学术不端行为的危害及其防范措施

学术不端行为败坏了学术道德、污染了学术空气,使学术尊严遭到践踏。防范学术不端行为必须从加强学术道德建设入手,强化科研人员的自律意识,完善学术评价制度并建立对学术不端行为的惩处机制。同时,学术期刊应严格把关,加大审稿力度,以技术手段防范学术不端行为。通过自律与他律,逐步形成诚实科研、严谨治学的良好氛围,以维护学术尊严。     

关于高校大学生作弊的几点思考

高校学生作弊不仅是一种欺骗行为，而且是一种严重的失范和失信行为，它破坏了高校正常的教学秩序，影响了高校的声誉，玷污了高校这一神圣殿堂，因此，对作弊应严加管教，纠正其不良行为，杜绝作弊行为。     

从清代"枪手"现象看现代"枪手"责任的完善

考试大潮涌动,"枪手"现象屡禁不止。如何以古鉴今,从法律制度建设、处罚手段去完善现有"枪手"的责任,维护公平的竞争机制,成为目前急需解决的问题。     

On the cause of university students＇ cheating phenomenon from the perspective of Albert Bandura＇s reciprocal determinism

In recent years, ＂cheating＂ becomes a prevalent social phenomenon among the university students, which result in a bad influence to the quality of higher education, to the healthy growth of the university students, and to the social morale. To solve this problem, the key is to scoop out the root reason and get rid of it thoroughly. The emergence of cheating comes from various reasons, this paper is supposed to make an objective, systematic and dialectic analysis basing on Albert Bandura＇s reciprocal determinism.     

Personality predictors of scholastic cheating in a Chinese sample

Previous research on Western college samples has identified a number of personality traits associated with scholastic cheating. Based on these findings, we suggest a model integrating personality predictors of cheating. However, it remains unclear whether the proposed model can be generalised to the Chinese culture, which has different norms and societal values. We filled this gap by estimating the associations between scholastic cheating and key personality constructs (i.e. the Big Five and the Dark Triad) in a sample of Chinese university students (N?=?634). Our results indicated that older and male students were more likely to engage in scholastic cheating than other students. After controlling for the constructs’ overlap, only extraversion and psychopathy remained significant correlates. We discuss the implications of our findings for both research and practice.     

浅议考试作弊

考试作为一种社会活动,隐含了各种功利目的.一些人为此而在考试过程中作弊.同时,由于考生对作弊乐此不疲,作弊开始变成商业化运作.如今,作弊方式花样繁多,作弊技术也日趋先进.鉴于此,考试主管部门采取了相应的反作弊措施.尽管如此,反作弊依然任重而道远.如何强化考试管理,提高考务人员素质是新形势下考试反作弊工作亟待解决的问题.     

高等教育自学考试作弊现象成因分析及对策探讨

高等教育自学考试是国家正规的学历证书考试，考试环节组织的好坏直接影响着考生的质量和社会信誉，然而在自学考试过程中，经常有各种各样的作弊现象发生。为此本通过对各类作弊现象的分析，找出作弊现象的影响因素，通过影响因素找出了作弊现象的应对策略，希望对成人自考工作以帮助。     

Detecting probable cheating during online assessments based on time delay and head pose

This study investigated the ability of test takers’ behaviors during online assessments to detect probable cheating incidents. Specifically, this study focused on the role of time delay and head pose for detection of cheating incidences in a lab-based online testing session. The analysis of a test taker’s behavior indicated that not only time delay but also the variation of a student’s head pose relative to computer screen had significant statistical relation to cheating behaviors. Additionally, time delay and head-pose variation relative to a computer screen were predictors in a logit model of cheating prediction with an average accuracy of 75.6%. The current algorithm could automatically flag suspicious student behavior for proctors in large-scale online courses during remotely administered exams.     

Faculty and Academic Integrity: The Influence of Current Honor Codes and Past Honor Code Experiences

This survey of faculty at honor code and non-honor code institutions investigated the influence of honor codes on faculty attitudes and behaviors. As hypothesized, we found that honor code faculty have more positive attitudes toward their schools' academic integrity policies and are more willing to allow the system to take care of monitoring and disciplinary activities. Faculty in noncode institutions have less positive attitudes and are more likely to take personal actions designed to both catch and deal with cheaters. We also investigated the potential influence of a student honor code experience on faculty attitudes. We found that, in noncode environments, faculty who had an honor code experience as a student were more likely to believe that students should be held responsible for peer monitoring and to say that they deal personally with cheating. Implications for higher education institutions are discussed.     

高等学校学生管理的法律思考——解读《普通高等学校学生管理规定》的修改

面对高校学生管理的诸多问题。教育部对《普通高等学校学生管理规定》进行了重大修改。当前的首要任务是认真学习和正确理解新《规定》，清理和修改各校自己的规定。开除、退学须以教育部的规定为限，在这方面学校没有“自主权”；考试作弊是不耻于学生本分的行为．对严重作弊行为可以开除学籍，学校应当严格学业要求和考风考纪，对学业不合格者实行淘汰制；对大学生婚恋实行人性化政策，但是应当加强管理。大龄学生要求结婚应当允许，而对一般学生则应劝阻，对大学生同居应当否定和制止。