需求驱动下高校图书馆智慧信息服务平台设计研究

论文从需求驱动知识流动这一视角出发,构建了高校图书馆内用户与机器、用户与馆员,用户与资源的三种知识流动的组合结构模型,同时在分析智慧信息服务价值特征的基础上设计了高校图书馆智慧信息服务平台的总体结构,旨在为高校图书馆智慧变革提供借鉴。     

科技期刊在线审稿系统应用中的问题及对策

为缩短审稿时间,降低出版时滞,许多科技期刊编辑部相继建立了在线审稿系统.分析科技期刊在线审稿系统应用中存在的问题,并提出对策.     

开放教育试点:《基础会计》教学反思

"中央广播电视大学人才培养模式改革和开放教育试点"项目实施以来取得了丰硕的理论成果,但这种新的人才培养模式在教学实践中也存在一些亟待改进的问题,我们必须正视和关注,并采取相应措施,以保证开放教育的持续发展.     

Evaluation and publication delay in Ibero-American scientific journals

This article analyses the review, acceptance and publication dates of a sample of 21,890 articles from 326 Ibero-American scientific journals from all subject areas and countries included in the Latindex Catalogue 2.0 and published between 2018 and 2020 (freely available as an open access dataset). The aim is to discover evaluation and publication times. The evaluation process takes a median of 110 days, the publication process, a median of 82 days, and the whole process, a median of 224 days. Statistical differences are found according to periodicity, subject areas, countries, existence of a printed version and article type (Call for Papers or General articles). From the data we find that the delay in publication is longer than publishers themselves report to the DOAJ. STEM areas present the most similarity in publication patterns, having a higher number of evaluation days (Ed) than publication days (Pd); Arts and Humanities present the opposite pattern, with a higher Pd than Ed. In the case of Social Sciences, the times are similar. General articles and Call for Papers articles differ in terms of Ed, but not Pd, indicating that Call for Papers revisions are faster.     

质量管理体系评审在高职院校的实践研究

质量管理体系评审是组织的最高管理者评价质量管理体系的适宜性、充分性、有效性和效率的重要方式,是质量管理体系改进循环中最高层次、非常重要的活动。基于ISO9000标准,以兰州石化职业技术学院为例,探讨了高职院校质量管理体系评审的方法,给出了高职院校有效进行质量管理体系评审的实施模式和方法。     

自我同一性理论与测量研究述评

目前有关同一性测量的研究,根据其理论依据的不同可以分为两种取向：一是以玛西亚理论为基础,在探索与承诺两维度下的不断延伸与补充;一是以新的同一性理论如认同风格理论、认同资源理论、认同过程理论等为依据的测量。虽然,其理论点与测量重点不同,但他们的相互配合和补充更能解释青少年同一性形成过程中的不同方面的问题。     

Interventions supporting baccalaureate achievement of Latinx STEM students matriculating at 2-year institutions: A systematic review

Numerous national reports have identified the importance of significantly improving pathways that begin with Latinx students enrolling in 2-year institutions and ultimately completing baccalaureate degrees in STEM fields at 4-year institutions. Many programs using multiple interventions have been designed, implemented, and studied to achieve this goal. To synthesize what has been learned from studies of these programs, this article presents a systematic review of published studies of programs designed to support Latinx student success in 2-year institutions and successful transfer to 4-year institutions, particularly for STEM majors. A total of 49 quantitative, 9 qualitative, and 16 mixed-methods studies published as reports, articles, or dissertations since 1980 were identified that met the criteria for the review. Studies covered a wide range of interventions, including mentoring, counseling, advising, study groups, tutoring, scholarships, orientations, career services, undergraduate research, articulation agreements, and transfer programs. Individually, these studies report positive influences on student success outcomes, including 2- and 4-year graduation, transfer to a 4-year institution, retention, and success in individual courses. However, the number of qualifying studies was surprisingly small, considering the importance of improving success of Latinx students and the length of time during which the problem has been repeatedly emphasized. Few interventions have been undertaken from explicitly assets-based perspectives or theoretical frameworks. The lack of explicit frameworks underlying interventions—combined with a sole/primary focus on students—suggests many interventions were approached from a deficit-based perspective. Further, the study found no pattern of replication studies that might confirm effectiveness of potentially promising interventions. Based on our analysis of evaluations presented in the studies, it does not appear that the research community has developed agreed-upon methods to evaluate commonly agreed-upon outcomes. Finally, no intervention has been sufficiently supported that widespread implementation could be recommended.