浅析超低音扬声器阵列的指向性控制

论述指向性超低音扬声器阵列的意义和实际应用价值,阐述三种常规超低音扬声器阵列的指向性基本原理,采用专用计算机软件进行模拟仿真,利用实际消声室实验对该基础理论以及计算机仿真结果进行验证及归纳总结;并针对侧墙对Front/Back阵列声辐射的影响进行探究,通过实验得出结论。     

论高校学生处分制度的完善

为了解决高校校方和学生之间因为不当处分而产生的纠纷,保护学生的合法权益,就要从法律的角度出发,在实体和程序两方面重构学生处分制度,以期达到公平正义,实现依法治教、依法治校的目标。     

论侵权补充责任

侵权补充责任作为一种新类型的侵权责任形态,它的含义包括以下两个要点:1.程序意义的补充,补充责任的顺序是第二位的;2.实体意义的补充,补充责任人承担的赔偿责任是第二顺序的责任.     

新时期高校学生党建工作探析

高校是培养人才的重要基地。积极培养和吸收符合条件的大学生入党,是高校各级党组织一项经常性的重要工作,也是加强基层党组织建设的一项重要内容。为了确保党员发展工作积极稳妥地进行,各级党组织必须在完善机制、严格程序、讲求实效等方面踏踏实实做好工作。     

简论我国死刑复核程序的改革

近年来中国司法领域内数起冤案的产生使得学界和舆论再次掀起了探讨司法改革的热潮,而死刑复核程序显然成为其中的焦点.中国死刑复核程序的价值、死刑核准权下放与收回等问题备受学界关注.死刑核准权的收回将拉开以死刑复核程序改革为切入点的新一轮司法改革的序幕.     

我国价格决策听证制度初探--以铁路价格决策听证会为例

自1998年《中华人民共和国价格法》实施以来，价格决策听证制度成为实施政府定价和政府指导价的程序规则。这是继行政处罚听证和立法听证之后，听证制度作为一项程序正义规则的进一步应用。本文以听证制度的理论渊源、行政听证制度的基本理论为基础，以《价格法》和《政府价格决策听证办法》等法条为依据，着重总结了我国价格决策听证制度的主要内容、原则和性质；以我国《价格法》颁布后第一例全国性质的价格决策听证会——2002年铁路春运调价听证会为例，分析我国价格听证决策制度在执行过程中发现的一些问题和不足；通过对《政府价格决策听证暂行办法》和取代《暂行办法》的《政府价格决策听证办法》的比较，展望了我国价格听证制度的前景。     

试论我国宪政程序的完善

我国宪政程序在立宪程序、行宪程序和护宪程序中都还存在着很多不足,其主要原因在于程序工具主义观念、程序主体不独立和严格规则主义的影响.对此,笔者根据正当程序的观念和宪政主义的要求,分别对三大宪政程序提出了完善措施,以期早日实现法治国家的战略目标.     

An analysis of the value of multiple mentors in formalised elite coach mentoring programmes

Background: Within the context of sports coaching and coach education, formalised mentoring relationships are often depicted as a mentor–mentee dyad. Thus, mentoring within sports coaching is typically conceptualised as a one-dimensional relationship, where the mentor is seen as the powerful member of the dyad, with greater age and/or experience [Colley, H. (2003). Mentoring for Social Inclusion. London: Routledge].

Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the concept of a multiple mentor system in an attempt to advance our theoretical and empirical understanding of sports coach mentoring. In doing so, this paper builds upon the suggestion of Jones, Harris, and Miles [(2009). “Mentoring in Sports Coaching: A Review of the Literature.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 14 (3): 267–284] who highlight the importance of generating empirical research to explore current mentoring approaches in sport, which in turn can inform meaningful formal coach education enhancement. The significance of this work therefore lies in opening up both a practical and a theoretical space for dialogue within sports coach education in order to challenge the traditional dyadic conceptualisation of mentoring and move towards an understanding of ‘mentoring in practice’.

Method: Drawing upon Kram’s [(1985). Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organisational Life. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman] foundational mentoring theory to underpin a multiple mentoring support system, 15 elite coach mentors across a range of sports were interviewed in an attempt to explore their mentoring experiences. Subsequently, an inductive thematic analysis endeavoured to further investigate the realities and practicalities of employing a multiple mentoring system in the context of elite coach development.

Results: The participants advocated support for the utilisation of a multiple mentor system to address some of the inherent problems and complexities within elite sports coaching mentoring. Specifically, the results suggested that mentees sourced different mentors for specific knowledge acquisition, skills and attributes. For example, within a multiple mentor approach, mentors recommended that mentees use a variety of mentors, including cross-sports and non-sport mentors.

Conclusion: Tentative recommendations for the future employment of a multiple mentoring framework were considered, with particular reference to cross-sports or non-sport mentoring experiences.     

社会资本视域下协商型社会组织的构建

“探索开展社会组织协商”的提出,使得如何构建协商型社会组织成为理论界关注的热点问题。对各地区社会组织数量与政府信息公开状况的相关性分析表明,社会组织的发育程度与协商开展密切相关;对2014年“全国性行业协会商会评估专题数据”的分析发现,社会组织社会资本发育不足是开展社会组织协商的瓶颈。应以服务绩效增强社会组织的网络覆盖,以外部制度促进社会组织内部规范的民主化,以制度创新推动社会组织公信力的提升,培育社会组织适合于协商民主的社会资本,推进协商型社会组织的建设,进而促进社会组织协商的全面开展。     

论行政立法程序中公众参与的问题与对策

民主参与机制是行政立法程序的核心和精髓.行政立法程序中公众参与具有促进立法民主、实现人民主权、提高立法质量、法的实施以及适应WTO要求的重要价值;当前我国行政立法程序中存在着法律制度不完善、行政机关漠视公民参与权、参与程序的可操作性不够、公民参与意识比较淡漠等问题;对此,必须加强立法、完善配套制度、转变行政机关观念、提高公民意识以及建立责任追究制,从而完善我国行政立法公众参与制度.