一流智库战略研究成果的质量管理机制

国际一流智库影响力的取得有很多决定因素,但关键是其战略研究与政策咨询报告的高质量,而高质量又取决于其研究成果的高标准与质量管理机制。文章通过对一些国际一流智库高质量研究标准或指南、研究成果的严格独立同行评审的质量管理机制和流程的梳理,总结了研究成果质量管理机制的有益经验和启示。文章指出,我国新型智库建设中,尚未将高质量分析与研究的质量管理机制作为智库建设的重要环节来抓,既缺乏研究成果的相关高质量管理理念,也缺乏管理的制度规范,更缺乏质量管理控制的严格流程。为此,文章提出了我国新型智库建设的高质量分析与研究标准及质量管理机制建议。     

Researching up and across in physical education and sport pedagogy: methodological lessons learned from an intergenerational narrative inquiry

Of issue in this paper are the ways in which different forms of narrative may be of value in undertaking research in potentially thorny situations. The project that inspired this paper saw 30 Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy (PESP) Early Career Academics (ECAs) from more than 20 universities across Australasia, North America and Europe, provide narrative accounts of their ongoing academic experiences. From these stories, three letters seeking advice and guidance from leaders in the field were constructed. Following further feedback from the ECAs, the 3 letters were sent to 11 professors in the PESP field with a request to respond, also in letter form. The composite letters and the professorial responses were then the subject of a symposium at an international PESP conference. While the larger project engages with questions of being and becoming an academic in the neoliberal university, this paper is primarily concerned with methodological issues, including our steps and missteps with narrative, inquiry and the field. More specifically, the focus is on narrative as both the method and phenomena of study. As such, we consider issues associated with using dialogue as data, the provocation of participants, as well as both the presentation and representation of data and the relative power of the participants. In doing so, we critically engage with issues of anonymity (or lack thereof), the practice of ‘researching up’ and finally reach the conclusion that the careful approach to data generation, treatment and presentation necessitated by this project, should be a more regular feature of all qualitative inquiry.     

The impact of peer achievement and peer heterogeneity on own achievement growth: Evidence from school transitions

This paper estimates ability peer effects on achievement growth in reading and math. It exploits variation in peer characteristics generated at the transition from primary to secondary school in a sample of Berlin fifth-graders. As will be discussed in detail, this variation is exogenous in large parts. Results are similar for both achievement measures: pupils benefit from abler peers, but high-achievers do so to a smaller extent. The variance in peer skills has no impact on achievement growth – the corresponding estimates are negative, but insignificant.     

《Tsinghua Science and Technology》网上国际审稿

总结近2年网上国际审稿的情况,分析网上国际审稿的优势和不足.网上国际审稿速度快、质量好,但审回率偏低.在开展网上国际审稿时,应准备好稿件、审稿单和有关信件,还需及时催审和回复审稿专家的信件,尽可能加强与审稿专家的联系.     

FTP服务器在稿件传输中的应用

介绍动态域名FTP服务器在期刊稿件送审中的应用,主要包括大容量稿件送审和审稿专家自主择稿进行审阅的实现方法.     

Partnership Programs in U.S. Schools: Their Development and Relationship to Family Involvement Outcomes

This study examined data from over 300 U.S. schools on their efforts to develop high quality programs of school, family, and community partnerships. Analyses show that elementary schools, schools with greater support from parents, teachers, and the community; and schools that evaluated progress reported higher quality partnership programs over time. Higher quality programs were associated with wider implementation of parent-child interactive homework, higher levels of parent volunteering, and more parents on school decision-making committees. Results identify factors that could help schools develop quality partnership programs and suggest that these programs translate into higher levels of family involvement in students’ learning.     

基于特征数据的开放式同行评议关键因素的实证分析

【目的】对影响开放式同行评议实践的相关因素进行实证研究,发掘开放式同行评议的关键影响因素。【方法】以Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)中开放式同行评议期刊为研究对象,通过网络爬取相关数据。采用变量分类赋值的方式,对影响开放式同行评议的相关定性因素进行量化分析。采用多重对应分析图展示开放式同行评议相关影响因素及其不同类别的内在关联;采用最优尺度回归模型揭示相关影响因素对开放评议类型的影响程度。【结果】开放评议类型与评议专家身份的公开类别具有极密切的关联,评议专家身份对开放评议类型有显著正向影响,且重要性程度值非常高。【结论】评议专家身份是否公开成为开放式同行评议实践模式的关键影响因素,透明性同行评议是当前开放评议行之有效的实践模式。     

Activating the curriculum: a socio-ecological action research frame for health and physical education

The health and physical education (HPE) profession needs to find alternatives to its individualistic and performative focus if it is to remain relevant and meaningful for all learners. This paper presents a way of framing HPE that helps to shift the focus from the individual as autonomous decision-maker, and goes beyond sport and fitness testing as the main contexts for learning. To do this we present the socio-ecological action research (SEAR) frame for unit development that was co-created and enacted over a six-month period involving dialogue between teachers, students, parents, researchers and community. This paper presents findings from semi-structured interviews, student artefacts and field notes collected as one component of a broader three-phase study which spanned three years. The data describe how generalist primary teachers (n=4) from a small Victorian community and their students (aged 8–10 years) tackled a unit of work that positioned centrally the everyday physical experiences of active school travel (AST). Teachers supported students in exploring barriers to their AST, and developing strategies that would counteract some of the negative perceptions that had limited their AST in the past. The findings suggest that the unit of work evolved from an exploration of AST into a much broader exploration of the whole community. This paper does not provide evidence for an alternative way to view HPE, rather it represents an embryonic exploration of how a SEAR frame might support teachers in applying inquiry-based pedagogies that extend beyond the individual as autonomous decision-maker, and promote opportunities for exploration and understanding of environmental, social and personal factors that influence our health and everyday physically active lives. Despite students being positioned as central actors within the SEAR frame, obtaining genuine student voice throughout the process proved challenging.     

《心理学报》开放性同行评审方式探索及初步成效

【目的】 为我国科技期刊进行开放性同行评审提供借鉴和思路。 【方法】 介绍了《心理学报》在开放性同行评审方式上的探索,《心理学报》采用了“开放性同行评审”的一种变式——公开审稿意见。 【结果】 经过充分讨论权衡试用“开放性同行评审”方式的利弊后,《心理学报》最终决定采用“公开审稿意见”这种“开放性同行评审”的变式。 【结论】 除不能达到“缩短发表周期”的目标外,公开审稿意见的方式可以实现“开放性同行评审”的大部分初衷。     

认知视角的科学基金项目专家评议意见分析——基于ER规则的研究

科学基金专家评议意见的可解释性会影响项目资助合理性以及项目申请者对评议意见的理解。项目评议时,专家先根据评议要点对项目的科学意义和应用前景等属性进行评价,得出综合意见;科学基金再合成多位专家意见,得出项目评议结论。在此过程中,专家属性意见与综合意见的一致性和专家间的非共识意见是影响专家意见可解释性的主要问题。上述问题可从认知视角分析其影响因素,并利用ER规则量化影响因素、合成专家意见。通过分析量化可界定专家属性意见的一致性权重关系,判断意见是否一致;而专家间的非共识意见也可因此分为"因属性评价意见不同、权重不同或专家意见不一致造成的非共识";最后依据科学基金专家评议的真实信息验证了方法的适用性。