大学生就业不公平问题探析

大学生就业不公平容易导致社会阶层趋于固化,使人力资本错位配置,不利于高等教育的健康发展。分析大学生就业不公平现象的形成机理,教育筛选功能失效为其发生前提,行业、职业间待遇不公平为外部条件,社会资本有利群体对高收益工作岗位的追逐为内部动力,而社会资本有利群体利用社会屏蔽使招聘程序合法化是其实现路径。破解此问题需要转变高等教育发展方式,强化教育的筛选功能;创建统一的劳动力市场,使各行业待遇公平化;加强职业准入制度建设,提高职业的专业化水平。     

论孟子之"义"

孟子所倡导的仁义学说是从孔子的仁礼学说发展而来的,他首次提出人本性之中存有仁义礼智四端。孟子学说的核心是仁义,其中义是判断一切事物最核心的标准,是指对内在道德修养的要求。     

A critical analysis of the Syrian refugee education policies in Lebanon using a policy analysis framework

ABSTRACT

Lebanon, a country impacted by ongoing political and economic instability, has an estimated 1.5 million Syrian refugees competing for access to already fragile healthcare, education and labor sectors. Half of these refugees are children. This piece will discuss the efforts and policies Lebanon already has in place regarding the education of Syrian refugees. This will be done through the implementation of Lesley Vidovich’s (2007) a policy framework which proposes an analysis of the policy context and policies’ influence, an analysis of the policies as text as well as an analysis of the implementation of those policies. Such a framework has the opportunity to not only provide a holistic view of the Lebanese history and context leading to current policies surrounding the education of refugees, but it has the potential of serving as a systematic framework for other various contexts concerning education in conflict areas.     

论公民正义感的培养

公民正义感的缺失对任何国家来说，都是一个不容忽视的伦理现象和社会问题。加强对公民正义感的培养，有利于社会的安全运行和健康发展。我国当前社会正义感缺失的原因可以从政治、经济、社会环境以及道德主体心理等多方面进行分析。正义感只有在正义行为的实践中才能得到高度体现，公民正义感的培养也只有在社会实践过程中才能实现。     

论我国立法模式下程序正义的设立

正义是人类普遍认为的崇高价值,具有公正性、合理性,人们追求正义,同样也追求程序正义。而当前研究程序正义,往往是从操作层面和正义价值论上研究,研究制度改革,忽略从立法角度探讨程序正义设立。立法模式下程序正义,就是以立法视角对法律制定的过程中可能影响程序正义的因素进行分析、判断,从而揭示立法对程序正义的影响,进而制定出具有正义性的法律程序。本文以立法模式下程序正义设立的概念为基础,分析我国立法模式下程序正义设立的现状,以期说明立法对程序正义的影响;从司法者的价值、司法职业群体和法治建设等方面进行理性探究,引起人们对立法模式下程序正义重要性和必要性的认识。     

Shame: Does it have a place in an education for democratic citizenship?

Shame, shame management and reintegrative shaming feature in some restorative justice literature, and may have implications for schools. Restorative justice in schools is effective when perpetrators of wrong-doing can accept and take ownership of their wrongful acts, are appropriately remorseful, and seek to make amends. Shame may be understood as an ethical matter if it is regarded to arise because of the contradiction between the wrongful act and the individual’s sense of self and self-worth. Shame management (that is, seeking reintegrative over stigmatising shaming) can be regarded to reflect a form of social responsibility as it contributes to community restoration by repairing ruptured social relationships. The notion of shaming and acknowledgement of harm thus assumes norms of acceptable community behaviour, attitudes and relationships, and is therefore also an ethical matter. Successful restorative practices in schools depend on the school-wide existence and practice of such norms, and mesh with virtues education, stimulated by the contemporary demand of many national curricula to promote so-called key competencies. Although the concepts of restorative justice and reintegrative shaming serve as a context for this article, its chief impetus was provided by an evaluative study of a group of New Zealand schools, in the course of which notions such as shame, reintegration and exclusion became evident. The chief purpose of this article is to consider and problematise shame from the perspective of the philosophy of education, and ask whether the concept of shame has a place in schools, whose important aims ought to include the development of democratic citizenship.     

Critical literacy: an approach to child rights education in Uganda and Canada

For children to know how to fully participate in and most effectively lead the world they will inherit, they must learn how to critically engage with it and be knowledgeable about foundational rights and instruments that support such engagement. Together, critical literacy, which encourages the examination and interrogation of the underlying assumptions of dominant narratives and ‘legitimate’ knowledge, and children's rights education, which involves children in learning how to express their ideas and fully participate in society (as appropriate to their age and ability), offer a powerful approach—theoretical and pedagogical—to engage children in active engagement of the world, especially with respect to the promotion of social justice. However, the layers of complexity and risks associated with deep consideration of challenging topics require expert guidance and compassionate role modelling from teachers of young children. Our paper considers the intersections between critical literacy and global child rights with reference to a study conducted with young school children in Canada and Uganda to discuss how teachers can support meaningful learning experiences in the classroom that can promote children's agency and social justice commitments.