本科《物流学》课程考核方式改革实践分析

开卷考试在管理类基础教学中发挥相当大的作用,但实践中仍然遇到学生老师的质疑,影响开卷考试的执行效果。本文从管理学原理的角度就我校管理类课程的考核方式改革的现状作调查分析,并在调查分析的基础上提出开卷考试应用设计的注意要点,帮助大家理解开卷考试在《物流学》中应用的必要性,更好的发挥开卷考试在《物流学》学习中的积极作用。     

开放创新联盟的IT价值共创研究初探——基于资源基础理论

以开放创新联盟为研究背景,以资源基础理论为理论基础,深入分析开放创新联盟IT价值共创的四层含义,分析IT价值共创的产生机制,构建开放创新联盟IT价值共创的理论模型。     

知识产权独占与社会公共利益的调和——以开源运动为视角

知识产权是具有排他性质的垄断权,因而在知识产权法中,存在着知识产权人对知识产品的专有权利与社会公众对知识产品的合法需求之间的矛盾。近年来,知识产权法的合理性不断受到理论质疑和抨击,在实践层面,以开源运动为代表的抵制知识产权的运动也为知识产权制度带来了反思,推动对具有公共商品和私人商品双重属性的知识产品的使用、分配和利益分享作出合理安排,以实现知识产权法的公平正义价值目标。     

混合式评审及其学术效果评析——以《经济研究》杂志为例

[目的]探讨混合式评审是否是期刊论文的较为理想的评审方式。[方法]分析《经济研究》杂志近21年论文引用数据的阶段性差异来比较不同评审方式的效果。[结果]从月平均引用量和前30%高引用文章占总引用比例两个指标来看,混合式评审对于《经济研究》杂志而言优于匿名评审和公开评审。[结论]需要以实证数据为依据,进一步探讨何种评审方式最有利于学术发展。     

《心理学报》开放性同行评审方式探索及初步成效

【目的】 为我国科技期刊进行开放性同行评审提供借鉴和思路。 【方法】 介绍了《心理学报》在开放性同行评审方式上的探索,《心理学报》采用了“开放性同行评审”的一种变式——公开审稿意见。 【结果】 经过充分讨论权衡试用“开放性同行评审”方式的利弊后,《心理学报》最终决定采用“公开审稿意见”这种“开放性同行评审”的变式。 【结论】 除不能达到“缩短发表周期”的目标外,公开审稿意见的方式可以实现“开放性同行评审”的大部分初衷。     

Hybrid Journals: Ensuring Systematic and Standard Discoverability of the Latest Open Access Articles

An important current challenge for research information providers is ensuring the automated discovery of Open Access (OA) content in hybrid journals. We found no evidence of discovery services that are able to systematically identify the crucially important free full-text availability of OA articles regardless of where and how such articles have been published (i.e., in fully OA journals or in hybrid journals). A solution is important because hybrid journals are proliferating and consequently the chances of missing OA articles is real and is happening. Nearly all of the major publishers now provide such journals in order to take advantage of recent changes in research funder requirements, and to be competitive in the new OA business model. By working with a group of scholarly publisher partners and by using standard metadata elements that publishers are already familiar with, we show a systematic and standardized manner to identify OA at the article level. Our proposal is to embed OA-related elements in the metadata freely exposed by publishers for aggregators and discovery services. For example, in the Table of Content (TOC) Really Simple Syndication feeds the publishers use to announce new journal issues and content. Based on the initial results obtained, we discuss the capabilities of our solution, and evaluate the impact produced by our application in the systematic discoverability of OA content from the participating hybrid journals, using an implementation done with the freely available journal current awareness service—JournalTOCs.     

Actions and Updates on the Standards and Best Practices Front

Four standards and best practices recently released or currently underway at the National Information Standards Organization were presented: Knowledge Bases and Related Tools, Presentation and Identification of E-Journals, Open Discovery Initiative, and Open Access Metadata Indicators. Basics outlining the creation work and deliverables were shared for each project. Applicability of these standards and best practices for different stakeholders of the information community were discussed.     

基于开放知识服务的图书馆存在构想

图书馆是一种社会存在物,在开放知识环境下,其本质是图书馆人的劳动生产关系。图书馆人的劳动、再生产是图书馆发展变化的动力之源。图书馆存在是人化的图书馆自然存在与图书馆意识的统一,图书馆人的异化劳动是图书馆进化的表现,而不是图书馆衰败的象征。马克思社会存在论是构建当代图书馆发展支撑体系的理论基础,开放知识服务将是未来图书馆工作的主要内容。     

基于开放式教育背景下高职英语教师角色的探析

在开放式教学过程中,教师不单单只是学生的人生导师、知识的传授者、社会服务者和研究者,在一定制度和环境支持下还应该是校内外课堂的"导演"和"编剧",高职英语教学需要借鉴西方先进的教学方法和教学理念,在宏观和微观两个方面找准自己的角色,进一步深化英语教学改革,创新教学内容和教学方法,努力适应现代高职教育发展需要。     

Let It Flow: The Monopolization of Academic Content Providers and How It Threatens the Democratization of Information

The monopolization of academic journal publishers concentrates power and valuable information into the hands of a few players in the marketplace. It has detrimental effects on how information flows and is accessed. This, in turn, has profound effects on how a nation progresses. Placed in a theoretical framework, utilizing the marketplace of ideas and the economies that coincide, this article takes a look at the history of Elsevier in order to chart this course toward monopolization. It exhibits the effect it has already had on the academic community, while offering two models of Open Access as a much sounder option.