高校图书馆协同管理平台建设探究

随着信息技术和信息化管理的高速发展,高校图书馆的管理也面临着新的管理模式、管理方法和管理手段。文章结合当前技术发展和图书馆管理,探讨了高校图书馆在协同管理平台建设的目标、原则、内容,以及安全管理和控制。     

基于协同创新的地方高校研究生培养模式

当前我国研究生培养中出现了协同创新教育理念未达成共识、研究生培养目标与社会需求偏差、校内外条块分割局面未完全打破、协同创新的研究生培养机制尚未健全等问题,提出基于协同创新的地方高校研究生培养必须树立研究生教育协同创新理念、厘清各创新主体利益诉求、协同打造联合培养利益共同体、建立健全协同创新运行机制、探索协同培养研究生模式,保障研究生教育健康持续发展等策略。     

协同创新共建共享精品资源共享课机制的研究与实践

主要分析了在社会转型背景下,为促进高等教育适应社会发展,推进教育资源开放共享的必要性。重点研究在MOOCs大力发展的今天,如何建设具有中国特色的精品资源共享课。在建设辽宁省精品资源共享课《软件工程》的过程中,提出了在“学校不分大小,资源不论多少,平等互利,自觉自愿”原则基础上,实现学科间、高校间、校企间协同共建精品资源共享课的模式。同时探讨了通过跨校修读课程、建立符合国情的开放课程知识产权体系、“自上而下”和“自下而上”相结合的评价和监督机制的精品资源共享课的共享模式。     

系统工程视角下的研究生协同创新教育模式

实现“研究生教育创新计划”目标,必须从根本上改变研究生教育的模式。作为一项系统工程,研究生教育系统是一个四维时空结构：时间维,空间（环境）维,主体维,活动维,协同创新是该结构中的四大主体与四大系统相互激励、共谋共赢的理想结果。课程体系和考核评价体系是关键子系统,创新的基因嵌于其中。     

What makes a cMOOC community endure? Multiple participant perspectives from diverse cMOOCs

Imagine the challenge of being immersed in a dynamic learning network where you play brinkmanship with being overwhelmed by a plethora of information, comments, and conversations on a topic of intense interest to you. Through adept facilitation, the comments and encouragement of fellow participants, and your own perseverance, you develop a network of personal connections which serve as metaphorical flying buttresses creating enough stability that you are able to learn in a new, yet profoundly meaningful way – the connectivist massive open online course (cMOOC) way. Through the lens of autoethnography, five seasoned educators collaboratively reflect on their motivation for participating in their initial cMOOC. They analyze their lived experience, what they found most engaging, and most importantly, they grapple with why cMOOC communities often endure past official end-dates. This article attempts to provide insight into the thrill and depth of learning and connection possible through participation in cMOOCs.     

Let’s Meet in Nepantla: The Possibility of Thirdspace as a Place “Others” Call Home

This autoethnography posits that my presence as a working-class Chicana obtaining an education in the United States consequently created a Thirdspace environment I recognize as Nepantla. Thirdspace allowed me to navigate urban schooling and elite institutions of higher education. Two narratives demonstrate opposing forms of acquired dominant and nondominant forms of cultural capital to interrogate the value of Thirdspace when considering unique knowledge generated by an insider along the margins. This article articulates that strategic construction of bridges into Nepantla may assist Latino students to successfully navigate the schooling experience and offer the potential to reframe educational discourse.     

协同创新视阈下高职院校科研团队组织模式研究

协同创新是新时期对创新的一种深入解读,高职院校在协同创新体系中具有重要的地位与作用。高职院校科研团队存在发展封闭、管理松散、绩效考核有待提高等问题。协同创新具有的协同性、共享性、高效性、持续性四个特点,可优化现有科研团队的组织模式。面向协同创新的科研团队优化组织模式可分为四类：基于项目的团队模式、基于共同体的团队模式、基于实体的团队模式、基于联盟的团队模式。     

协同视域下的高职院校文化产业人才培养与产教融合研究

我国文化产业的快速发展对人才培养提出了更高要求,协同视域为产教融合下的高职院校文化产业专业人才培养提供了有效的实践路径。协同视域下的高职院校文化产业人才培养,应以生产与教学协同为基础,建立科学的人才培养体系;应立足于区域协同发展战略,确立院校文化产业专业人才培养特色;应格外重视“人”的关键要素作用,开创校企合作全面协同机制。产教融合不是高职教育的新概念,但产教融合的全过程协同与全要素效率提升,值得包括文化产业专业在内的学界和业界持续深入研究。     

Academic leisure crafting: More than a respite to breath?

In the context of the increased frustration and anxiety around managerialism of universities, this article explores how a group of 11 academics, from three different universities, diverse disciplines and levels are responding collectively outside of their work. Moreover, it tracks the enactment of the ‘Slow Swimming Club’, initiated by the author and jointly participated in and shaped by these academics. The club represents a particular form of leisure crafting, called slow swimming. Using an autoethnographic approach, the impact of the Slow Swimming Club was explored over a 10-year period. The article reflects on the initial effect of this practice, around an individualised compensatory respite from the academics’ feelings of frustration and insecurity. This respite was framed in terms of temporal and aesthetic task crafting. The article then reflects on how the external, counter-performative nature of leisure crafting has opened up time and space for job crafting, back in their universities. The differentiating feature of this research is around the role of academic agency in moving beyond respite towards structural contestation and more systemic change. It also highlights the importance of the relationship between leisure and work within this crafting process. Through placing the aesthetic and temporal dimensions in the foreground, the article offers a significant conceptual contribution to crafting typology. It also extends slow scholarship, by advocating an embodied, sensual and experiential response to the fast pedagogies of managerialism.