英语听力能力的真实性评价

本文回顾了近几年关于真实性评价的研究成果,以此为基础,通过对真实性评价内涵和实施原则的解读,选取并结合英语听力这一方面,初步展示了如何在英语听力教学具体听前,听中和听后不同阶段中运用真实性评价来提高学生听力的能力．     

大学英语四级听力答题策略技巧

大学英语四级考试听力比重增加,难度加大。本文对以2014年真题为例,对听力各题型进行了具体分析,并提出了相应的一些答题策略和技巧。     

大学英语四级听力题型特点分析及技巧训练

大学英语四级考试听力占据整体比重较大,也是考生的薄弱环节。本文对听力各题型进行了具体分析,并提出了相应的一些答题技巧和训练方法,以帮助考生提高成绩。     

大学英语听力课中的任务训练

培养学习者自主学习与创新能力是近20年来外语教学界的热门话题.本文探讨了与提高自主学习与创新能力密切相关的任务训练问题.首先分析任务的内涵和分类,然后探讨任务训练的主要模式,强调任务训练的必要性.提出了通过对大学一年级学生进行任务训练,不但可以提高学生的听力水平,而且还可提高学生的自主学习与创新能力.     

Listening Barriers Among Chinese Students And Training Tactics

Listening is an important means of language learning. It is one of the important ways in Englishlanguage communication. According to Rivers study indications, listening occupies 45% of the whole socialinteractions. From this, we can see that a good listening can help to improve students'ability of languageunderstanding. And some statistics show that nearly 50% students regard listening comprehension as themost difficult part among all kinds of examinations. Where are their barriers? How to t…     

大学生英语听力理解的问题及对策

听、说、读、写是英语学习中的四种基本语言能力。“听”在语言环境中占有极其重要的位置，起着“主导”作用。但在实际的英语学习中，听力却是大学生的薄弱环节。提高听力理解水平，要纠正学生发言，灌输必要的词汇知识；加强对英美化背景知识的导入；培养学生的模仿能力；精听与泛听相结合。     

英语听力教学中教师的作用

文章运用外语学习理论的研究成果。论述了教师在外语教学中的主要作用是：通过引导学生充分利用有利因素的促进作用、避免不利因素的阻碍作用，帮助他们有效获得目标语能力。在听力教学中，这主要表现在四个方面：(一)调动学习者积极的情感因素；(二)提供可理解输入；(三)训练学生听的方法；(四)帮助学生发现习得问题。提供解决问题的建设性意见。     

Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 83first – and 81 fourth graders at the end of theschool year to examine factors accounting forearly reading performance in Finnish, atransparent orthography with a clear mapping ofphonemes onto graphemes. Measures for bothgrades included reading comprehension, phonemeawareness, and object- and digit naming.Additionally measures of skills in morphology,spelling and a screening battery wereadministered to the first graders. The sets ofmeasures accounted for 56% of the variance inreading performance in first grade and 64% infourth grade. Phoneme awareness was stronglyrelated to reading performance and spelling atthe end of first grade, but only forless-skilled readers in fourth grade. Theseresults suggest a larger role for phonemeawareness for children learning a transparentorthography than has been suggested in earlierstudies. At the same time, listeningcomprehension contributed more strongly tofirst-grade reading performance than has beenreported for children learning to readEnglish.     

听力教学的制约因素和对策研究

听力是一项重要的语言技能，是语言输入的主要途径之一。良好的英语听力是学好英语的前提和基础。本文提出了解决外国语学校听力教学制约因素的对策，并探讨了解决这些问题的对策，旨在不断提高学生的听力水平。     

The Contribution of Naming Speed to the Simple View of Reading

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether naming speed makes a contribution to the prediction of reading comprehension, after taking into account the product of word decoding and listening comprehension (i.e., the Simple View of Reading; [Gough, P.B. & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Remedial and Special Education 7, 6–10]), and phonological awareness. In grade 3, word decoding was measured with the Woodcock [(1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests – Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services]. Word Identification and Word Attack subtests, listening comprehension with the Woodcock (1991) [Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery – Revised. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company] test of Listening Comprehension, naming speed with a picture naming task, and 4 measures assessed phonological awareness. Reading comprehension was assessed in grades 3, 4, and 5 with the Woodcock (1998) Passage Comprehension subtest and in grade 5 with the Gates–MacGinitie reading test. The Simple View was evaluated twice: first, with a pseudoword measure for decoding (Grapheme–Phoneme-conversion product) and, second, with a word identification measure for decoding (word recognition product). Hierarchical regression and commonality analyses indicated that the decoding and listening comprehension products accounted for considerable variance in reading comprehension. Naming speed had a small but significant effect after accounting for the Grapheme–Phoneme-conversion product (2–3%), but little effect after accounting for the word-recognition product (0–2%). Subgroup analyses indicated that naming speed had its primary effect for less able readers. Commonality analyses supported the interpretation that naming speed contributes after the Grapheme–Phoneme-conversion product but not after the word recognition product because naming speed has already had its effect upon word recognition. These results indicate that it is important how the Simple View decoding term is defined, and that the Simple View may be incomplete, especially for less able readers.