基于主题依托教学的阅读教学模式研究

首先构建了一个基于主题依托教学（Theme-based Instruction,简称TBI）阅读教学模式,然后通过教学实验、问卷调查和个人访谈等手段对其有效性进行科学评估。研究发现：TBI阅读教学模式有利于培养学生的英语学习情感,提高其阅读技能和阅读水平,但还存在形式关注不足、阅读量过大等问题。解决的措施为：指导学生学习词汇和处理难句的方法、在查找文章环节给学生提供帮助、培养学生查找资料的能力等。     

项目驱动教学模式下的商务英语信函写作实践研究

本研究是对商务英语信函写作课程进行的一项教学实践研究,旨在探讨基于项目驱动教学模式改革商务英语专业课程教学的可行性。文章从项目驱动教学的理论基础和主要特点入手,结合商务英语信函写作教学改革实例,阐述实施项目驱动教学的具体方法,对商务英语信函写作课程实施项目驱动教学的理论和实践进行了深入的探索。     

Adventures in Flipping College Algebra

Abstract

This paper outlines the experience of a university professor who implemented flipped learning in two sections of college algebra courses for two semesters. It details how the courses were flipped, what technology was used, advantages, challenges, and results. It explains what students do outside of class, what they do inside class, and discusses what students thought of the course based on surveys and course evaluations. It also compares results on a similar final exam to those of a control group.     

Fostering Instructor Knowledge of Student Thinking Using The Flipped Classroom

Abstract

In this article, we share a model of flipped instruction that allowed us to gain a window into our students’ mathematical thinking. We depict how that increased awareness of student thinking shaped our mathematics instruction in productive ways. Drawing on our experiences with students in our own classrooms, we show how flipped instruction can be used to design experiences that help students make sense of mathematics during class sessions.     

输入加工和输出驱动下的语法教学对比研究

语法是语言的基本组成部分,语法能力决定着语言使用者的语言能力,如何使外语学习者更好地掌握语法是外语教学的核心问题。目前语法教学的方法主要分为两大类,一类研究强调语言输入,另一类研究则侧重语言输出。该文旨在分析国内外语法教学研究,比较语法教学手段及其习得效果的差异,认为外语语法教学的输入加工型教学法和意义型输出教学法的效果有待于课堂教学实证研究来进一步论证。     

平面设计类网络课程的教学交互研究

网络课程教学交互水平的质量决定了网络教学效果。针对目前平面设计类网络课程存在的问题,分析网络教学交互理论,构建基于项目引导的"主导—主体"平面设计类网络课程教学交互模式。在分析学生特点、课程性质及教学目标的基础上,结合媒介从教学内容、教学支持两方面开展教学交互设计,以期为网络课程教学质量提供保障。     

Supporting emotion regulation in individuals with ASD,ADHD and bipolar disorder through trauma-informed instruction and self-regulation strategies

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, students have endured drastic changes in educational routines. Such disruptions can be especially challenging for students who struggle with executive functioning, self-regulation and emotion regulation, such as students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and bipolar disorder. Using a framework of trauma-informed instruction, the authors supported classroom teachers in implementing sensory spaces for students with ASD, ADHD and bipolar disorder. The project included professional development and funding for teachers to develop, procure and offer sensory tools and strategies to assist students in recognising and managing emotions. The authors collected data on the effectiveness of the sensory supports, combining teacher surveys and student behaviour data. Results indicated increased teacher knowledge on trauma-informed instruction and use of sensory supports to promote executive functioning and self-regulation and decreased target behaviours in students based on structured observation and anecdotal teacher feedback.     

Let's talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction

Many studies investigating inquiry learning in science domains have appeared over the years. Throughout this period, inquiry learning has been regularly criticized by scholars who favor direct instruction over inquiry learning. In this vein, Zhang, Kirschner, Cobern, and Sweller (2022) recently asserted that direct instruction is overall superior to inquiry-based instruction and reproached policy makers for ignoring this fact. In the current article we reply to this assertion and the premises on which it is based. We review the evidence and argue that a more complete and correct interpretation of the literature demonstrates that inquiry-based instruction produces better overall results for acquiring conceptual knowledge than does direct instruction. We show that this conclusion holds for controlled, correlational, and program-based studies. We subsequently argue that inquiry-based and direct instruction each have their specific virtues and disadvantages and that the effectiveness of each approach depends on moderating factors such as the learning goal, the domain involved, and students' prior knowledge and other student characteristics. Furthermore, inquiry-based instruction is most effective when supplemented with guidance that can be personalized based on these moderating factors and can even involve providing direct instruction. Therefore, we posit that a combination of inquiry and direct instruction may often be the best approach to support student learning. We conclude that policy makers rightfully advocate inquiry-based instruction, particularly when students’ investigations are supplemented with direct instruction at appropriate junctures.     

浅论如何上好初中中长跑课

中长跑内容是中学体育课的重要组成部分。如何上好初中中长跑课,它对学生的身体锻炼和体育中考具有非常重要的意义,首先要消除学生对中长跑存在的害怕心理,培养对中长跑课的兴趣。再采用多种形式练习及改进教学方法,进行有效、科学地教学。