Statistical investigation measuring intelligence and creativity

The use of statistical investigations as a teaching strategy have been shown to both motivate and engage students. The implementation of a statistical investigation to measure intelligence is described, covering core statistical principles and key elements of research design.     

理工院校科技创新人才培养模式的思考

高校是科技进步和人才培养的结合点,创新人才的培养已成为我国高校的一项基本职能。本文借鉴各理工院校在培养大学生科技创新人才方面积累的成功经验,尝试利用学校资源,积极探索大学生科技创新人才培养模式的新思路,构建全程式大学生科研训练体系。     

科学发展观视野下的社会主义新农村建设

党的十七大报告全面深刻地阐明了科学发展观的历史地位和科学内涵,并把科学发展观作为发展中国特色社会主义事业必须长期坚持和贯彻的重大战略思想。从此,科学发展观不仅成为我国经济社会发展的重要指导方针,而且也为我国当前社会主义新农村建设指明方向。因此,我国新农村建设要以科学发展观为统领,坚持第一要义是发展,开创农村现代化建设新局面;坚持以人为本为核心,实现人民群众共享发展成果;坚持全面发展为要求,促进农村全方位繁荣新成就;坚持持续发展为导向,树立农村可持续发展新理念;坚持统筹兼顾为方法,构建城乡一体化发展新格局。     

“一带一路”科技创新合作促进城市产业升级——基于PSM-DID方法的实证研究

采用281个地级市2008至2017年的经济面板数据,运用倾向得分匹配法(PSM)和双重差分法(DID)检验"一带一路"科技创新合作对节点城市产业升级的影响。结果表明,"一带一路"科技创新合作对节点城市产业合理化有显著的促进作用,但是对产业结构高级化作用不显著。此外,相比沿海节点城市,"一带一路"区域科技合作对内陆节点城市产业结构转型升级的作用更明显。政策机制甄别结果显示,对外贸易、人均收入和财政支出促进了"一带一路"科技合作战略对节点城市产业结构合理化的影响,金融发展水平会显著促进节点城市产业高级化程度。     

科研项目采购探讨 ——以聚变堆主机关键系统综合研究设施项目为例

通过对科研项目相关理论的研究,以科研项目采购管理为主线,介绍我国"十三五"规划的国家大科学工程聚变堆主机项目的基本概况和特点,以及该项目依托单位中国科学院等离子体物理研究所科研项目采购管理的发展、流程、运行机制等;以聚变堆主机项目为例,对科研项目采购现状和存在问题进行分析,重点阐述科研项目的独立性特点,提出科研项目独立采购的思路,并对聚变堆主机项目采购管理实施方案及策略提出若干建议,以促进提高科研项目管理质量、提升项目团队的核心竞争力。     

基于大数据的科技创新成果精准转化模式研究

通过研究科技成果转化的模式和现状,分析基于大数据的科技创新成果转化平台的结构、要素、特征,研究提出通过科技创新成果精准转化模式来提高高校和科研院所科技创新成果的转化效率。     

财政科技投入、全要素生产率与广东省经济发展不平衡

随着“一核一带一区”发展战略规划的发布,广东省经济发展不平衡成为亟需解决的问题。本文以全要素生产率作为切入点,通过提高不发达地区全要素生产率来缩小区域经济差距。本文用对2001-2017年广东省21地市的面板数据做了实证分析,研究表明财政科技投入对全要素生产率有显著的正向影响。因此政府可通过调整财政科技投入结构来缩小全要素生产率发展差距。     

“互联网+”时代背景下“科研思路与方法”教学模式探讨

当前,国家对大学本科的教育愈发重视,提出了多种教改方案。面对“互联网+”快速发展的形势,文章分析了“互联网+”时代背景下“科研思路与方法”新型教学模式的优势以及如何高效率地构建。通过教师、学生、互联网三者协调配合以及师生的线上互动交流和讨论,可以充分调动学生独立思考、自主学习的积极性,同时增加了教学趣味性,提高了教学质量。     

A Geohistorical Study of ‘The Rise of Modern Science’: Mapping Scientific Practice Through Urban Networks, 1500–1900

Using data on the ‘career’ paths of one thousand ‘leading scientists’ from 1450 to 1900, what is conventionally called the ‘rise of modern science’ is mapped as a changing geography of scientific practice in urban networks. Four distinctive networks of scientific practice are identified. A primate network centred on Padua and central and northern Italy in the sixteenth century expands across the Alps to become a polycentric network in the seventeenth century, which in turn dissipates into a weak polycentric network in the eighteenth century. The nineteenth century marks a huge change of scale as a primate network centred on Berlin and dominated by German-speaking universities. These geographies are interpreted as core-producing processes in Wallerstein’s modern world-system; the rise of modern scientific practice is central to the development of structures of knowledge that relate to, but do not mirror, material changes in the system.

The Joint Establishment of the World Federation of Scientific Workers and of UNESCO After World War II

The World Federation of Scientific Workers (WFScW) and UNESCO share roots in the Social Relations of Science (SRS) movements and in the Franco-British scientific relations which developed in the 1930s. In this historical context (the Great Depression, the rise of Fascism and the Nazi use of science, the social and intellectual fascination for the USSR), a new model of scientific internationalism emerged, where science and politics mixed. Many progressive scientists were involved in the war efforts against Nazism, and tried to prolong their international commitments into peacetime. They contributed to the establishment of the WFScW and of UNESCO in 1945–1946. Neither the WFScW nor UNESCO succeeded in achieving their initial aims. Another world emerged from the immediate post-war years, but it was not the world fancied by the progressive scientists from the mould of scientific internationalism. The aim of this article is to follow the path from the Franco-British networks towards the establishment of the WFScW and UNESCO; from an ideological scientific internationalism towards practical projects. It is to understand how these two bodies came to embody two different scientific internationalisms during the Cold War.