从思维方式看中西翻译理论传统的差异

从思维方式的角度对中西翻译理论进行比较，可以看出中西思维方式在悟性和理性、形象和抽象，历史和超前方面存在的差异，这种差异影响和制约着中西翻译理论传统在研究方法上概括笼统与条分缕析、语言表述上含蓄与明了、论证形式上应用型与理论型、微观与宏观以及学科形态上保守单一和开放多元的差别。中西翻译理论之间客观存在的差异可以从中西哲学和社会文化思想的差异上得到解释。     

关于社会主义荣辱观的文化思考

从文化的视角来解读荣辱观不仅有利于践行，而且能够从思想传统和现代精神的层面来加深认识，使全社会更加自觉地理解和弘扬。“八荣八耻”提出的文化意义，就是用正确的、积极向上的荣辱观去引导人、培养人，去规范人的行为。社会主义荣辱观是传统精神的凝练，是新时期道德规范的提升与创新。社会上存在荣辱观颠倒现象其文化原因是中国传统文化中的缺失、“文化大革命”反文化的危害和多元文化撞击的负面影响。在全社会形成正确的荣辱观，要构建社会主义核心价值观，要发挥政府的主导作用和示范作用，要加强纪律、法律的保证作用。     

论庄子思想的不同层次及其作用

庄子的思想是由不同的层次构成的，而这些不同的层次在其体系中具有不同的意义和作用。庄子的整个论述大体上可以划分为三个层次：日常思维、相对性和道。日常思维是最终要消解的对象，相对性是消解僵化的日常思维的工具，而道的作用则在于从终极的意义上消解日常思维和相对性。论者往往只看到了其中的某个层次，因而冠以“相对主义”或“绝对主义”，这就把复杂的思想现象简单化了。因此，理清不同层次的意义及其作用，对于理解庄子的整个思想是有帮助的。     

张三丰道家美学思想的三重特性

元明时期的张三丰,对后世道家美学产生过相当的影响,很值得深入研究。他在实践上师承前贤,深化了内功,理论上以道为主,三教合一,形成了卓然高标、隐逸度世、修身养性的道家美学思想。     

孟子与荀子教育思想之比较

孟子与荀子在教育思想的理论基础、教育与环境对人的影响、教育的目的和任务、教学论等几个方面均有异同,分析其异同,可以从中发现先秦时期儒家教育思想的嬗变轨迹。     

Effects of embedding a problem-posing-based learning guiding strategy into interactive e-books on students’ learning performance and higher order thinking tendency

Owing to the popularity of tablet computers and smart phones, e-books have become an important medium for both formal and informal learning. However, conventional e-books are mainly designed to provide information in the form of multimedia, implying that students spend most of their time memorizing and comprehending what they read from e-books, while seldom engaging in higher order thinking. In this study, a problem-posing framework is proposed for developing an interactive e-book for guiding students to observe and pose questions. An experiment on an elementary school natural science course was conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The participants were 46 fourth-grade students. From the experimental results, it was found that the problem-posing-guiding interactive e-book can significantly improve the students’ learning achievements, critical thinking tendency, and deep motive. It was also found that the proposed approach did not increase the students’ cognitive load owing to the provision of proper supports during the problem-posing process, which has generally been identified as a challenging task.     

Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio‐scientific issue and personal epistemology

This study investigated their views concerning evidence and expert opinion of 10th‐grade students, accessed by an open‐ended questionnaire in the context of a socio‐scientific issue: the cause of flood disasters, and personal epistemology identified by the Learning Environment Preference Questionnaire (LEP). Students' responses to the open‐ended questions showed that when thinking about the flood issue, most students rely heavily on direct and numerical data to draw their conclusions, while experts represented a source of conclusive information. The LEP scores indicated that, in terms of epistemological development, students were mostly at the stage of the ‘multiplicists’ in Perry's model. The statistical analysis suggested that view towards evidence and expert were associated with personal epistemology.     

思路为要——高等职业教育改革与发展刍议之二

高职教育教学改革的思路包括专业建设、专业教学改革和课程教学改革的思路。明确专业建设的思路要求合理设置专业,准确定位专业,科学规划专业。明确专业教学改革的思路要求转变教育观念,培育教学改革主体,依据社会需求设计人才知识、能力与素质结构并构建相应的教学体系,以产学研结合的多种形式构建人才培养模式。明确课程教学改革的思路要求根据专业培养目标确定课程教学目标,进而确定课程考核的内容与形式,进而确定课程教学的内容与形式。     

犹太教纯洁化观念下的“共同体想象”再分析

犹太教基于"纯洁化"的生活形式的追求而指向的"共同体想象"就其本质而言具有世界性意义,这一点使其在后现代视野中具有了与基督教"上帝观"(后现代条件下)之内涵达成沟通的可能,即通过二者之间的"对话"具有达成关于未来生活设想的"共同意见"的可能性,而这可以为后现代社会下的人类整体未来走向提供有益的思想借鉴。     

Weighing up the Influence of Context on Judgements of Mathematical Literacy

Mathematical literacy, viewed as a set of ideas involving applications of mathematics to real-world contexts, has recently featured in curricular discussions about the aims for mathematics education. This article explores the effect that differences in the way that a mathematical task is contextualised can have on students’ mathematical arguments and, therefore, on their perceived levels of mathematical literacy. Seventy-two students’ responses to three similar measurement tasks are described according to Kaiser and Willander’s levels of mathematical literacy. The arguments used for assigning each level of mathematical literacy are then investigated for the presence of specific macro- and micro-linguistic features. The context of the task affects what students perceive to be most relevant approaches to use, which are reflected in the arguments they give; this, in turn, affects external judgements of their level of mathematical literacy.