运动员人力资本的产权界定

结合物权法、债权法理论,对贷款购房与运动员人力资本产权界定进行了研究。论述了贷款购房这一经济活动给予运动员人力资本产权界定的启示：产权界定不等同于财产所有权归属的界定,而是各方权利具体内容的界定;出资者在不拥有财产所有权的情况下,同样可以取得收益。运动员人力资本产权界定的原则不应是“谁投资、谁所有”,而应是“谁投资,谁受益”;区分财产所有权与债权,是实现运动员商业活动中多方合作和产权界定的基础;建立契约机制,是实现运动员人力资本产权分配的一个重要途径。研究还提出了结合具体的体育事务、根据相关法律法规研究体育产权的建议。     

体育比赛电视转播权与知识产权划界初探

指出了我国“电视转播”常在“转播”和“直播”两种意义上使用的现象,然后介绍了国际上通行的“电视转播”的概念,由此得出“电视转播权”概念。根据这一概念,对体育比赛电视转播权的法律性质进行了阐述．认为体育比赛电视转播权部分属于普通的无形财产权,部分属于知识产权。     

我国竞技健美操科研内容现状的辩证分析

通过对13种体育核心期刊有关竞技健美操论文的统计、分析,运用文献资料法、数理统计法、比较分析法、系统逻辑分析法、专家访问法,对1995-2007年间我国竞技健美操研究论文的主要内容及其分布的辩证关系进行了分析,来了解目前我国竞技健美操科学研究的现状及存在的问题。     

在体育教学中个性培养分析研究

以中学生为研究对象,用教学理论阐述了实施新课程标准后中学体育教学中进行个性教育的理论和必要性。实践中进行了问卷调查,并用统计的方法对问卷进行分析并得出结论。既为其他教育界同行提供理论上的探索,同时也为中学体育的教育教学实践提供了有益的参考。     

中学体育教育：体育课中的技术传授与身体锻炼的关系

在中学体育教育改革中出现了只注重让学生活动,而忽视体育知识技能传授的现象,这种现象严重阻碍了学校体育的发展。在“健康第一”的指导思想下,如何处理好体育技术的传授与身体锻炼的关系,是当前中学体育课堂教育的重点。研究认为,“健康第一”是体育教学的出发点和落脚点;让学生掌握运动知识、技术技能是中学体育教学的重要任务;在中学体育教学中,要正确理解身体锻炼和掌握体育知识技能技术的关系,只有两个方面结合起来,才能真正做到“健康第一”,也能使学生较好地掌握一、二门体育技术,并能终身受益。     

海上交通事故中的人为因素分析

从管理心理学的角度,对造成海上交通事故的最主要因素——人为因素进行了全面分析,指出人为因素是一个综合因素,各因素之间又相互联系。在分析时,不能片面地强调某个方面或孤立地研究某个因素,而应进行综合考虑。     

构建和谐社会不容忽视的问题--对我国离婚妇女财产权益保障的思考

社会主义和谐社会应该建立在公平和正叉的基础之上．离婚妇女财产权益得不到充分保障,生活相对贫困,必然影响社会的安定、和谐．建立和完善离婚妇女财产权益保障制度,从法律层面有效防止离婚妇女生活贫困化,是从源头上解决或缓解社会不公平、不安定、不和谐,确保我国社会安全运行和健康发展的重要措施。     

“N1+的+N2”短语结构中“的”的隐现规律考察

从认知语法的距离象似性角度来看,"N1+的+N2"结构以领属关系居多,领属关系中,N1有的是对N2的限定,有的是N1的部分属性投射到N2。表示限定时,靠近原型领属,结构中的"的"一般会出现,表示属性投射时,接近边缘性领属,"的"一般不会出现。"的"隐现象似于概念距离。     

Universities and government‐sponsored contract research: an Australian case study

Based on interviews, this article provides a case study of the experiences of academic staff at one Australian regional university in undertaking contract research projects sponsored by government departments and agencies. Academics from a surprisingly diverse range of disciplines are attracted to government‐sponsored research for a variety of reasons but particularly important is the financial support provided for research projects and postgraduate research students. Projects vary in scale, amounts of funding involved and purposes, with research activities covering a wide range of different activities including collection and analysis of data, provision of documentation on good practice, design of implementation strategies, evaluations, organisational reviews and policy recommendations. Overall, respondents are highly positive about their experiences, despite problems such as delays in payment of funds, inappropriately restricted timelines, frequent changes in senior agency personnel, unrealistic expectations, and restrictions in the use of data and publication of results. While many academics from different disciplines provide policy recommendations and carry out evaluative studies, few are well informed about the extent to which their work is actually utilised.     

Inter‐firm Migration of Tacit Knowledge: Law and Policy1

Abstract

Much knowledge is diffused by the exchange of property rights in intangibles. But tacit knowledge, not being subject to property rights, is instead diffused by migration of knowledgeable individuals between firms. The law impacts significantly on this diffusion mechanism, in particular those rules that determine the use individuals may make of their tacit knowledge after migration to a different firm. The general principle underlying the relevant law is that individuals are free to migrate with all their tacit knowledge. Nonetheless there are some narrow exceptions to this principle. That these exceptions remain narrow and carefully policed by the courts is important because imposing too many restraints on use of tacit knowledge post‐term would have a negative impact on real innovation.