论知识分享

应当从综合的角度来理解知识分享的含义。知识分享是知识共享的一个重要条件，问题解决型知识分享是知识分享的主流形式，图书馆的发展史是一部知识分享的演进史，制度安排和信息技术是知识分享不断发展的有力保证，互联网是迄今为止人类所创造的最重要的知识分享工具(系统)，知识分享是共时分享和历时分享的有机统一。     

县(市)图书馆新馆建设中的几个问题

论文结合仪征图书馆新馆建设的实践，论述了县(市)图书馆在新馆建设中应该严把选址关，注重建筑特色与建筑风格，强调开放性和多功能性。     

守望精神建构 图书馆责任重大

本文简要分析了当今中国精神建构和出版阅读的现状后，探讨了图书馆为实现其守望国民精神家园的重要职责所实施的四项对策。参考文献4。     

Setting the Students’ Bearings and Balance in Appraisal

The author, a professor at the University of Toronto, touches briefly on the extensive and rich archival literature that supports the teaching of macroappraisal, but notes that this is not the only educational material she offers her students when teaching appraisal theory. She discusses the usefulness to archivists of literature from the fields of ethnography, organizational knowing, records in history, personal documentary behaviour, memory, and communications, noting that the use of texts from these fields can encourage students to reflect on their own presumptions and to develop a taste for the wide reading and research that must support appraisal.     

小学语文教学应用建构主义学习理论的几个问题

小学语文教学要关注小学生的个性特点, 不要把建构主义学习理论当做一种学习模式;在设计教学目标时要考虑学生,教学目标要有层次性;在基于问题式学习中设计的问题要避免浅表化和片面化, 情境的设计要有利于学生的探究。     

国际学科教学知识的文献计量研究

学科教学知识(PCK)自舒尔曼1986年提出以来,受到了广泛关注。通过在Web of Science核心合集中对"PCK"进行文献计量研究,辅以CiteSpace进行关键词共现等分析,可以从整体上了解国际PCK的研究现状、研究热点与研究前沿问题。通过分析发现,在研究方法上,文献计量方法的综合使用有利于形成科学而准确的结论;在研究内容上,国际PCK的研究热点与研究前沿特征词较相似,体现了创新研究的不足。     

基于知识转化的工程人才创新能力提升研究——以一门综合创新实验课程的教学为例

随着技术系统、生产过程以及产品系统复杂性的增长,创新活动要求不同知识与技术的整合,工程人才的系统创新能力是应对创新复杂性增长的有效途径。本文从知识转化的研究视角出发,发现工程人才能力的提升可以通过结构化的知识获取和转化路径来实现,逐步建构起整合性的多维度创新能力。文章亦提出在高校或企业的工程师培养过程中,可以通过提供多元知识环境、设计知识获取的组合结构,保护工程人才的创新灵感,从而建构有效实现知识获取和转化的系统运转机制,达成工程师自我成长的机制。     

Enhancing Research Impact in Heritage Conservation

This paper examines how research impact is defined, measured, and generated – with a view to understanding how it can be enhanced within heritage conservation. It examines what is meant by ‘impact’ and how it can be promoted within heritage science through effective inter-disciplinary collaboration. Following a general examination of the current discourse concerning research impact, the study examined: (i) active research networks within heritage science; (ii) research planning and evaluation practices within heritage science; and (iii) the experiences of users (i.e. conservators and other heritage professionals) within research collaborations. Terminologies surrounding the notion of impact and the various phases of the research process were reviewed – from the initial identification of a knowledge gap to the eventual application of new findings in practice. Next, the reach and diversity of research collaborations (as identified through publication co-authorship) were studied to characterise the inter-disciplinary nature of heritage science and its connectedness to users. Findings showed substantial growth in international research collaborations over recent years, predominantly involving academic- and research-oriented institutions – although the engagement of heritage institutions has proportionally decreased. In addition, a worldwide survey of institutional planning and evaluation practices revealed a general reliance on processes driven by the interests of researchers – the systematic consideration of stakeholder opinion and evaluation of research outcomes being less common. Finally, a series of semi-structured interviews with senior heritage professionals explored their experience of collaborative research. The results identified key areas where strategic support is needed to promote user participation and enhance impact. These include training for research readiness, engagement, and impact for both researchers and users; better methods for needs and outcome assessment; affordable open access options and greater diversity of knowledge exchange opportunities. Finally, the need for ethical guidelines for responsible research, and greater emphasis on non-academic impact within research rating systems are discussed.     

科研领域重点研究方向判别方法研究

[目的/意义] 判别重点研究方向对科研管理和科技政策的制定有着重要参考价值,已有的定量方法多是根据创新性、新颖性以及增长性等特征属性设计指标进行识别、推荐,本研究进一步利用研究方向间的关联关系,从网络拓扑结构和特征属性两个维度判别重点研究方向。[方法/过程] 在构建领域文献引用网络的基础上,利用大规模网络聚类算法识别研究方向,并构建研究方向关联网络,利用网络重要节点识别算法从网络拓扑结构的角度判别重点研究方向,同时结合新颖性、增长性和H指数三个特征属性指标,构建了重点研究方向遴选指标体系。[结果/结论] 对纳米科技领域进行实证分析,经专家判读,认为加权PageRank、Gefura以及增长性指标更加具有客观性、全面性和稳定性,通过综合运用三个指标遴选出208个纳米科技领域的重点研究方向。     

基于LDA主题模型的学术谱系内知识传承研究——以谈家桢为核心的遗传学学术谱系为例

[目的/意义]学术谱系以知识传承的方式助推科学发展。研究知识传承特征,探索学术谱系传承模式及其学术产出影响效能,为探索人才成长规律及人才政策制定提供参考。[方法/过程]基于LDA主题模型,以遗传学领域谈家桢为核心的学术谱系成员发表的期刊文献为研究对象,对该谱系成员的研究主题进行抽取,借鉴生物学"遗传"与"变异"的概念,根据主题相似度将谱系成员划分为"遗传学者"变异学者"和"非遗传非变异学者",并对三种学者的学术绩效进行分析。[结果/结论]分析结果表明,谈家桢学术谱系内"遗传学者"和"变异学者"的学术绩效相对较高;"非遗传非变异学者"的数量占比最多,但学术绩效相对较低;"遗传学者"与"变异学者"在不同主题下的分布具有明显差异。