关于高校大学生作弊的几点思考

高校学生作弊不仅是一种欺骗行为，而且是一种严重的失范和失信行为，它破坏了高校正常的教学秩序，影响了高校的声誉，玷污了高校这一神圣殿堂，因此，对作弊应严加管教，纠正其不良行为，杜绝作弊行为。     

高等学校学生管理的法律思考——解读《普通高等学校学生管理规定》的修改

面对高校学生管理的诸多问题。教育部对《普通高等学校学生管理规定》进行了重大修改。当前的首要任务是认真学习和正确理解新《规定》，清理和修改各校自己的规定。开除、退学须以教育部的规定为限，在这方面学校没有“自主权”；考试作弊是不耻于学生本分的行为．对严重作弊行为可以开除学籍，学校应当严格学业要求和考风考纪，对学业不合格者实行淘汰制；对大学生婚恋实行人性化政策，但是应当加强管理。大龄学生要求结婚应当允许，而对一般学生则应劝阻，对大学生同居应当否定和制止。     

从清代"枪手"现象看现代"枪手"责任的完善

考试大潮涌动,"枪手"现象屡禁不止。如何以古鉴今,从法律制度建设、处罚手段去完善现有"枪手"的责任,维护公平的竞争机制,成为目前急需解决的问题。     

从大学生考试作弊谈高校教学管理

大学生考试作弊是高等学校教学管理中经常面临的问题之一，其作弊原因主要有社会环境的因素，自身心理方面的因素和学校管理上的缺陷等。高校要改善这种状况，必须加强教学管理，端正学生的学习态度，激发学生的学习热情，提高教学质量。     

Faculty and Academic Integrity: The Influence of Current Honor Codes and Past Honor Code Experiences

This survey of faculty at honor code and non-honor code institutions investigated the influence of honor codes on faculty attitudes and behaviors. As hypothesized, we found that honor code faculty have more positive attitudes toward their schools' academic integrity policies and are more willing to allow the system to take care of monitoring and disciplinary activities. Faculty in noncode institutions have less positive attitudes and are more likely to take personal actions designed to both catch and deal with cheaters. We also investigated the potential influence of a student honor code experience on faculty attitudes. We found that, in noncode environments, faculty who had an honor code experience as a student were more likely to believe that students should be held responsible for peer monitoring and to say that they deal personally with cheating. Implications for higher education institutions are discussed.     

治理考试作弊应当纳入法律规范

近些年来,几乎每次国家级考试都会爆出作弊的丑闻,且愈演愈烈,考试环境十分严峻。考试作弊不仅严重损害国家考试制度的公平公正和权威性,而且破坏了社会的诚信理念,加剧了整个社会的信用危机。“情节严重”的考试作弊行为已经明显地涉嫌犯罪,应当依法制裁。必须加强考试法制建设,从法律制度上净化各类考试作弊赖以生存的土壤,并对现行考试选拔制度进行更加深入的改革和完善,特别是要尽快制定统一的《国家考试法》。通过法律治理手段有效预防和遏制考试作弊,依法规范国家考试的秩序,促进国家考试的良性发展,真正实现依法治考。     

Contract cheating in Australian higher education: a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities

Abstract

This article reports on one aspect of a nationally funded research project on contract cheating in Australian higher education. The project explored students' and educators’ experiences of contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence it. This article reports the key findings from non-university higher education providers (NUHEPs). It compares survey responses from 961 students and 91 educators at four NUHEPs with previously reported findings from eight universities (14,086 students and 1,147 staff). NUHEP and university students report engaging in contract cheating in similar ways. However, while NUHEP educators spend more time teaching academic literacies and discussing contract cheating, NUHEP students are 12 times more likely than university students to report use of a professional academic writing service. Both NUHEP and university educators require systematic professional development regarding the relationship between the teaching and learning environment and students’ contract cheating behaviour. NUHEPs need to be cognisant of students’ vulnerability to commercial contract cheating services, and ensure they have access to timely academic and social support.     

成本收益分析视角下的高校学生考试作弊问题研究

组织各级各类考试是高校评价学生学习效果的重要手段之一,但学生的作弊行为却严重破坏了考试制度的公平性和有效性。以经济学的成本—收益分析法为工具,从考试中学生和监考人员两个角度出发,分析高校学生考试作弊的原因,并提出相应的对策,具有重要的现实指导意义。     

高等教育自学考试作弊现象成因分析及对策探讨

高等教育自学考试是国家正规的学历证书考试，考试环节组织的好坏直接影响着考生的质量和社会信誉，然而在自学考试过程中，经常有各种各样的作弊现象发生。为此本通过对各类作弊现象的分析，找出作弊现象的影响因素，通过影响因素找出了作弊现象的应对策略，希望对成人自考工作以帮助。     

Is plagiarism changing over time? A 10-year time-lag study with three points of measurement

Are more students cheating on assessment tasks in higher education? Despite ongoing media speculation concerning increased ‘copying and pasting’ and ghostwritten assignments produced by ‘paper mills’, few studies have charted historical trends in rates and types of plagiarism. Additionally, there has been little comment from researchers as to the best way to assess changes in plagiarism over time. In this paper, we discuss the relative strengths and weaknesses of research designs for assessing changes in plagiarism over time, namely cross-sectional, longitudinal, and time-lag. We also report the results of our own time-lag study of plagiarism. We assessed self-reported engagement in, awareness of, and attitudes towards plagiarism in three comparable groups of students at the same university on three occasions, each separated by five years (2004, 2009, and 2014). The data from our study paint an encouraging picture of increased understanding and reduced occurrence of several forms of plagiarism, with no upward trend in verbatim copying or ghostwriting. We suggest that technological and educational initiatives are counteracting the potential for increased plagiarism from online sources.