成渝地区双城经济圈国家高新区高质量发展研究

国家高新区是新时期国家发展的创新驱动发展示范区和高质量发展先行区。成都高新区和重庆高新区具有区位环境优势、产业升级有成效、科技赋能有基础、科学城建设有支撑、应用场景有市场、对外开放有实力,整体上科技创新和产业发展拥有良好区域依托,呈现双核引领、多园崛起局面,已成为成渝地区高质量发展的先锋示范,但与国内发达地区相比,仍然面临缺少世界级产业集群和引领型高成长企业、创新动力支撑不足、技术成果转移转化水平不高以及一体化推动机制不完善等问题。研究提出成渝地区双城经济圈国家高新区要进一步高质量发展,亟需建立协同机制,通过合作共建西部科学城,打造成渝产业协同发展示范带和成渝科技创新大走廊,同时不断强化技术创新及创新成果转移转化,推动成渝地区双城经济圈建设成为西部地区具有全国重要影响力的增长极。     

高新技术企业价值评估初探

由于高新技术企业具有不同于一般企业的特点．因此在评估中有很多特殊因素需要考虑,本文介绍了国内及国外在评估高新技术企业时常用的几种方法．在具体运用中还需要结合企业的特点进行仔细选择。     

新产业集群的地区比较及特征分析——以我国三大经济圈为例

本文从长三角、珠三角、环渤海城市圈高新产业集群发展的比较研究出发,总结了三大城市圈高新产业集群发展的特征和经验,以期对武汉城市圈高新产业集群创新发展有所启示。     

Government,venture capital and the growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms

Using a new European Union-sponsored firm-level longitudinal dataset, we assess the impact of government-managed (GVC) and independent venture capital (IVC) funds on the sales and employee growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Our results show that the main statistically robust and economically relevant positive effect is exerted by IVC investors on firm sales growth. Conversely, the impact of GVC alone appears to be negligible. We also find a positive and statistically significant impact of syndicated investments by both types of investors on firm sales growth, but only when led by IVC investors. Our results remain stable after controlling for endogeneity, survivorship bias, reverse causality, anticipation effects, legal and institutional differences across countries and over time and are stable with respect to potential non-linear effects of age and size of entrepreneurial firms. Overall, our analysis casts doubt on the ability of governments to support high-tech entrepreneurial firms through a direct and active involvement in VC markets.     

宽带薪酬在我国高新技术企业研发人员薪酬设计中的适用性分析

宽带薪酬作为一种新型的薪酬设计方法，近年来受到我国企业界和理论界的关注。在相关文献研究基础上，指出了高新技术企业实施宽带薪酬的限制性条件，将高新技术企业及高新技术企业研发人员特点与宽带薪酬的特征结合起来，论述了宽带薪酬对于高新技术企业研友人员薪酬设计的适用性。     

我国高技术服务业区域发展水平综合评价*

作为高技术制造业的延伸和现代服务业的高端环节,高技术服务业对于扩大内需、促进产业转型升级具有重要意义。为了测度我国高技术服务业区域发展水平,本文从基础条件、产业结构、创新投入和创新产出四个维度,构建了包含4个一级指标、18个二级指标的评价指标体系;采用因子分析法提取高技术服务业发展水平的主要因子,并利用基于加权马氏距离改进的聚类分析方法对我国各省、市、自治区的高技术服务业发展水平进行综合评价。结果表明：我国高技术服务业区域发展不平衡,尤其在产业规模、基础条件与创新环境方面差异明显。据此将我国31省、市、自治区的高技术服务业发展水平划分为四个梯队,并分别从政府、各梯队区域内和区域间三个角度提出了政策建议。     

国际企业孵化器——企业孵化器发展的新趋势

随着全球经济一体化趋势的加快,国内市场与国际市场的联系与统一不可避免,技术、劳动力、资本、产品等都将会融入到国际市场中去,作为孵化器发展高级阶段的国际企业孵化器势必成为联系国际市场与国内市场的纽带。国际企业孵化器自企业孵化阶段就面向国际市场,有利于企业在未来的发展中尽早适应国际市场竞争环境。本文在对我国孵化器发展现状剖析的基础上,对我国国际企业孵化器的发展提出了相应的建议。     

University spin-out companies and venture capital

The creation of university spin-out companies that create wealth is a major policy objective of governments and universities. Finance is a catalyst of this wealth creation yet access to venture capital is a major impediment faced by these companies. In this article we adopt a finance pecking order perspective to examine the problems faced by those university spin-out companies seeking to access venture capital. We triangulate evidence from spin-out companies, university technology transfer offices and venture capital firms in the UK and Continental Europe to identify the problems and to suggest policy developments for these parties as well as government. We compare perceptions of high-tech venture capital firms that invest in spin-outs with those that do not, and also consider VCs’ views on spin-outs versus other high-tech firms. Our evidence identifies a mismatch between the demand and supply side of the market. In line with the pecking order theory, venture capitalists prefer to invest after the seed stage. However, in contrast to the pecking order theory, TTOs see venture capital as more important than internal funds early on. We develop policy implications for universities, technology transfer offices, academic entrepreneurs, venture capital firms and government and suggest areas for further research.     

我国高技术产业效率研究述评及展望

高技术产业效率是指一个国家或地区对其高技术产业投入资源的有效配置,对此进行深入研究有利于促进本国经济发展和提升综合国力。通过阅读大量国内外有关文献,本文阐述了我国高技术产业效率的研究现状,指出了现有文献研究的不足之处,从研究方法和研究思路等方面提出了未来的研究发展方向。     

基于多维视角的高科技企业成长机制分析

以高科技企业成长机制分析为主要内容,从高科技企业成长的动力因素、质量变化、能力体现和阶段演进等四个不同的维度视角,构建更为完善的高科技企业成长机制分析框架,系统剖析高科技企业成长因素作用机制。提炼影响高科技企业成长的关键要素与动力因素,反映高科技企业成长的质量变化,凸显高科技企业成长的能力体现,体现高科技企业成长的阶段演进。