试论社区矫正的本土化

社区矫正制度代表着罪犯处遇的未来方向,已被世界各国广泛使用。其理论根基源于刑法谦抑性思想、行刑社会化理念。就我国现状而言,我国社会理念载体、法律载体和物质载体为社区矫正的本土化提供了现实可能。建议通过完善社区刑罚的刑事立法,整合现有基层司法资源,完善矫正机构职能分工,来完善社区矫正制度,保障和促进社区矫正在我国的发展。     

2005年中国教学论研究:反思、对话与回归

2005年,中国教学论研究的主题可以概括为:在反思和对话中回归自身传统。教学论研究者们在理论与实践的矛盾与整合中提出和探讨了一些具有生长点意义的问题,对多元背景下教学论的发展历程进行了梳理。对一些似是而非的理论问题进行了澄清,并提出在新形势下教学论的发展趋向。     

浅议形象教学法在普通话语音教学中的运用

从理论讲解和实践指导角度，对形象教学法在主持专业普通话语音教学中的运用进行分析和论述。     

建构主义视角下翻译理论的建构和教学改革

建构主义的思想来源于认知加工学说,它认为学习是一个主动的过程。在这一理论的指导下我们的教学不能再把知识作为预先决定了的东西强压给学生,学生对知识的接收,只能由他自己来建构完成。这样培养出来的人才才更具有创造性精神,更能适应时代的发展。我们有必要打破原有的教学模式,发挥学生的主观能动性,让他们逐渐变为学习的主体。     

音乐教育新教学方式探讨

为了提高学生对音乐学习的积极性和主动性、提高课堂教学效果,探讨了新的教学方式,分析了它的特点,举例说明了它的运用。     

巴赫金对话理论的修辞学研究

巴赫金(M.M.Bakhtin)学术思想的核心和精髓是对话理论,其主旨在于强调一种积极的、崇尚个性、注重平等参与的人文精神,对话思想贯穿于他的语言学和符号学思想。虽然巴赫金不是修辞学家,但他有关修辞学的陈述都倡导将修辞学解释为对话,从而确认了话语的各种形式。巴赫金的对话概念极大地发展和丰富了修辞学传统,由此而形成的对话修辞学将巴赫金作品中和现代文化理论中所形成的新的概念应用于修辞学传统,给传统修辞学注入了新的活力。巴赫金的对话修辞学是一种检测我们与他人的观点以及检测我们自身的手段,尤其是对我们个体的和文化的差异的一种检测。从修辞学的视角来探讨巴赫金的对话理论,有助于对其理论能进一步加以审视和理解。     

We make the road by walking together: New teachers and the collaborative and context-specific appropriation of shared social justice-oriented practices and concepts

This study examined the work of a collaborative group of six new United States-based social studies teachers from the same social justice-oriented teacher education program (SJOTEP). Shared practices and concepts introduced previously in the SJOTEP were developed and appropriated to their classrooms and schools in consideration of the local context, through the collaborative problem-solving process of the group. It is argued that SJOTEPs and TEPs committed to issues of diversity, democracy, inclusion, and/or equity should be collaboration-based, teach a coherent and consistent social justice-focused curriculum, and provide post-graduation collaborative support and research it.     

The 'new' politics of education in Britain's changing times

The British Labour Party has continued to make progress on education, following two broad policy paths and adopting a pragmatic approach that does not attempt to force these to cross or converge. One path is that of the quasi market inherited from the previous Conservative administration; the other is characterised as 'intervention' to support those for whom the market remains almost entirely irrelevant. Some observers regard this dual approach as 'opportunism' and Labour's education policy as a 'betrayal' of principle, by which is meant the principle of 'equal opportunity'. Of course, that principle provides equal opportunity to fail as much as to succeed. Rather than leaving education to the market, Labour has focused on the needs of those most likely to be failed by the principle of 'equal' opportunity in a quasi market.     

Cloning the Blairs: New Labour's programme for the re-socialization of working-class parents

In his speech to the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) in July 1999, the UK Secretary of State for Education, David Blunkett, set out New Labour's vision for a system of education in which there is ‘excellence for the many not just the few’. He outlined what is essentially a bi-focal strategy for achieving this vision. The first focus is on the education system itself, the structures and practices that New Labour believes need to be in place if schools and services are going to meet the needs of all children and not just a privileged minority. The second focus is on the need to promote ‘a culture of achievement’, as, according to Blunkett, the vision ‘depends on changing attitudes as well as the system itself’. This paper focuses on this second strategy, more specifically the government's attempts to change the attitudes of parents. It is argued that this strategy aims to eradicate class differences by reconstructing and transforming working-class parents into middle-class ones, that it represents possibly the most important and far-reaching aspect of New Labour's policy agenda, and that it has not so far received the attention it deserves. The paper is in two parts. The first part sets out what is involved in New Labour's programme of re-socialization and explores the mechanisms by which New Labour is attempting to universalize the values, attitudes and behaviour of a certain fraction of middle-class parents. The second part develops a critique of this programme.