2003年我国急诊医学期刊发表的基金类论文分析

通过对全国10种急诊医学专业期刊2003年载文总量及各类基金资助立项研究论文的统计分析,窥测急诊医学学科的发展水平和研究动向。结果：10种期刊共载文3111篇．其中基金类项目论文453篇,分布在中国危重病急诊医学、中国急救医学、中华急诊医学杂志等8种期刊上：对其中7种急诊医学专业统计源期刊评价体系指标的分析,上述3种期刊论文的总被引频次和影响因子均大于各学科、各专业统计源期刊的平均值,并都进入一个以上国际检索系统。结论：在我国起步较晚的急诊医学二级学科,近年来发展较快,但整体水平和研究质量还有待于提高。     

研究生开题之信息技能导航研究——以生命科学研究生开题为例

研究生开题是学位论文工作的起始,信息资料的收集、整理、归纳与综合是开题的前提与基础。文章介绍研究生如何快速、准确、全面地获取信息资源,如何独立、有效、准确地解决研究中的实际问题,根据开题阶段的特点,将研究生开题之信息基础技能和晋级技能融入实践中,描绘研究生开题的信息技能导航图。     

新建本科院校毕业论文指导应对策略

新建本科院校毕业论文存在诸多问题,为了有效提高高等教育质量,需要加强毕业论文的指导和管理,因此,从完善学校制度建设、发挥学生主体性、提高指导教师的监督作用等方面对现有毕业论文指导模式进行改进,切实提高新建本科院校毕业论文的质量.     

大学生学位论文撰写期间的信息行为对论文质量的影响

为了解大学生在学位论文撰写期间的信息行为对论文质量的影响,以广西工学院本科生为研究样本,通过问卷调查收集大学生在学位论文撰写期间的信息行为及其论文的成绩,利用SPSS对两者的关系进行分析研究。结果表明：毕业生在学位论文撰写期间,利用图书馆的频度越高,对提高论文成绩的作用越大;电子学位论文信息、互联网信息、印刷型图书信息对完成学位论文有重要的作用;学术组织和协会网站的信息对论文撰写有非常重要的意义;与他人交流和引文是获取论文撰写所需信息的重要途径;每周上网查资料的天数对论文质量的影响很小。     

Balancing knowing and not-knowing: an exploration of doctoral candidates’ performance of researcher selves in the dissertation defence

This paper explores how 11 Canadian doctoral candidates performed as researchers in the final doctoral oral examination in handling questions that they identified as ‘difficult to answer’. Drawing from communities of practice theory, the study views the defence as an examination in which a novice researcher (the doctoral candidate) demonstrates knowing to a group of experienced researchers (the defence committee) in order to be approved of the membership of a scholarly community. The doctoral candidate’s researcher identity is considered as composed of three aspects: thinking about oneself as, performing as and being thought of as a researcher. It was found that many (41%) of the questions were difficult because of the questioners’ different perspectives on the dissertation; in answering them, the candidates balanced knowing and not-knowing by navigating across research areas/fields, methodological and epistemological borders. All the defences were successful, which indicate that these candidates were all thought of as competent researchers; yet, only those who thought about themselves as novice researchers felt satisfied with their performance.     

关于本科毕业论文(设计)抄袭现象的思考与对策

通过网络对本科毕业论文(设计)进行了检索比对,指出“文献引用不规范”等5种情况是造成重复率高(抄袭)的主要原因.在不考虑学生诚信等主观因素的前提下,分析指出教学资源不足和教学管理不完善是造成重复率高(抄袭)的客观原因,并提出了解决问题的针对性方案.     

教育研究与科学研究——兼论研究生论文指导

教育科学属于社会科学,社会科学与自然科学一样是科学,由此实验科学的实证、假设可以成为教育研究的重要方法,科学哲学的融通、革新观念应当成为教育理论建设重要理念,科学家品性也必须成为教育研究者基本素质。目前需要从研究生阶段理解科学研究,提高科学素质。     

论中国古代悼亡诗的伤逝主题及价值取向

悼亡文学是祭悼活动发展到一定阶段的产物 ,其起源与发展从一开始就受社会文化、民族心理、地理环境等因素的影响和制约。悼亡作品中创作主体的情感通常表现为一定的模式 ,这些情感模式展示了传统的爱情观 ,特别是对失落的爱情的态度。而悼亡作品的价值取向又表现了传统的爱情价值观和自我价值观的统一。悼亡作品中独特的情感表达模式和价值取向共同构建起了悼亡文学有别于其它文学的个性特征     

研究生学位论文拆分发表问题探析——由“学术不端文献检测系统”检测结果所想到的

分析中国知网中学位论文全文数据库的出版性质,认为《中国博士学位论文全文数据库（CDFD）》和《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库（CMFD）》是正式出版的学术电子期刊,先发学位论文后发拆分论文属于重复发表,先发拆分论文后发学位论文属于正常出版,建议研究生先发拆分论文后发学位论文全文。     

Preparing doctoral candidates for the viva: issues for students and supervisors

The PhD viva has been described as mysterious (Burnham 1994 Burnham, P. 1994. Surviving the doctoral viva: Unravelling the mystery of the Ph.D. oral. Journal of Graduate Education, 1: 30–34.  [Google Scholar]; Morley et al. 2002 Morley, L., Leonard, D. and David, M. 2002. Variations in vivas: Quality and equality in British PhD assessments. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3): 263–273. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), unpredictable (Rugg & Petre 2004 Rugg, G. and Petre, M. 2004. The unwritten rules of PhD research, Maidenhead: Open University Press.  [Google Scholar]) and potentially frightening for students (Delamont et al. 2004 Delamont, S., Atkinson, P. and Parry, O. 2004. Supervising the doctorate: A guide to success, Maidenhead: Open University Press.  [Google Scholar]), with its form and duration a function of the predilections of individual examiners as well as a function of differences across disciplines. Despite its myriad manifestations, the PhD viva voce (live voice), as oral examination of the doctoral thesis, constitutes the final ‘test’ of the PhD endeavour. In the UK, this is a private event, though in some countries such as Belgium and the Netherlands, for example, the viva is conducted in a public arena (Delamont et al. 2004 Delamont, S., Atkinson, P. and Parry, O. 2004. Supervising the doctorate: A guide to success, Maidenhead: Open University Press.  [Google Scholar]). Although there is no standard or prescribed format, students across all disciplines can expect to defend their thesis through a process involving questioning, clarification and discussion of key elements. This critical commentary discusses a number of issues that inform the preparation of students, focusing on the role of the internal and external examiner, the viva voce process, guidance for students and some practical suggestions for supervisors and students, particularly the value of full role-play in building students’ confidence. The extent to which the doctoral viva, in its current ‘secret’ form, can be seen as a fully accountable and independently rigorous process is taken up in the conclusion that highlights the phenomenon of ‘cosy’ reciprocal examining arrangements, the spectre of litigation when things go wrong and the need to consider a fundamental review of both the purpose and conduct of the viva.