现代职业教育体系的多中心建设

在职业教育深度改革和投资主体多元化的环境下,多中心建设是一种多边互惠共赢的发展建设模式。然而各主体行动逻辑的迥异构成了阻碍现代职业教育体系建立、健全的桎梏和顽疾。因此,从建设主体、建设路线以及制度创新三个方面着手提出现代职业教育体系的多中心建设思路,将为推进现代职业教育体系的优化、强化、活化、实化、深化提供有益借鉴。     

论世界一流大学建设的中国道路——国家行动与大学自主办学的耦合

世界一流大学的建设道路,具有由大学运行与发展的共同逻辑和基本规律决定的共性,也具有由大学运行与发展的生活环境和影响因素决定的个性,呈现出以共性与个性辩证统一为基础的多样性。中国特色世界一流大学建设走中国道路,既有理论层面的可能性,又有现实层面的必要性,还有实践层面的现实性,即具有合目的性与合规律性的必然性。中国特色世界一流大学建设走中国道路,既离不开作为战略规划、制度供给、资源配置、考核评价、监督管理以及信息服务主体的国家的强力推动、顶层设计以及统筹谋划,也离不开作为基层行动主体的大学的自主探索、自觉行动以及自发建构,即要走国家行动与大学自主办学耦合之路。     

知是行的主意 行是知的功夫——王阳明知行合一原旨

知行合一如阴阳一体,是不分先后的。知行合一可以解决言行不一之二重道德问题。知行合一了才能致良知。     

浅议体育隐蔽课程

对隐蔽课程的研究表明,体育隐蔽课程具有隐蔽性、广泛性、持久性、易接受性、难预测性等特点,能弥补显性课程时空的不足,对学生的个性发展具有举足轻重的作用。     

田径跳跃项目专项动作协调能力研究

通过对田径跳跃项目专项动作特征的研究,对田径跳跃项目专项动作协调能力进行了探索,认为田径跳跃项目的动作协调能力在运动技术上表现为：爆发性用力;跑跳结合;摆、蹬结合和空间动作的控制与定向能力四个方面,这将有助于我们对其专项运动协调能力水平做出科学的量度和判断,提高专项运动协调能力.     

民营企业投资行为分析——基于对133家温州民营企业的问卷调查

通过对133家温州民营企业在投资倾向、投资决策、投资环境评价等方面的调查与分析,得出的结论是:新投资项目投向温州以外的其他区域占了多数,投资其他区域的最重要原因是投资环境较好;多数企业认为影响投资决策的关键因素是投资成本低,而完善的行业协会、融资渠道畅通和能利用温州集体品牌对企业投资决策的影响较小;投资环境总体仍不尽人意,反映了土地及房产价格过高、技术与管理人员供应不足和政府部门的工作效率低等突出问题。     

青蒿素的热稳定行为及气相色谱分析

以气相色谱法研究了青蒿素的热稳定性、分解行为以及气相色谱分析方法.在色谱图上发现,青蒿素热分解有两个主产物,经推测可能为分解或重排产物.还发现前期流出的产物与青蒿素浓度有线性关系,据此可对青蒿素含量进行分析.     

高职院校行动德育模式研究

行动德育强调构建以大学生为中心的家庭、学校、用人单位(企业)三位一体的德育工作运行模式。这一模式重在大学生的德育实践,把学校、家庭与用人单位紧密联系在一起,相互配合、相互支持,共同推动大学生道德力的提高,进而培养出符合社会需求的高技能人才。     

Resistance in action learning: struggling with self-efficacy and the social Self – and what about the set advisor?

This account of practice explores the concept of resistance in action learning. Resistance is conceptualized as an attempt of self-protection that is manifested in action learners' struggles with their sense of self-efficacy and their social Self. These struggles are an inherent part of the action learning process and may elicit defensive undercurrents that constrain learning. I contribute to debates on criticality in action learning by recognizing the centrality of resistance as a source of learning for participants and set advisors. The intended contribution of this paper is to illuminate the importance of engaging with these limiting processes which can spark a powerful learning experience that reverberates long after the action learning programme has finished. Furthermore, I reflect on the opportunities this alternative view on resistance may provide for us as action learning facilitators and discuss how we may incorporate these reflections in our practice.     

Theme and variations: one middle school’s interpretation of mandated action research

In the current climate of accountability, action research is one way for teachers to evaluate instructional changes designed to improve assessment results. It may become increasingly common for administrators to mandate teacher involvement in action research, yet few studies have been conducted in such settings. This article focuses on one middle school where the principal mandated action research for all teachers. Projects were carried out within academic departments, and department chairs were given latitude in how to organize and implement projects. This study explores project implementation and teacher perceptions of the action research. Interviews were used as an appropriate tool to explore teacher perceptions, with document analysis providing triangulation. Results from interviews of administrators, department chairs, and department members suggest an overall positive attitude toward action research, as well as variation in how action research projects were carried out. Differences occurred across several dimensions of action research, including context, motivation/ purpose, definition of action research, and organization of projects. Variations appeared to be influenced by each department chair’s experience with action research and approach to departmental work, and each department’s history of working together on instructional improvement efforts. This study suggests that administrators who mandate teacher participation in action research projects need to think about both the positive (providing teacher ownership and interest within the mandated context) and problematic (possibly leading to variation in the instructional impact of projects) aspects of project variation.