一种基于海明码的FLASH文件系统的校验编码方法

FLASH存储器容易出现单个数据位错的常见问题,本文提出了基于海明码的二次校验编码方法。相比以往的扩展海明编码方法,该方法提高了编/解码的效率和纠错能力,有利于提高FLASH存储器的数据安全性并延长了FLASH存储的使用寿命。     

比较法视野下的自助行为制度研究

自助行为作为民事权利私力救济的方式之一。为近现代各回民法所确认,其功能在于弥补公力救济之不足。文章通过时两个固家即中回和日本典型素例的分析。透视了自助行为的构成要件．然后从比较法的角度分析自助行为与使权行为。最后将民法革素中的自助行为与大陆法系圈謇的法兵如《德国民法典》、《泰国民法典》中的自助行为进行了比较法分析,并涉及了大陆法系和英芙法系圈謇自助行为的比较。     

某品牌KFR-120W／08MD空调显示障代码“E4”检修一例

某品牌一台KFR-120W／08MD空调机,制冷运行中显示故障代码“E4”,不能正常制冷．根据故障现象和电路布线情况,经过分析、测量、判断、换件、试机,查出了故障原因予以排除．     

外语教师课堂讲解的语义发展探究:跨学科视角

外语课堂话语研究重视互动,对教师讲解关注不够,而教师讲解是学生语言输入的重要来源。本文结合系统功能语言学和合法化语码理论,从跨学科视角探究教师讲解语义发展。首先,在系统功能语言学框架内,基于语法层,揭示教师讲解所呈现的语义模式类型。然后,从合法化语码理论语义引力概念出发,描述语义模式在时间轴上的展开方式。最后,结合相关研究成果,讨论教师讲解语义发展对学生理解课文和构建各类知识可能带来的影响。     

《民法典》施行背景下足球伤害法律适用的新发展

在《中华人民共和国民法典》（以下简称《民法典》）施行背景下,足球伤害法律适用出现了新发展,对足球治理带来新挑战和新影响。就足球伤害的侵权归责原则而言,过去广为适用的公平责任原则不再适用,这将极大地增强社会足球和校园足球活动参加者、组织者的信心。《民法典》第1176条第1款明确规定了文体活动自甘风险规则的构成要件,对于足球运动参加者明确足球伤害法律适用规则提出了新要求。在三阶层的体育伤害侵权构造下,足球伤害的法律适用将从构成要件该当性、违法性和有责性三个层次递次考量。其中,对于作为违法阻却要件的自甘风险规则认定和作为有责性组成部分的重大过失认定将成为《民法典》时代足球伤害法律适用的核心议题。     

Mapping the field of Higher Education Research using PhD examination reports

The PhD is the highest formal qualification and signifies a scholar’s rite of passage as a legitimate contributor of new knowledge in a field. Examiner reports make claims about what is legitimate in a thesis and what is not and thus articulate the organising principles through which participation in a field is measured. The authors analysed 39 examiners’ reports on 13 PhDs produced over a five-year period by scholars from the Higher Education Research doctoral studies programme at Rhodes University in South Africa. Drawing on aspects of Karl Maton’s Legitimation Code Theory (LCT), this study uses the dimensions of LCT:Specialisation and LCT:Semantics to explore what kinds of knowledge, skills and procedures and what kinds of knowers are validated in the field of Higher Education Research through the examination process. The study found that despite concerns in the literature about the a-theoretical nature of the Higher Education Studies field, examiners valued high-level theoretical and meta-theoretical engagement as well as methodological rigour. In addition, examiners prized the ability to demonstrate a strong ideological position, to use a clear doctoral voice, and to recognise the axiological drive of the field. The analysis showed that examiners were interested in strong contextualisation of the problem-spaces in higher education in South Africa but also commented positively on candidates’ ability to move from troubling an issue within its context to being able to abstract findings so as to contribute to the field as a whole.     

Exploring the nature of disciplinary teaching and learning using Legitimation Code Theory Semantics

Teaching and learning is a growing field of research and practice globally, and increasing investments are being made in developing academics as teachers. An inability to adequately account for disciplinary knowledge can lead to academic development inputs that are unable to fully address the needs of students, educators, or disciplines themselves. Semantics, from Legitimation Code Theory (LCT), provides insight not just into the hows of pedagogy but also the whats and whys, particularly the ways in which knowledge needs to be connected up in meaning-making. This paper argues for the use of semantic profiles to open up conversations with educators about teaching, learning, and the nature of knowledge in their disciplines. It raises important questions about the practical uses of LCT tools in higher education and shares initial ideas, informed by lecturer feedback in one case study, of how these tools can be used in academic staff development.     

Serving two masters: how vocational educators experience marketisation reforms

Contemporary education reforms that draw ideas from the political and economic fields are said to be altering the nature of vocational education. While there are substantial policy studies on the effects of marketisation reforms, fewer analyse the perspectives of vocational educators on such reforms. How vocational educators negotiate the potential clash of values when marketisation reforms are enacted within the sector remains relatively unexplored. This paper aims to incorporate these perspectives in order to explore and help explain the responses of vocational educators to such changes. To do so the paper draws on concepts from Legitimation Code Theory, a sociological framework for analysing practices and beliefs. Specifically, it enacts ‘autonomy codes’, which reveal how external forces impact upon the internal practices of a social field. These concepts are used to analyse the beliefs and perceptions of a group of vocational educators in Australia who are undergoing marketisation reforms. The analysis suggests that many educators are experiencing a growing ‘code clash’ between the goals they attribute to reforms and their own beliefs about public education and the expectations of their students, one which problematises their capacity to reconcile these sets of values and colours their views of changes in the sector.     

The Structure of Federal Policy

Abstract

CSWE mandates the study of social welfare policy, its history, and its evaluation; thus, assignments that require students to select policy for study are common. Educators provide frameworks for analysis but may not address the prerequisite step of locating policy for study, so students flounder in government documents without the tools to navigate the organizational and retrieval structures. This article provides basic tools for locating federal law and for deciphering the United States Code (USC), which topically organizes and houses all federal legislation. It uses the familiar examples of social security, welfare reform, and charitable choice. Familiarizing social workers with the USC provides useful knowledge for various policy projects and a conceptual framework for understanding federal policy, past, and present.     

论印度刑事司法体系下的强奸罪及被害人权利

尽管印度于1983年通过了刑法修疋案,但其法律体系仍不能有效规制强奸罪,也许有必要从被害人角度唤醒他们自身对权利的认知,同时提高司法介入的效率。印度宪法第21条规定,妇女和男人平等享有生存权和自由权,因此当前的问题不是被害人是否有保持身体完整的权利,而是能否采取紧急措施根除犯罪,让妇女在当前和未来很长一段时间内处于安全。由于其他因素的存在,致使可能单纯通过颁布新的法令或扩大法律执行机构等方式不能遏制犯罪,所以立法目的和法院办案思维可作适当调整,考虑将妇女权益尤其强奸罪被害人权利作为明确的保护范畴。既然该种犯罪属于社会一法律交叉问题,那幺时于政府、妇女组织及法律制度来说。当务之急是给予妇女及时的救济。