我国体育专业研究生学位论文20年来的演进

对我国1981～2002年间2162篇体育专业研究生学位论文进行分析，研究体育专业研究生研究课题与方法的变化。体育专业研究生学位论文的选题仍以应用研究为主流，基础研究与开发研究逐渐受到重视：研究方法由实验性与量化为主流的实证主义研究传统转向诠释性与质化的建构主义研究。     

体育研究生培养模式的改革

分析了体育研究生的培养方向，体育研究生应具备的素质，体育研究生培养模式目前面临的挟战，以及在培养过程中易出现的问题。在此基础上，提出了体育研究生培养模式的改革方案。     

医学论文讨论部分的诠释

在医学文献讨论部分的编辑加工中，要特别注意讨论的逻辑性。从诠释学的角度看，讨论中常出现的一些逻辑学问题可归纳为过度诠释，不足诠释，无关或多余诠释，错误诠释等。     

体育科技论文摘要英译的研究

通过研究英、美、加等国英语体育科技期刊论文摘要，总结出其在语言运用方面具有包含大量体育科技词语，较多采用被动语态、复杂长句、非限动主词及程式化表达方式等特点；进而提出我国体育科技期刊论文摘要英译时应遵循客观性原则、规范性原则及美学原则，以使译文更符合体育科技英语的表达习惯及方式，从而达到准确传达原文信息的目的，并且举例进行了分析。     

对体育教育训练学硕士研究生现状的人文思考

摘要：体育是教育的下位概念，体育教育训练学是体育学的下位概念。随着硕士研究生的不断扩招，体育教育训练学硕士研究生的培养会暴露出一些实质性的问题，体育教育训练学硕士点作为培养高层次研究型，运用型的体育教育训练学研究型人才资源库，为了更好地完备将人力资源转化为人力资本。站在人文的角度去理解，领悟培养过程中所暴露出来的一些实质性的问题。就体育教育训练学硕士研究生生源、培养目标、硕士学位论文、工具性学科学习，学生就业压力，学术腐败等六个方面对其现状作出人文思考，最后作出对策性举措。     

What disengages doctoral students in the biological and environmental sciences from their doctoral studies?

This study explored the causes of student disengagement from their doctoral studies in the biological and environmental sciences. The data came from interviews of 40 doctoral students (male?=?15, female?=?25) and underwent qualitative analysis for content. Our results showed that doctoral studies provide multiple contexts for disengagement, such as the scholarly community and supervision, while doctoral students’ sense of distress, cynicism and inefficacy emerged as central components of disengagement. The study identified isolation, indifference, and lack of support and constructive feedback as sources of cynicism, while distress and inefficacy were more often related to failure or lack of progress in research. Our findings indicate that the source of disengagement can vary not only between individuals, but also between the academic activities at hand. Thus, while promoting an engaging doctoral experience, awareness of what typically triggers disengagement in the doctoral journey is vital.     

Evaluating standards-based assessment rubrics in a postgraduate public health subject

Standards-based assessment rubrics are recognised as an important tool for ensuring clear criteria in higher education. Most of the available evidence on rubrics comes from studies with face-to-face undergraduate students. Our study evaluated the introduction of rubrics into a postgraduate subject that included both online and face-to-face students. We conducted formative evaluation with former students to develop the rubrics, as well as surveying current students for process and impact evaluation, supplemented with a focus group. Process results showed that the rubrics were used widely and were generally considered to be of at least some use. Clarity of the rubrics was the main issue affecting perceived usefulness, particularly for the assessment tasks that had undergone comparatively less formative evaluation. Impact evaluation showed mixed results, with students that reported always using rubrics having higher marks on average compared to students who did not always use the rubrics. However, an expected improvement in marks across the whole student cohort compared to previous years did not eventuate, although this could be explained by a number of factors independent of the rubrics. Our results provide some evidence for the use of rubrics in postgraduate and online settings but highlight the need for rigorous formative evaluation.     

学位论文数据库CDDBFT和CDMD的描述元数据比较

《中国学位论文全文数据库》（简称CDDBFT）和《中国优秀博硕士学位论文全文数据库》（简称CDMD）是目前国内比较大型的商业性中文学位论文全文数据库。本文对这两个数据库的描述元数据进行了比较、分析，并建议在学位论文数据库建设中，推广使用《我国数字图书馆标准规范建设：学位论文描述元数据规范）。     

我国台湾省数字化学位论文资源及其特点

本文综述了我国台湾省数字化学位论文资源建设的历史和现状,并从用户角度讨论其建设和服务的若干特点。