试论胡锦涛对社会公平正义的价值定位

胡锦涛从社会公平正义与社会主义制度、中国特色社会主义建设、中国共产党的性质宗旨、中国共产党人的奋斗目标以及社会主义和谐社会的关系出发,充分肯定了社会公平正义的价值,突出强调了社会公平正义的重要性。     

完善高校ERP综合实验教学的思考

ERP实验课是一门实训课程,与传统的教学模式相比,该课程强调的是对学生综合业务技能的培养。目前,国内不少院校建设了ERP实验中心,并开设了ERP实验课程,但教学效果并不是很好。为此,必须加强实验教学环节,加大师资投入,为学生争取更多的锻炼机会,打破传统开课顺序,注重培养学生的专业综合素质,只有这样,才能让学生真正学习到ERP的精髓,真正领悟到ERP对企业的意义。     

教育券：承德地区解决义务教育资源配置公平问题的对策研究

我国的教育资源配置问题是长期积累起来的。教育公平是最大的公平,而义务教育是其根本。推进城乡义务教育均衡已成为当务之急。教育券主张凭券自由择校,可以在以学生选择为本的基础上使我国的城乡义务教育失衡状况有一定改观。     

动产抵押登记制度研究

通过对我国动产登记制度的分析,指出了我国动产登记制度在登记效力、登记机关、登记程序以及登记责任的不足之处,提出了关于如何完善我国动产登记制度的一些思考和建议,希望能为动产登记制度的健全提供一些理论上的分析和指引.     

新刑诉法证据制度有关问题研究

2012年3月14日,第十一届全国人民代表大会第五次会议通过了《关于修改〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的决定》(以下简称"新刑诉法"),这是自1996年修改刑事诉讼法以来,第二次对刑事诉讼法进行如此大规模的修改。此次《刑事诉讼法》的修改内容涉及大量有关证据制度的条文,特别对非法证据排除和不得强迫自证其罪予以明确规定。现围绕修正案主要集中讨论证据制度方面的问题,在肯定其保障人权和完善法治方面的重大进步的基础上,认真分析可能存在的一些不足并探讨和寻求完善的方法和途径。第一部分介绍不强迫自证其罪原则,论述其进步性及局限性;第二部分论述非法证据排除规则,尤其是围绕其与两个证据规定之间的关系论述非法证据概念的内涵与外延、非法证据的证明标准,排除合理怀疑与结论唯一两种理论的对比以及非法证据在量刑程序中是否具有证据能力的问题;第三部分论述我国证人出庭问题的法理基础、证人出庭难的问题与危害,提出相应对策。     

促进创业的老年收入保障制度研究——基于底线公平视角

创业对中国经济增长、技术创新和就业发挥着重要的作用。但是目前中国的收入保障制度导致创业者税费负担重、地区间创业者竞争不公平、保险转移成本高和创业失败生活没保障等严重制约了城乡居民创业的积极性。针对现有制度局限,建议基于底线公平原则,构建一个由政府公共财政支付起“兜底”作用的、以最低养老金标准为上限、以城乡居民最低生活保障标准为下限、呈带状区间的经济收入保障防线,保障所有老年人基本生活的全民基础性养老保障方案。解决创业者的后顾之忧并减轻创业者的缴费负担从而促进创业。     

Diversity of provision in higher education

The prevention and resolution of student complaints are critical factors in maintaining and improving the student experience. Rob Behrens looks at the wider context, drawing on lessons from beyond higher education, to examine the opportunities and possible pitfalls.     

Students' perceptions of fairness in peer assessment: evidence from a problem-based learning course

This paper describes the experience of peer assessment in a problem-based learning course in a Portuguese university, and presents the results of a survey of 120 students who attended the course over seven semesters. Cluster analysis revealed that students group into two distinct clusters with significantly different experiences of peer assessment. Although the larger cluster (70%) expressed a positive experience, the other group perceived peer assessment results and final marks to be unfair, and reported incidents of friendship-marking and conflict arising from peer assessment. Results show that perceptions of fairness (both regarding peer assessment and final marks) are very much associated with those problems. We reflect on these findings to explore implications for practice as well as future research.     

The quest for fairness in language testing

The search for fairness in language testing is distinct from other areas of educational measurement as the object of measurement, that is, language, is part of the identity of the test takers. So, a host of issues enter the scene when one starts to reflect on how to assess people's language abilities. As the quest for fairness in language testing is still in its infancy, even the need for such a research has been controversial, with some (e.g., Davies, 2010) arguing that such research is entirely in vain. This paper will provide an overview of some of the issues involved. Special attention will be given to critical language testing (CLT) as it has had a large impact on language testing research. It will be argued that although CLT has been very effective in revealing the ideological and value implications of the constructs of focus in language testing, extremism in this direction is not justified.     

实体辩护与程序辩护比较研究

本文将研究范围锁定在刑事辩护理论范畴,运用辩证分析法,从理论和制度两个层面,并通过对美国刑事判例“辛普森”案的具体分析,比较实体辩护和程序辩护的异同,以求对两者的内涵和外延形成较为准确的界定。在此基础上．探讨中国程序辩护的未来发展。