大学生党员“五位一体”培养教育机制的探索与实践--以L大学旅游学院为例

当前大学生党员培养教育碎片化与高校学生志愿服务的形式化现象日渐凸显。为破解这一困境,通过梳理L大学旅游学院大学生党员“五位一体”培养教育的实践探索,分析高校学生党员培养与志愿服务有效结合的可行性、实效性,进而提出相关完善建议,助推高校实践育人常态化。     

研究性学习课程的特点与价值定位

研究性学习课程作为一种全新的学习方式和课程范式，无论是在理念层面还是在实践层面都有着独特的意义，它与学科课程和活动课程既有联系，又有区别，并在此基础上建立起了全新的师生关系。     

试述我国研究型大学与高层次来华留学生培养

本文从研究型大学的特质出发,结合我国研究型大学的实际做法和经验,较全面地论述了研究型大学与培养高层次来华留学生的关系,及研究型大学对培养高层次来华留学生的作用,并就如何发挥研究型大学的优势培养高层次来华留学生创新人才做了阐述。     

中关大学生生活方式教育比较

生活方式教育作为道德教育的一项重要内容，是新时期社会对高等教育人才培养提出的一项新要求。不同国家的生活方式教育既有共同性，又有一定的独特性。文章运用辩证思维方法，对不同社会、文化背景下的中国和美国大学生生活方式教育的基本内容、教育途径和方法进行了比较研究，旨在为中国大学生生活方式教育提供有益的参考和借鉴。     

美国研究生贷款政策及其风险探析

美国已建立起较为完善的研究生贷款体系,贷款已成为研究生最主要资助方式之一。研究生贷款具有资助对象范围广、资助额度高、资助重点向女性和少数民族弱势群体倾斜、资助力度与学科专业相适应等特点。研究生贷款政策面临的主要风险包括研究生债务负担剧增,学习方式和学位完成率受到影响以及还款拖欠率上升等。美国的经验表明,制定专门的贷款政策、合理运用贷款工具以及完善贷款回收保障措施有助于这一政策的良性发展。     

人文精神指导下的学生工作创新——博雅教育与高校学生工作理念初探

博雅教育是21世纪倡导的一种教育理念。博雅教育培育全面发展的人才,人文精神是其核心要素。大学是培养人才的摇篮,应紧跟时代步伐,不断更新教育思想,为国家的发展做出贡献。作为大学教育新生力量的辅导员们,首先要领会博雅教育所要求的人文精神,将其融入到平时的工作中,从点滴入手,于细微处44新,把服务学生作为工作宗旨,从实际出发,紧密结合我校“建设省内一流综合性大学”的目标,创造性的开展高校学生工作。     

扶贫顶岗实习支教的经济学思考

文章从经济学角度探索扶贫项岗实习支教,主要从马克思的劳动价值论、劳动需求论和劳动供给论,凯恩斯的社会愿意用于消费的量和社会愿意用于新投资的量及供需平衡的经济学分析等视角来阐述实习支教在经济学方面的应用,从而让扶贫顶岗实习支教工作有了经济学角度的理论解释,进而让扶贫顶岗实习支教工作受到更多人的支持与关注,让师范类院校在实践教学中所应用的手段与当前社会基础教育的关系更加紧密。     

新媒体影响下高职院校学生意识形态与思政教育策略研究

近年来,随着科学技术的迅速发展,新媒体得以开发和研究。目前,我国高职院校在学生意识形态教育和思政教育上仍旧存在一些问题,需要采取有效的解决措施,否则就会影响高职院校的稳定发展以及学生综合能力的提高。     

Safe spaces? A social-ecological perspective on student perceptions of safety in the environment of the school canteen

ABSTRACT

Background Research suggests that negative peer interactions that compromise student safety and wellbeing often occur in spaces at school that are not easily visible, not adequately monitored, overcrowded and/or relatively unstructured. In a large online survey conducted in Swedish schools by the anti-bullying organisation, Friends, a small proportion of students indicated that they felt unsafe in the school canteen and responded to a question about why they felt unsafe there. As the canteen is often reported to be a space where negative peer interactions, such as harassment, bullying and other forms of school violence, occur, but little is known about why negative peer interactions occur there, we were particularly interested in exploring why some students perceived their school canteen to be an unsafe space.

Purpose Taking a social-ecological perspective, our aim was to investigate why students reported feeling unsafe in the environment of the school canteen.

Method In order to investigate this question, we analysed 1,547 responses from students in Swedish schools in grades 3–6 (ages 9–12). The responses were from the anti-bullying organisation Friends’ online questionnaires from 2011 to 2016. In the responses, students who indicated that they felt unsafe in the school canteen explained why they felt this way. Data were analysed qualitatively, using a six-step thematic approach.

Findings The analysis identified four key themes: Space constraints, Time restrictions, The risk of social blunders and The negative actions of others. We discuss the findings in terms of the macrosystem, exosystem, mesosystem and microsystem.

Conclusions In matters of student safety and wellbeing, we argue that it is not only important to consider the social context, but also how that context is interconnected with environmental and structural elements.     

Coteaching in early childhood clinical field experiences: a cross-case study of learning affordances

ABSTRACT

Coteaching, a model for learning to teach, places teacher candidates alongside clinical educators in classrooms. Learning occurs through shared practice and on-going explication of thinking and reflection. This cross-case study of six dyads from an undergraduate early childhood inclusive preservice education program examines ways that coteaching afforded opportunities for developing collaborative and adaptive expertise. It was found that opportunities for learning these skills were afforded through coteaching student teaching experiences, although in different ways, and that limited affordances outnumbered strong learning opportunities. Implications for further development of the early childhood coteaching teacher education model, and for professional development, are discussed.