论对话教学过程中的言语伦理原则

在对话教学过程中,为了创设师生言语交流道德氛围,实现人的和谐自由全面发展的善性理想,必须设定对话教学的言语伦理原则。提出四条言语伦理基本原则,即仁爱原则、公正原则、合作原则和礼貌原则,希望对对话教学原则理论的探讨有所裨益。     

工学结合背景下校企文化渗透融合的研究

工学结合是高职教育人才培养模式改革的切入点,构建校企文化渗透融合的长效机制是工学结合具有持久性和生命力的重要保障。本文从三个方面阐述了校企文化渗透融合的意义,从五个方面探讨了构建校企文化渗透融合长效机制的途径。     

农村教育乡土逃离及归因分析——以前村小学近20年的变迁为例

农村教育的起点是乡土逃离,之后的变迁更加凸显了乡土逃离的趋势。在城市包围农村、工业统领农业时代,城市几乎占据了一切优势,农村在制度上被忽视,在经济上被边缘化,在文化上被荒漠化,整个农村都失去了得以发展其特色的根基,成为城市的复制品,乡土逃离的农村只能孕育出乡土逃离的农村教育。寄希望于新农村建设能够带来农村教育的变革。     

相伴相生：青岩历史流变与班氏土司

青岩兴起的600余年,其中最关键的两百多年（1572年-1824年）与班氏土司相伴相生.班麟贵对青岩城的修筑,奠定了青岩发展的物质基础;由土司衙门改建的青岩书院,使青岩文化发生了质的变革,青岩书院出来的赵以炯等名人,成为青岩“历史文化古镇”的重要标志.     

论学业评价伦理的内涵、生成原则及路径

学业评价伦理是学业评价的重要组成部分,对学业评价标准的制定,评价活动的实施以及学生的发展都具有积极的促进作用。鉴于当前学业评价中对伦理重视不够的情况,论文在界定了学业评价伦理内涵的基础上,探讨了学业评价伦理的生成原则及路径。     

Ethical issues in online educational research: protecting privacy,establishing authenticity in email interviewing

Educational researchers have a responsibility to ensure that in whatever research paradigm they work, the research that is conducted is done so within an ‘ethic of respect’ to those who participate. This implies a number of responsibilities on the part of the researcher that include ensuring trust, dignity, privacy, confidentiality and anonymity. When research uses the Internet as the medium of investigation, these ethical responsibilities become more complex for the educational researcher. This paper discusses such complexities by examining the ethical dilemmas of using the Internet as a site for qualitative research. It will draw on two educational studies that used email interviewing, and will specifically focus on two ethical challenges the researchers faced when using this method: protecting participants’ privacy and anonymity, and establishing authenticity in online environments, including the way in which ownership of online research conversations and identities are experienced and expressed. In discussing such dilemmas, the paper concludes by questioning whether these issues can be addressed in an effort to construct the unattainable but pursue the utopian: fully ethical educational research.     

Taking Political Autonomy Seriously: a reply to Ian Gregory

This paper raises some questions about academic authorial honesty under the headings of Plagiarism (including self‐plagiarism), Theft, and Collusion. Compared with the medical sciences, the social sciences in general and education specifically, lag behind in terms of critical attention being paid to the problem of plagiarism, the peer review process and academic authorial ethics. The ubiquity of the Internet, the ever intensifying demand to publish or perish, and maybe, a general shift in perceptions of what constitutes ‘bad’ plagiarism and collusion which challenge traditional notions of what constitutes authorial honesty, mean that the time may be ripe for a consideration by academic writers and journal editors of how they regard and deal with the whole area. This paper makes an early contribution to the discussion.     

Alternative ways of expressing and reading identity

This paper explores the use of an ‘anti-CV’ (anti-Curriculum Vitae), or identity portfolio, as a data collection instrument in research with young people. We analyse four visually based anti-CVs created by participants in a project on youth transitions, exploring their use of symbolism and space to show how these young people reworked public narratives in their crafting of identity at the child–adult border. We use Gillian Rose's framework from 2001 for the analysis of visual material to interpret the portfolios in terms of the context of their production, their content and the audience for their performance. We argue that the anti-CV offered a more participant-led research process than the standard interview, but at the same time led to methodological and ethical complexities: respectively, concerning the significance of the research team as audience for the anti-CVs, and the intrusion into participants’ lives that photographs in these portfolios offered.     

Oral history research ethics: should anonymity and confidentially issues be dealt with on their own merit?

ABSTRACT

A primary principle of ethical codes in research involving people is that of informed consent which ensures participants’ right to privacy, confidentiality and anonymity. A blanket application of the principle of anonymity to Oral History (OH) research could well be counterproductive to the purported aims of OH research. The research comprised a literature study. Four rationales for doing OH are discussed and positioned within the philosophical framework that informs the purpose of and methodological approach to the research. Examples are extracted to explain where the principle of anonymity could be at variance with the research aims. When OH research sets out to contribute to historical understanding, validate respondents’ lives, contribute to democracy and facilitate socio-political transformation, enforcing anonymity has the potential to denigrate the respondent and jeopardize research credibility. Researchers should question whether the unmitigated application of the principle of anonymity restricts them from achieving their mandate of affording respondents’ dignity, respect, autonomy and beneficence.     

Collaborative partnerships to increase resilience among AIDS orphans: Some unforeseen challenges and caveats

Abstract

Previous research has attested to the power of metaphor-rich stories to enable resilience during individual therapy, but this has not been researched in a group context. We aimed to ascertain if the reading of brief stories in a group setting, with no other therapeutic intervention, would prove to be a valuable, inexpensive and accessible protective resource for the empowerment of AIDS orphans. We followed a quasi-experimental design, incorporating pre and post-test double control groups and a mixed methods approach to data collection. However, some very interesting methodological, ethical and practical challenges surfaced during implementation concerning: the meeting of community expectations; the identification of appropriate participant groups; the administration and suitability of research instruments; ensuring continued attendance of participants; and dealing with the emotional needs of participants without endangering the validity of the results. This article reports on these challenges and makes suggestions around issues that need to be resolved if future research partnerships with community members who care for AIDS orphans are to yield useful and valid research results.