建构主义学习理论与课堂讨论

在中高级汉语教学中，由于一般还是沿袭初级阶段的教学方法，致使中高级阶段的教学任务很难切实完成。本从中高级汉语综合课的课堂讨论入手，尝试用建构主义教学模式来组织课堂讨论，以期改进中高级阶段的汉语教学方法。     

‘You shouldn’t be making people feel bad about having sex’: exploring young adults’ perceptions of a sex-positive sexual health text message intervention

Young adults are disproportionately affected by negative sexual health outcomes, such as sexually transmitted infections. One strategy for reducing such negative outcomes involves the use of comprehensive sexual health education. As comprehensive sexual health education programmes are adopted, there is a need to evaluate the messaging approaches that might best connect with young people. Sex-positive approaches, which describe sex as a healthy practice and personal choice, are becoming popular, but whether this strategy works has not been tested from a message design perspective. This study examines the reactions of young adults to sex-positive or sex-negative messages, framed as a gain or loss, designed for a text message-based intervention. Participants quantitatively evaluated 24 messages on their mobile phones. Gain frames were preferred over loss frames, and sex-positive messages were rated as more believable and persuasive. An interaction between the two concepts was also found. Results highlight how sex-positive messages that focus on the benefits of certain behaviours tend to resonate better with young adults. Implications for health educators and practitioners are discussed.     

陈寅恪论(中)

通过对陈寅恪学术贡献与学术观点的评估、对陈寅恪人特征与化取向的剖析、对陈寅恪研究中几个问题的讨论、对全面评价陈寅恪的若干思考，可得出结论，陈寅恪存在理智与情感的尖锐矛盾，理智上能清醒地看到中国旧化必然歇绝的历史命运，情感上却无法摆脱对此化的深深眷恋。不仅陈寅恪的《诗集》，而且陈寅恪的全部作，都是对这一化的余音不绝的挽歌。陈寅恪的思想基础不是人本主义，而是民族主义、国家主义，他所追求和维护的不是“天下万世的真理”，而是囿于一时间(前现代)、一地域(封建中国)的终将归于不可救疗之局的纲常名教。陈寅恪不是一个真正的自由主义，而是一个坚定的保守主义。     

群论在无机化学中的应用实例

群论在化学中的应用是建立在对称性基础之上的 .分子的全部对称操作的集合完全符合数学群的定义 .运用群论的基本理论和方法来描述分子的对称性 ,却可以简便地处理分子结构的许多问题 ,因而群论成为研究化学的一种有力工具     

小良水土流失中气候水文因素影响的灰色分析

小良地区过去是一个典型的水土流失区，现在已基本上得到了有效的治理，为了使小良能保持可持续发展，我们必须要认真研究导致水土流失的主要因素——气候水文因素，避免历史的悲剧重演。在简要分析水土流失的成因及地形地势、岩土性质、森林植被等因素对水土流失的影响的基础上，进一步运用灰色理论对气候水文这个主要因素对水土流失的影响进行了相关度的分析，突出气候水文因素对水土流失影响的重要地位。     

图式在第二语言习得中的作用

近年来，围绕图式论而开展的一系列外语教学研究，获得一些有意义的发现，拓宽了外语教学研究的领域，加深了人们对外语教学的认识。本旨在利用语言的共同性和差异性运用图式理论去探讨第二语言习得机制，指出图式对第二语言习得的重要作用及成年人学习外语的必由之路。     

论彼得·德鲁克的管理沟通理论与高校师生关系的调谐

师生关系是高校人际关系的最重要的关系之一。近年来,高校师生关系紧张的典型案件越来越多,学生对师生关系的满意度也不高。引入彼得.德鲁克的管理沟通理论,从教育社会学和组织行为学的角度分析师生关系"失谐"之因,并从拓展师生沟通的三度空间(频度、广度和深度)、"弯下腰"倾听学生心声、强化师生共同体观念和修炼"罗丹式"的眼睛等四个方面对教师提出建议以作为调谐师生关系之用。     

武术理论的辩证思维论析

运用马克思主义的科学原理,探讨武术理论中的辩证思维,揭示其特有的基本规律,证明武术理论的思维方式已步入较高级的发展阶段,具有不客忽视的先进性。     

竞技体育发展方式基本理论问题探析

摘要：转变发展方式是我国“十二五”期间体育事业发展的主线,对竞技体育发展方式基本理论问题的研究至关重要。为深化对于竞技体育发展方式转变的理论认识,运用文献资料法,在认识竞技体育发展方式概念、分类和评价的基础上,提出了竞技体育发展方式转变的目标、要求和支撑条件。研究认为：1）竞技体育发展方式转变的目标为集约、均衡、和谐、常规化的发展等。2）要求为科学认识转向、转幅、转速问题,合理处理旧发展方式与新发展方式的关系,正确处理转变的短期效应与长期效应的关系。3）竞技体育发展方式转变的支撑条件为人才资源、科技和管理创新、变革的共识性认识等。为竞技体育发展方式的转变研究提供学理上的支撑。     

A first introduction to archival science

This first introduction, written for educational purposes, is meant to be a concise basic text in which the core concepts of archival science are coherently defined and explained, in a non-polemical way and departing from a de-institutionalised point of view. It is not intended to support or reject any single theory, but to provide an overview. It should be read as a synthesis of a variety of shared ideas and views, not as a manifesto of a new approach to archival science. If there is anything new to it, it might be located in the coherent and integrated presentation. In this primer of archival science annotation has been avoided. The first of several versions of this First Introduction was written in August 1995. It was meant to meet the need of the Netherlands Archiefschool for a basic text on archival science which could support its different programs for archival education and training. After ample discussion with the archival science teachers of the Archiefschool, it was introduced in the 1995/1996 courses. From then on, it has been used in almost all courses and classes on archival science on the undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate levels and in several training and retraining programs of the Archiefschool. The design of the first version has been maintained in all subsequent versions, including this last one. Still, the text has frequently been adapted as a result of discussions with students and colleagues, in and outside the school. This first English version can almost be deemed as a collective product. Of the numerous colleagues who were engaged in this discussion and contributed to the text, special mention has to be made of Peter Horsman, Hans Scheurkogel, Hans Hofman, Eric Ketelaar, Herman Coppens and Kent Hayworth, who commented the English version. For the final text and all imperfections that may still cling to it I am, of course, responsible. An earlier version in Dutch has been published as: Theo thomassen, “Een korte introductie in de archivistiek”, in: P.J. Horsman, F.C.J. Ketelaar en T.H.P.M. Thomassen (red.),Naar een nieuw paradigma in de archivistiek ('s-Gravenhage, 1999), pp. 11–20.