高职英语对话教学几种要领

针对高职英语知识输入依然重于应用能力培养的教学现状,根据教育部关于高职高专英语教学的基本要求,通过课堂观察、观摩教学及访谈,提出了高职英语对话教学可操作的五个实施要领,激发学生习得语言的积极性,增进师生、生生之间的对话,活跃英语课堂教学。     

Using methodological triangulation to examine the effectiveness of a mentoring program for online instructors

In this quasi-experimental mixed methods study, we examined the effectiveness of a faculty-to-faculty mentoring program to increase student success rates in online courses at an American university. Over one semester, 24 faculty mentees worked with 6 faculty mentors on improving course organization and implementing student engagement techniques. Using methodological triangulation, we found positive results for two of our effectiveness measures (i.e., mentor and mentee feedback and mentors’ ratings of mentees’ courses). However, in terms of our third measure (i.e., student learning data), although institutional data showed that there was a 4.1% aggregate increase in online student success after the intervention, the intervention group made no significantly greater gains than two control groups. Our findings highlight some benefits and shortcomings of these types of university initiatives and also emphasize the importance of using triangulation to integrate participant feedback with formal measures of student success.     

“五计学”的方法融合探究——对我国图书情报学方法体系创新的影响

[目的/意义]了解"五计学"当前研究方法特点及其融合发展状况,建立"五计学"研究方法体系,为我国图书情报学研究方法和体系创新提供借鉴意义。[方法/过程]以图书情报学期刊所载计量学科论文为例,采用内容分析法,人工检索其2010—2019年的"五计学"相关论文,进行统计分析和社会网络分析,建立"五计学"研究方法体系。[结果/结论]近10年来"五计学"研究方法的特征是定量分析;"五计学"研究方法呈现"数据收集—数据处理—数据分析"的融合状态。进一步提出"五计学"研究方法体系可以分为一般理论分析方法、文献计量学方法、统计分析方法、计算机技术分析方法、数学模型方法、社会网络分析方法和其他研究方法,并针对图书情报学研究方法提出建议。     

印尼与中国民间故事比较研究

印尼和中国的民间故事具有"大同小异"的特征,大同首先体现在两国民间故事具有若干相同的母题类型:即惩恶扬善的英雄传奇、劝谕训诫的动物叙事、忠贞不渝的爱情传奇、备受尊崇的民间信仰、发人深省的伦理悲剧;其次体现在它们在艺术手法上的不谋而合之处:即寓泛神话色彩的故事于自然的表现手法、拟人色彩的动物视点、寓情于理的世态展现。两国民间故事既有整体层面"大同",亦有局部层面的"小异",即在诸母题范畴的内部细节和艺术手法的具体运用等方面,呈现出差异化的面貌。     

“三自主”选课与高校体育课程改革的实践研究

建立学生选课制是适应高校体育课程新一轮课改需要的举措。通过实践发现,新兴体育项目、趣味性娱乐性强的项目受到学生青睐;男女生选课具有明显的倾向性;一些传统的竞技体育项目受到冷落。“三自主”选课满足了学生个性发展需要,提高了学习的主动性和积极性;选课制为不同系别、不同专业、不同性别的学生加强交流、相互学习创造了条件;选课制促进了教师专业发展并提出了进一步改革学生选课制的建议     

同情地理解、抽象地继承与综合地创新--略论20世纪护守中华传统人文的方法论智慧

中华传统人文在20世纪经历了异常坎坷的命运,但富有历史责任感的思想家也在中西古今之争的语境中培塑了护守中华传统人文的方法论智慧.首先,同情地理解风雨飘摇中的中华传统人文,决定了“友“(同情性)是我们护守中华传统人文的情感基点;其次,抽象地继承中华传统人文的合理内核,决定了“取“(选择性)是我们护守中华传统人文的理智途径;最后,综合地创新既与传统一脉相承、又与现代密不可分的中华民族文化,决定了“得“(主题性)是我们护守中华传统人文的意志目标.20世纪护守中华传统人文的方法论智慧,在新的世纪中有着至关重要的理论价值和现实意义.     

Making Explicit the Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Discourses – Revisiting a Newly Developed Methodological Framework

Sfard and Kieran [Kieran, C., Educational Studies in Mathematics 46, 2001, 187–228; Sfard, A., Educational Studies in Mathematics 46, 2001, 13–57; Sfard, A. and Kieran, C., Mind, Culture, and Activity 8, 2001, 42–76] have developed a methodological framework, which aims at characterizing the students’ mathematical discourses while they are working in groups. In this study, I focus on an important aspect of this methodological framework, namely the interactive flowcharts. The aim of this study is to suggest two complementary analyses for the construction of the interactive flowcharts: an additional analysis by means of the analytical construct of contextualization as well as an analysis of types of mathematical discourses. Based on data from a study of how four groups of Swedish engineering students collaboratively construct concept maps in linear algebra. I show that the two complementary analyses make the construction of the interactive flowcharts more coherent and transparent, and hence, more reliable. Furthermore, the two complementary analyses dramatically changed the picture as to whether the studied discourses were to be seen as mathematically productive or not. In the end of the article, I discuss the possibilities of performing the suggested additional analyses within the original methodological framework.     

Complicating methodological transparency

A historical indicator of the quality, validity, and rigor of qualitative research has been the documentation and disclosure of the behind-the-scenes work of the researcher. In this paper, we use what we call methodological data as a tool to complicate the possibility and desirability of such transparency. Specifically, we draw on our disparate attempts to address calls for transparency about methodological processes in our respective dissertation studies in order to examine how novice researchers can explore transparency as a situated, ongoing, and philosophically informed series of decisions about how, when, and if to be transparent about our work. This work contributes to conversations about how qualitative researchers in education can understand, discuss, and teach qualitative inquiry while continuing to push the boundaries of the field.     

纪念曹雪芹逝世240周年

重新校订出一部更好的《红楼梦》版本，是对曹雪芹的最好的纪念。这个版本要能最为接近曹雪芹原真笔，传达出原重在传神写意的中华化和艺的民族个性特色。