Bibliometric approximation of a scientific specialty by combining key sources,title words,authors and references

Bibliometric methods for the analysis of highly specialized subjects are increasingly investigated and debated. Information and assessments well-focused at the specialty level can help make important decisions in research and innovation policy. This paper presents a novel method to approximate the specialty to which a given publication record belongs. The method partially combines sets of key values for four publication data fields: source, title, authors and references. The approach is founded in concepts defining research disciplines and scholarly communication, and in empirically observed regularities in publication data. The resulting specialty approximation consists of publications associated to the investigated publication record via key values for at least three of the four data fields. This paper describes the method and illustrates it with an application to publication records of individual scientists. The illustration also successfully tests the focus of the specialty approximation in terms of its ability to connect and help identify peers. Potential tracks for further investigation include analyses involving other kinds of specialized publication records, studies for a broader range of specialties, and exploration of the potential for diverse applications in research and research policy context.     

浅谈电子技术实验教学改革

针对提高学员的3种能力进行电子技术实验的教学改革,根据实验教改的设计思路,介绍了实验教改的实施方案及实施过程,可以充分发挥学员的潜能,培养学员的创新能力。     

Spontaneous spatial strategy use in learning from scientific text

Two studies explored the role of the spontaneous use of spatial note-taking strategies (i.e., creating maps and drawings) and spatial ability in learning from a scientific passage. In Study 1, college students read and took notes by hand on a 10-paragraph scientific passage about the human respiratory system. Students tended to use verbal strategies such as lists (on 48% of the paragraphs), outlines (29%) and running text (15%), but also used spatial strategies such as maps (28%) and drawings (11%). Regression analyses indicated that spatial ability and the use of spatial strategies (maps or drawings) significantly predicted learning outcomes, with spatial strategy use explaining additional variance beyond spatial ability. In Study 2, students read the same scientific passage and took notes either by hand on paper (paper group), by hand on a large whiteboard (whiteboard group), or on a laptop computer (computer group). A similar general pattern as Study 1 was found for the paper group, but this pattern was not found for the computer or whiteboard groups, suggesting that the relationships found in Study 1 might depend on the note-taking medium. Results also indicated that students in the paper and whiteboard groups spontaneously used more spatial strategies, whereas the computer group tended to use verbal strategies (i.e., words only), suggesting that different note-taking contexts encourage different strategies.     

Divergent production in gifted adolescents using timed vs. untimed stimuli with creative prompting

Although creativity and expertise are related, they are nonetheless very different things. Expertise does not usually require creativity, but creativity generally does require a certain level of expertise. There are similarities in the relationships of both expertise and creativity to domains, however. Research has shown that just as expertise in one domain does not predict expertise in other, unrelated domains, creativity in one domain does not predict creativity in other, unrelated domains. People may be expert, and people may be creative, in many domains, or they may be expert, or creative, in few domains or none at all, and one cannot simply transfer expertise, or creativity, from one domain to another, unrelated domain. The domain specificity of creativity matters crucially for creativity training, creativity assessment, creativity research, and creativity theory. The domain specificity of creativity also means that interdisciplinary thinking, interdisciplinary collaboration, and interdisciplinary creativity are even more important than one would assume if creativity were domain general.     

试论课堂教学与学生创新素质的培养

课堂教学从导入艺术性，提问的艺术性、教学方法、组织课堂的艺术性、课堂教具辅助教学、因材施教方面，培养学生探索、好奇、质疑、兴趣、想象、思维观察能力和个性发展等创新素质。     

"与时俱进"的时代意义

“与时俱进”作为党的思想路线的重要内容,具有重要的时代意义：它体现了社会主体一种积极进取的精神状态;深化了对科学发展观的认识;进一步强调了创新的理念和思想方法。     

高校思想政治理论课新课程改革的理论与实践

从理论研究与实践两个角度对高校思想政治理论课新课程改革的政治背景加以回顾，探讨全面把握新课程的新体系、新思路和新要求，并结合具体实践对如何实施好思想政治理论课提出了看法。     

试论艺术教育新理念

传统的艺术教育理念认为,艺术教育主要是培养人的综合艺术能力。随着时代的发展,这一传统理念已不适应艺术发展的需求。新理念认为:在培养人的综合艺术能力的同时,还应培养人们的整合创新、开拓贯通和跨域转换的多种能力,以促进人的全面发展。     

高等学校培养高层次创新人才的探索

创新人才的本质特征是创造性，创新人才还具有其独特的人格特征及个性心理结构。高等学校为了培养和造就大批高层次创新人才，就必须以创新为核心目标，进行整体、系统和综合的改革：转变教育思想和观念；改革课程体系：突出大学生创新能力的培养；创设有利于大学生创造性发展的学习环境；塑造大学生的创造性人格；增强高校教师的创新精神，提高高校教师自身的创新能力。     

高师数学教学中如何实施素质教育的几点探讨

本简述数学素质教训在素质教育中的作用及实施素质教育进行的五种转变。