究竟谁之过 值得反思

抄作业、考试作弊现象盛行,隐藏在这些现象背后的原因是什么？我们应该做些什么来减少或杜绝次类现象的发生？我们教育工作者是否都应该反思一下。产生这些现象的原因有：社会原因——诚信的缺失;家庭原因——父母认识的误区;学校原因——评价的失误。     

关于考试作弊适用开除学籍的法律思考

在教育事业高速发展的今天,学校对于考试作弊的惩罚力度越来越大,然而考试作弊的现象屡禁不止,针对这一问题,很多学校适用了＂开除学籍＂这一做法。近年来,各地陆续出现了因为考试作弊被开除学籍而引发的诉讼,学生的受教育权再次被搬上历史舞台。此类的诉讼引起了社会各界的广泛关注及法律界的热烈讨论：学校是否有开除学籍的资格？学校针对考试作弊适用开除学籍这一做法是否合理合法？由考试作弊适用开除学籍引起的诉讼法院应不应该受理？我国教育方面的立法是否完善？现阶段我们该如何解决这一棘手的问题？等等。这些都是值得我们深思的问题。本文将从学校针对考试作弊适用开除学籍这一做法切入,解读学校和学生之间的法律冲突与矛盾,进一步呼吁教育立法的完善。     

对大学生考试作弊的思考

作弊是大学生考试中的一种常见现象，它不仅毒害了学生的心灵，还影响到学生心理的健康状况，更不利于其整体的发展与成长。结合学生的实际，分析考试作弊的原因及造成的后果。提出从学生自身、考试管理、教师试题角度进行防治考试作弊的一些措施。     

浅谈校园网ARP欺骗与防范

在高校校园网中,ARP欺骗攻击经常发生,造成用户网络不稳定或网络中断。介绍ARP协议,分析ARP协议的缺陷和ARP欺骗的实现过程,结合实际工作提出几种可行的解决欺骗攻击的实用方法,有利于防范并解决ARP欺骗。     

清朝科举考试舞弊要案的计量历史学分析

科举对中国古代社会发展曾产生过积极的影响。但是在清朝这个科举制度最完备的时期,科举考试舞弊却尤为盛行,出现多次大型要案,且手段多样,频次增加。通过对清朝历代科举考试舞弊要案的史实考察,运用计量历史学的研究方法,对清朝科举考试舞弊的案发时间、地域、考试类型、手段、规模、处罚形式等进行较详细的统计分析。     

How Students Report Dishonest Behavior in School: Self-Assessment and Anchoring Vignettes

The authors have studied heterogeneity in reporting behavior and its impact on the analysis of self-reports about students’ dishonest behavior in schools. Two hundred sixty-five randomly chosen, seventh-grade students (typically 12 years old) from lower secondary schools in Prague 6, a district in the capital of the Czech Republic, participated in this survey. The results of the self-reports, adjusted for heterogeneity, are highly related to students’ levels of academic achievement and their parents’ education and partly related to their gender, while unadjusted self-reports are only slightly related to the level of parents’ education. The authors also show differences in the reporting behavior across diverse subdomains of school behavior and suggest using anchoring vignettes closely related to the domain described in the self-reports.     

大学生考试作弊问题及其对策

随着现代技术手段的不断进步。大学生考试作弊的表现形式亦呈现多样化趋势。大学生对考试作弊的态度、作弊的原因亦出现新的变化。要通过加强思想品德教育、营造良好的校风学风、改革创新考试模式、加强考试纪律和尽早实施《考试法》解决大学生考试作弊问题。     

考试舞弊防治中的博弈分析

本文运用“囚徒困境”博弈模型，建立了学生考试舞弊的博弈模型和师生考试舞弊博弈模型，指出了学生考试舞弊的本质原因，并提出了防治考试舞弊的条件和对策。     

Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship

This paper reports on findings from a large Australian research project that explored the relationship between contract cheating and assessment design. Using survey responses from 14,086 students and 1147 educators at eight universities, a multivariate analysis examined the influence of a range of factors on the likelihood that different assessment types would prompt considerations of contract cheating in students. Perceptions of likelihood were highest among students who speak a language other than English at home. Perceptions of likelihood were also higher among students who reported there to be lots of opportunities to cheat, and amongst students who were dissatisfied with the teaching and learning environment. Perceptions of likelihood for certain assessment types were also higher in commerce and engineering than in any other discipline. Overall, four assessment types were perceived by students to be the least likely to be outsourced, however these are also the least likely to be set by educators. The analysis indicates that educators are more likely to use these assessment tasks when they report positively on organisational support for teaching and learning.     

计算机实验考试的防弊系统

针对计算机实验考试时考生可能出现的各种违规行为,逐一给出具体的应对策略,并根据防作弊需求设计了面向实验考试的基于C/S架构的考试系统,最后论述了关键模块的实现.实际应用结果表明,该系统能有效地限制考生的违规操作,保证了考试的公平性.