in education are proposed, aligned with the model's features: four roles at the individual or micro level, four roles at the meso level of teams and knowledge communities and six roles at the macro level of cultural historical activity. Implications for research and practice, evaluation criteria and a discussion of limitations are included. Armed with the proposed model, AI developers can focus their work with learning designers, researchers and practitioners to leverage the proposed roles to improve individual learning, team performance and building knowledge communities.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic
  • Numerous learning theories exist with significant cross-over of concepts, duplication and redundancy in terms and structure that offer partial explanations of learning.
  • Frameworks concerning learning have been offered from several disciplines such as psychology, biology and computer science but have rarely been integrated or unified.
  • Rethinking learning theory for the age of artificial intelligence (AI) is needed to incorporate computational resources and capabilities into both theory and educational practices.
What this paper adds
  • A three-level theory (ie, micro, meso and macro) of learning that synthesizes and unifies existing theories is proposed to enhance computational modelling and further develop the roles of AI in education.
  • A causal model of learning is defined, drawing from developmental psychology, computational biology, instructional design, cognitive science and sociocultural theory, which explains how learning occurs and works across the levels.
  • The model explains how information gained through learning is aggregated, or brought together, as well as dissipated, or released and used within and across the levels.
  • Fourteen roles for AI in education are aligned with the model's features: four roles at the individual or micro level, four roles at the meso level of teams and knowledge communities and six roles at the macro level of cultural historical activity.
Implications for practice and policy
  • Researchers may benefit from referring to the new theory to situate their work as part of a larger context of the evolution and complexity of individual and organizational learning and learning systems.
  • Mechanisms newly discovered and explained by future researchers may be better understood as contributions to a common framework unifying the scientific understanding of learning theory.
  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号