“实境耦合”人才培养模式成效研究——以青岛职业技术学院软件与服务外包学院为例

"实境耦合"人才培养模式是学院在创建国家示范性高等职业院校艰难探索实践中确立的。在此模式下,软件与服务外包学院运用"实境耦合"人才培养模式理论指导其改革实践,从课程设置到训教方法改革等与企业紧密耦合,把学生放在真实的职业环境中,校企合作共同完成了对学生知识、技能、态度的培养,取得了一定成效。     

基于NSSE-China的地方院校学生学习性投入调查研究——以咸阳师范学院为例

以教育增值为评价理念,采用NSSE-China为调查工具,通过对在校生学习性投入的调查,分析教育教学的现状及存在的问题,并提出高等教育改革的对策与建议。     

略论订单式人才培养——以苏宁电器股份有限公司为例

订单式人才培养模式是企业发展的迫切需求,也是学校明确办学定位,解决学生就业的需要,是企业、学校及学生多方共赢的选择。本文以广州工程技术职业学院与苏宁电器股份有限公司订单武人才培养为例,阐述了订单式人才培养实践中,以能力为本位基于工作过程课程体系设计,以学生为学习主体,打破学科知识体系,重新按照工作过程安排知识点,在教学中体现职业性、实践性学习情境设计的方法。订单式人才培养模式不仅解决学生就业和生存问题,同时平衡好学生长远发展问题,唤醒学生的力量,培养他们自我学习的主动性,抽象的归纳力和理解力,帮助学生从容面对未来不可预知的环境。     

企业技术人员与学校教师“一对一”教学组合模式探索与实践

学校通过不同途径从企业聘请技术人员作为兼职教师,建立企业技术人员与学校教师"一对一"教学组合共同指导学生进行"五段式"岗位实习。结对教师互签协议,同时进行交流,共同制定岗位工作计划及授课计划。通过评选等方式进行激励。如开展"最佳组合""成长之星""支援之星"的评选活动,并挂学院网页;用文件的形式明确企业与学校教师的待遇和权利。校内教师协助企业教师按教学计划完成各类教学资料的收集与整理上报工作,校内教师根据教学安排每月不定期到企业实践,不断完善教学方案,改进教学方法,积极开发校本教材,提高技能型人才培养质量。     

从认知语言学的角度理解文化语义

界定词语的文化语义,并从认知语言学角度阐述中英文化语义存在着非对应性,它随着人类社会文化的变迁而相互渗透,因此英语学习者在学习英语语言的同时应该注重文化知识的积累。     

构建“终身教育体系”——高等学校发展继续教育方向初探

分析高校继续教育的发展现状以及构建终身教育体系给继续教育发展带来的历史机遇,提出了高等学校发展继续教育的几点新主张,即改革与提升现有的办学形式,构建终身教育网络、搭建终身教育"立交桥",并介绍推行学分银行在实现终身教育过程中的重要作用及其基本体系。     

词汇学习观念与策略之调查比较研究

通过对非英语专业一年级学生的词汇学习观念与策略进行问卷调查并运用SPSS13.0独立样本T检验对调查结果进行高分组与低分组、文科生与理科生、女生与男生差异比较,了解不同群体学生词汇学习观念与策略的使用情况。调查结果显示:所有学生在观念上都赞成词汇应该在用中学,但在实际学习中还普遍运用重复策略。高分组、文科生和女生群体比低分组、理科生和男生群体更主动学习词汇,但还不能有效使用其他元认知策略。高分组、文科生和女生群体比低分组、理科生和男生群体使用更多的词汇学习策略。     

Undergraduate Medical Students' Usage and Perceptions of Anatomical Case-Based Learning: Comparison of Facilitated Small Group Discussions and eLearning Resources

While case-based discussions can empower students to apply knowledge to contextual clinical situations, scheduling these activities is a challenge in crowded curricula. Case-based eLearning activities, derived from existing cases discussed within anatomy small group tutorials, were created incorporating principles such as interactivity, reinforcement, and feedback. Over half of the students accessed one or more of these online cases, with 18% accessing all eight online cases provided. Access increased as the semester progressed, particularly just before summative examinations, implying students used these primarily as revision aides. Students rated both formats highly, but favored the online format with regard to enjoyment (P = 0.048), learning (P = 0.101), and feedback (P = 0.086). However, more students discussed these cases in small group tutorials within the anatomy dissecting room than completed them online (122 vs. 67) and themes emerging from free text comments included a desire to have more time dedicated to these cases during small group tutorials, and an appreciation for the opportunity for discussion with staff and learning through doing. Additionally, native English speakers rated the anatomy room discussions significantly higher in all aspects than non-native English speakers, suggesting that non-native speakers may be hesitant or reluctant to fully participate in front of peers. While online case-based learning activities are a useful adjunct to anatomy teaching, particularly for revision, assumptions that “digital natives” have an innate preference for digital resources require critical evaluation, as students still place a high value on opportunities for discussion with staff during their studies.     

Development and Implementation of the Inaugural Anatomy Education Research Institute (AERI 2017)

Education research is increasingly being recognized as a legitimate route for faculty development in universities. However, many anatomy faculty lack the appropriate training and access to experienced mentors who can help them develop their own education research projects. Inspired by the American Physiological Society’s Institute for Teaching and Learning, the coauthors proposed and developed the inaugural Anatomy Education Research Institute (AERI 2017). Funded by an American Association of Anatomists Innovations grant, the five-day institute was held in Bloomington, Indiana in July 2017. The coauthors spent two years preparing the conference schedule, inviting speakers who could discuss education research topics and mentor applicants, reviewing applications, developing assessment instruments for the institute, and hosting the institute. A total of 62 registered participants (applicants and invited speakers) attended AERI 2017. Through a series of presentations and workshops, participants were introduced to many aspects of education research and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, including developing rigorous education research questions, determining appropriate methods to assess these questions, and searching the education research literature. Each day also included regular time devoted to work on their own education research project with help from more experienced mentors. Throughout the conference, participants were encouraged to post information on Twitter, using the hashtag #AERI2017. Participants had strong positive impressions of the conference and strongly requested future AERI conferences be held. Follow-up analyses will assess the institute in alignment with Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation Model, though preliminary evaluation indicates AERI 2017 met the original aims of the proposal.