关于个性化教学模式的探索

本文主要介绍了关于高等职业教育个性化教学模式的探索与研究以及一些实践经验,重点从三个方面总结了我们在实际的教学科研实践中的一些经验,并结合一些具体的措施和事例详细论述了个性化教学在教学实践中的重要性和必要性。     

教法千种 阅读为先

注重指导学生掌握正确阅读方法,使他们广泛、快捷地获得知识,是语文教师责无旁贷的。最佳阅读方法是:通揽全篇,寻觅精华的泛读与咬文嚼字、钻透精髓的精读相结合。     

浅谈高职院校《应用写作》教学中学生的主动发现和发展

高职院校《应用写作》教学的主动发现、主动发展,旨在确立以学生发展为本,培养学生的实践能力,变学生的被动发展为主动发展,让学生在实践探索中形成自我感悟,获取新知识。     

程序教学法在普通高校体育课的应用与研究

在普通高校体育课中的健美操课、排球课、太极拳课教学中进行了“程序教学法”的教学实验，结果表明：实验组成绩优于对照组而且有显著差异；实验组成绩趋于高分一端，从而对“学生成绩呈正态分布”的传统观点提出了挑战。应用程序教学法，能使不同层次的学生根据自己的实际情况学习适应自己水平的教材，能够充分发挥教师的指导作用与学生主体作用。有利于形成新的学生观和教学观。     

表象训练法在背越式跳高教学中的应用

将表象训练的原理运用于背越式跳高技术的教学过程中,为改进传统的教学方法,提高教学质量进行了有益的探讨和尝试.     

从短跑支撑技术的发展看体育专业短跑教学

随着短跑技术的发展，“屈蹬”技术的出现，与体育专业传统的充分后蹬教学理论与方法产生了较大的矛盾。为运用现代信息技术和运动学的方法，对世界顶级短跑运动员和体育教育专业学生的支撑技术进行了比较研究，得出了体育专业学生后蹬技术教学应采取“多元化”方法的结论。     

试论篮球教学中如何培养学生的学习兴趣

文章重点论述了篮球教学中培养和激发学生学习兴趣的重要性,并介绍了如何培养兴趣的方法手段,可供参考.     

试论培育形体与形体课教学的关系

通过采用文献法、问卷调查法、数理统计法 ,以浙江省台州师专 1997级、1998级选修形体课的 82名女大学生为研究对象 ,对 2 6名没有体操、舞蹈基础和 6名已有一定体操、舞蹈基础的女大学生进行问卷调查 ;其目的是根据女大学生的生理、心理特点 ,对造成学生情绪变化的原因进行分析 ,提出了在形体的培育过程中 ,不仅利用动作编创的合理性、优美性 ,培养学生高雅的气质和风度 ,发展学生个性 ,陶冶美的情操 ,使外表更加和谐完善。而且 ,阐明了在形体课教学中 ,运用绘制简图或图解资料的强化性教学为学生奠定终身体育的基础 ;使形体课真正体现出育体、育心的效应     

浅谈体育教学中的语言艺术

体育教学语言是教师向学生传授知识的载体,交流情感的方式及培养人才的工具,亦是影响教学效果的重要因素之一.通过对体育教学语言的分类、特点及其运用方法的论述,着重阐明了体育教学语言指令性、调节性和感染性特点;语言修养及教育性、准确性和生动性等要求.     

A first introduction to archival science

This first introduction, written for educational purposes, is meant to be a concise basic text in which the core concepts of archival science are coherently defined and explained, in a non-polemical way and departing from a de-institutionalised point of view. It is not intended to support or reject any single theory, but to provide an overview. It should be read as a synthesis of a variety of shared ideas and views, not as a manifesto of a new approach to archival science. If there is anything new to it, it might be located in the coherent and integrated presentation. In this primer of archival science annotation has been avoided. The first of several versions of this First Introduction was written in August 1995. It was meant to meet the need of the Netherlands Archiefschool for a basic text on archival science which could support its different programs for archival education and training. After ample discussion with the archival science teachers of the Archiefschool, it was introduced in the 1995/1996 courses. From then on, it has been used in almost all courses and classes on archival science on the undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate levels and in several training and retraining programs of the Archiefschool. The design of the first version has been maintained in all subsequent versions, including this last one. Still, the text has frequently been adapted as a result of discussions with students and colleagues, in and outside the school. This first English version can almost be deemed as a collective product. Of the numerous colleagues who were engaged in this discussion and contributed to the text, special mention has to be made of Peter Horsman, Hans Scheurkogel, Hans Hofman, Eric Ketelaar, Herman Coppens and Kent Hayworth, who commented the English version. For the final text and all imperfections that may still cling to it I am, of course, responsible. An earlier version in Dutch has been published as: Theo thomassen, “Een korte introductie in de archivistiek”, in: P.J. Horsman, F.C.J. Ketelaar en T.H.P.M. Thomassen (red.),Naar een nieuw paradigma in de archivistiek ('s-Gravenhage, 1999), pp. 11–20.