浅谈如何维护农民工的合法权益

农民工是中国现代化过程中的一群特殊群体,同时也是社会生产力和经济高速发展随之带来劳动力大量需求的必然产物。农民工的权益是否有保障,是否能够保护好农民工的合法权益,事关提高党的执政能力和人民的切身利益。维护好农民工的合法权益,对创建和谐社会具有十分深远的历史和现实意义,对城市的经济社会发展影响巨大。试从农民工权益的现状、农民工权益受损的原因、维护农民工权益的对策等方面进行论述,对农民工权益给予更有效的支持与保护。     

对高空抛掷物致人损害的思考

近年来,高空抛掷物致人损害已经成为一个日益严重的社会问题。《侵权责任法》中第87条针对高空抛掷物致人损害的侵权责任做出了明确规定。但是,此规定是否合理、是否符合法理引发了法学界激烈的讨论。针对高空抛掷物致人损害是否符合民事责任构成要件要求进行分析后发现：高空抛掷物致人损害并不满足违法行为、因果关系和过错这三项构成要件要求,不属于侵权责任。     

纯粹经济损失案件中的考量因素

纯粹经济损失通常被认为是一种除对人身和财产的有形损害而造成的损失以外的其他经济上损失。该种损失能否在侵权法上获得救济涉及到多种政策因素。因此对于该种损失赔偿责任的判断应采用一种多因素考量方法。     

人权与民主关系研究

人权与民主关系密切,二者在内容上有相同之处,民主政体有利于人权保护,但二者是两个轨迹不同的运动。认为人权的实现必须以民主制度为支撑,人权运动有可能陷入如建立民主政体一样复杂的境地。无论何种社会制度,保护人权是无条件的。对于民主程度不高或非民主的政体,人权保护与民主制度可以相对分离。     

Ali–Frazier 1: Black Gladiators,White Promoters,and the Economics of Big-Time Boxing

Abstract

The March 1971 heavyweight championship bout between undefeated black boxers Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier elicited numerous responses. Ali, because of his brash persona, refusal to be drafted into the Vietnam War, and outspoken criticisms of white racism, had become a potent symbol of 1960s rebellion and Black Power. Frazier, by claiming the heavyweight championship while Ali was banished, cozying up to white politicians, and refusing to criticize the US government, made himself a worthy foil for Ali’s politics. But as the rhetoric surrounding the fight intensified, regarding black masculinity, patriotism, and community pride, one key aspect of the fight opened up debates in a surprising realm: the economics of black athletes and the possibilities and limitations of black capitalism. In an era when black capitalist programmes emerged nationwide, and when African-American athletes took on more vocal roles as community activists, the battles over the bout’s financial promotion became intense. While the boxers took home an unprecedented $2.5 million each for their participation, total revenues reached nearly $30 million. Discussions of the fight’s payout shed light on a wide range of economic issues facing the black community, and some of the unresolved issues in the quest for civil rights.     

权利法哲学视野中的体育腐败及其治理原则

摘要：针对体育腐败现象,主要通过文献资料法,从权利法哲学视角对体育腐败的定义、本质及其治理原则进行法理解读,目的在于揭示体育领域腐败的深层机理并得出治理之策。体育腐败是发生在体育领域之内的腐败,是享有体育公共权力的主体滥用或怠于行使体育公共权力的行为。体育腐败可以分为两种情形,一种是利用体育职权为自己或他人谋取不正当利益;另一种情形是虽未获取不正当利益,但滥用或怠于行使体育职权致使他人利益或公共利益受损。体育腐败的本质源于在体育权利与体育权力的博弈过程中体育权利之抑制以及体育权力之嚣长,因此,体育腐败的基本治理应遵循以下两个原则：体育权利张扬原则以及体育权力制约原则。体育制度和体育道德是实现体育权利张扬和体育权力制约最有效之措施,应以体现权利张扬和权力制约的体育制度规范之“硬法”辅之以体育道德伦理的教化和治理之“软法”。     

Questioning the no-touch discourse in physical education from a children's rights perspective

In this paper we question the rationality of ‘no-touch policies’ and offer an alternative approach to the matter of physical contact between teachers and students in the context of physical education (PE) in schools. Earlier research has drawn attention to how a discourse of child protection is starting to affect how physical contact is viewed in PE practice. The avoidance of intergenerational touch is increasingly justified by referring to the children's rights agenda. Here, arguments for ‘no-touching’ are linked to children's right to be protected from harm. In the paper we explore a children's rights-based viewpoint that supports the use of and need for physical contact in PE teaching by developing theoretical and practice-based arguments. An alternative children's rights perspective, based on rights theorising, is used to formulate the theoretical argument. Interviews with 16 PE teachers about their experiences of physical contact in their pedagogical work form the practice-based arguments. The two arguments provide a way of looking at intergenerational touch in education from the vantage point of children's human right to develop to their full potential, which can support a need for physical touch in pedagogical situations.     

Reading the mass violence in Indonesia 1965–1966 as a form of primitive accumulation

Abstract

A human rights perspective is compromised in its ability to understand and respond to the mass violence that took place in Indonesia, largely against members and supporters of the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) from 1965–1966. In “Indonesia's Original Sin: Mass Killings and Capitalist Expansion, 1965–66,” Hilmar Farid makes the point that a human rights standpoint is limited when capital or its various actors, are involved in propagating and/or perpetrating mass violence. In starting to fashion an alternative reading, Farid proposes Marx's notion of primitive accumulation. While Farid's position is suggestive, I contend that his analysis is marred by a number of theoretical weaknesses, which I attempt to sublate in this article. As such, I will offer an alternative reading of primitive accumulation perceived through a multi-dimensional local/global dialectic.     

政治自由的价值反思

政治自由作为政治哲学的基本学理范畴,体现政治哲学的应然性特点。对政治自由进行价值追问和反思,为正确科学理解政治自由这一具有丰富内涵的哲学名词提供理论和实践的参考。     

劳动合同法的经济分析——探讨权利的优化配置

对劳动合同法中相关权利的配置进行经济分析,以权利为媒介,从劳动合同的签订(包括适用期、合同期限)、履行和解除方面,进行成本与收益的分析,探讨权利的优化配置,<劳动合同法>对劳动合同中体现的资源权属的划分和权利的配置进行了调整,有利于保障劳动者的合法权益,促进劳动关系的和谐稳定.