艺术人类学视角与"美的规律"研究

建国以后国内美学界围绕《1844年经济学哲学手稿》展开持久而热烈的讨论,但多是从《手稿》的文本语境出发并坚持概念优先,在两个“尺度”、“规律”等命题上纠缠不休,遂使讨论走入迷境。在现有学术背景下,很有必要从艺术人类学视角出发,重新考察“尺度”、“规律”等命题,从而为当代中国美学建设及当下审美活动的评判提供思想素材。     

浅谈国民经济动员机制的重塑与经济动员制度的创新

国民经济要适应战争需要，必须依靠经济动员机制来实现，经济动员制度是经济机制存在和发生作用的基础。在新时期，经济动员内外环境发生的深刻变化客观上要求我们重塑经济动员机制，实现经济动员制度创新。     

民刑交错中精神损害赔偿的规则构造

民法典侵权责任编三次审议稿第960条规定了精神损害赔偿制度,同时《民法总则》第187条为刑事责任与民事责任竞合时的处理确立了"互不影响"原则。然而,民刑交错中的精神损害与普通民事侵权造成的精神损害在事实基础、法律功能和法律后果上存在诸多差异,民事领域的相关规定不能直接适用于民刑交错领域,因此民刑交错中精神损害赔偿制度的细节问题,尤其是主体、受保护权益、行为、严重性等问题值得探究。     

兰山书院之始末

兰山书院设于甘肃省会兰州。本文介绍了该书院从1735—1906一百七十年的历史,包括屋宇、教官、藏书、学规、生员等情况。对吴镇、张美如、张澍、张国常等院长的贡献,予以肯定。     

浅谈音乐表演中的联想

音乐表演属于创造性的音乐实践活动，为了更为准确的表达作品情感，音乐表演者在表演时要根据作品内涵充分展开联想，并通过各种途径丰富自己的联想。     

创造、创新和逻辑

创造和创新必须遵守逻辑规律。通常,人们思考问题都是从真前提进而得到真结论,在创造和创新活动中,一般都要经过由假前提寻求真结论的思维过程。     

对2004年FIBA篮球规则修改部分的分析与研究

为了使篮球比赛更加流畅,国际篮联又一次修改了比赛规则,新修改的篮球竞赛规则已于2004年9月1日起执行。本文就修改后的篮球竞赛规则有哪些新的特点和变化进行分析与研究,将有利于运动员、教练员、裁判员理解规则和执行规则,有助于篮球运动在中国的推广和发展。     

国际图联未成年人服务行业协调机制研究

国际图联是图书馆行业规模最大的专业性组织,对未成年人服务发展有着重要影响。本文主要采用案例研究法,从行业协调组织建设、行业制度性文件研制、服务项目建设以及对外合作交流等方面,梳理国际图联在未成年人服务主题领域下的行业协调工作体系,以期为我国未成年人公共文化服务行业协会的建设提供借鉴。     

应用型本科学生从事公益活动的意义研究

从应用型本科学生群体自身的特殊性、培养目标的定位来看,从事公益活动有助于学生规则意识的培养、综合能力的提升和良好思想道德、心理素质的培养,有助于应用型本科院校人才培养目标的实现。     

Development and Implementation of the Inaugural Anatomy Education Research Institute (AERI 2017)

Education research is increasingly being recognized as a legitimate route for faculty development in universities. However, many anatomy faculty lack the appropriate training and access to experienced mentors who can help them develop their own education research projects. Inspired by the American Physiological Society’s Institute for Teaching and Learning, the coauthors proposed and developed the inaugural Anatomy Education Research Institute (AERI 2017). Funded by an American Association of Anatomists Innovations grant, the five-day institute was held in Bloomington, Indiana in July 2017. The coauthors spent two years preparing the conference schedule, inviting speakers who could discuss education research topics and mentor applicants, reviewing applications, developing assessment instruments for the institute, and hosting the institute. A total of 62 registered participants (applicants and invited speakers) attended AERI 2017. Through a series of presentations and workshops, participants were introduced to many aspects of education research and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, including developing rigorous education research questions, determining appropriate methods to assess these questions, and searching the education research literature. Each day also included regular time devoted to work on their own education research project with help from more experienced mentors. Throughout the conference, participants were encouraged to post information on Twitter, using the hashtag #AERI2017. Participants had strong positive impressions of the conference and strongly requested future AERI conferences be held. Follow-up analyses will assess the institute in alignment with Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation Model, though preliminary evaluation indicates AERI 2017 met the original aims of the proposal.