马克思主义中国化方法论的研究现状及述评

马克思主义中国化的方法论指的是推进马克思主义中国化实践进程或深化马克思主义中国化研究的一般方法的总称。近年来,学术界围绕着马克思主义中国化方法论的研究价值以及马克思主义中国化研究的哲学方法论、思想方法论、实践方法论、学科方法论等问题展开研究,取得了较大的成就,深化了马克思主义中国化的理论研究,拓展了马克思主义中国化研究的学科内涵。但学术界的研究也存在较大的局限性,需要我们在今后的研究中不断加以克服和创新。     

响应面法优化软包装风味鱼的加工工艺

采用响应面法优化了风味鱼的加工工艺参数.通过对盐渍时间、盐渍浓度、卤制时间以及杀菌温度和时间的研究,确定风味鱼块的加工方法为：新鲜鱼切块后,采用4%的食盐在常压下盐渍3.8h或真空下盐渍100min,清洗沥干,再用一定比例的调味液卤制89min,沥干后送入鼓风干燥箱中进行阶段干燥（温度为30℃,干燥30min,升温至50℃干燥30min,最后升至100℃干燥2h）,取出冷却后进行真空包装,在115℃-118℃的条件下杀菌20min,得到的软包装风味鱼具有外观好、香味浓郁、耐咀嚼等特点.     

高师化学教学论教学实施的调查与分析——以长治学院为例

利用自编的"高师化学教学论教学实施的调查问卷",对化学专业的300多名学生进行了调查,了解了化学教学论课程在具体的教学实施中存在的一些问题,提出了相应的建议,以促进化学教学论课程的改革。     

统筹兼顾方法研究述评

统筹兼顾是科学发展的根本方法.试图对统筹兼顾方法的研究成果作一个粗浅的梳理,从历史发展顺序和逻辑结构相结合的角度对统筹兼顾方法的哲学基础、理论渊源、价值特色及用以解决的主要矛盾和问题进行了探讨,以避免目前单纯按照历史发展顺序进行研究的局限.     

案例教学法在高等师范院校《英语教学法》教学中的应用

随着基础教育新课程改革和义务教育经费保障机制改革的全面实施,基础教育教师的素质及专业发展,已成为社会各界关注的焦点。高等师范院校《英语教学法》在师范教育课程设置中占有重要地位,许多师范院校正在进行师范课程的整改,以培养具有先进教学理念的创新型教师。应采用案例教学模式,选取合适的教学案例进行课堂分析、讨论与实践,通过探究性学习方式的运用,使英语师范生从表面层次的理论知识学习向深层次上的教学理念的形成,进而为其教师职业技能的发展奠定良好的基础。     

论新制度学派企业理论方法论的局限性

以新制度学派为代表的新自由主义企业理论方法论存在三方面的根本缺陷:以个人主义方法论作为企业理论研究的基础;把"新经济人"假设作为研究出发点;采用静态比较的方法,把企业问题仅仅置于交换领域中研究.因此,新自由主义企业理论方法论从根本上看是不科学的.     

《湖南农民运动考察报告》中思想政治教育的方法论意蕴

《湖南农民运动考察报告》在毛泽东的众多著作中占据极其显著的地位,它不仅包含着丰富的具体理论和内容,也蕴含着深邃的方法论思想。从思想政治教育视角剖析《湖南农民运动考察报告》可以发现其蕴含着丰富的方法论思想,例如调查研究方法、注重群众力量工作方法、具体问题具体分析方法、问题意识以及创新思维的工作方法等等。认真学习和领会这些方法对于今后一个时期做好思想政治教育工作具有重要的方法论借鉴意义。     

我国图书馆学研究方法的现状与思考

文章主要从我国图书馆学的研究方法入手,对研究方法的历史与现状进行了分析,并着重对目前我国图书馆学研究方法中存在的问题提出了参考性的建议。     

Comfort assessment of running footwear: Does assessment type affect inter-session reliability?

Assessing comfort of running footwear reliably is challenging. The purpose of this study was to compare the intra-rater reliability between different assessment types, to calculate intra-individual reliability scores and to evaluate the effect of rater selection based on individual reliability scores on group level reliability. Three assessment types: ranking, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Likert Scale (LS) were provided twice in six separate sessions among 30 participants, who assessed comfort of five shoes after treadmill running. Spearman's rho provided an evaluation of inter-session relative reliability and typical error as a measure of absolute reliability for each assessment type. Ranking (r?=?0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61–0.78) yielded the highest relative reliability for overall comfort, followed by VAS (r?=?0.67, 95% CI 0.56–0.75) and LS (r?=?0.63, 95% CI 0.52–0.72), with large-scale overlaps of CIs between assessment types. The same order of assessment types was found for the percentage of reliable raters (r?≥?0.7) with 60% in ranking scale, 47% in VAS and 37% in LS. Forming subgroups corresponding to the intra-individual reliability substantially increased group level reliabilities. Based on measures of relative reliability, an extreme reduction in resolution as provided by the ranking from pairwise comparisons seems to be a valuable tool in footwear comfort assessments if assessment time is of minor importance. No preference can be provided for the two investigated rating scales. Besides the assessment type, a selection of the best raters in additional reliability checks seems to be a prerequisite for further comfort-related studies.     

‘We Have to Go Where the Money Is’—Dilemmas in the Role of Nutrition Scientists: An Interview Study

In Western societies scientists are increasingly expected to seek media exposure and cooperate with industry. Little attention has been given to the way such expectations affect the role of scientific experts in society. To investigate scientists’ own perspectives on these issues eight exploratory, in-depth interviews were conducted in Denmark with reputable nutrition scientists. Additionally, eight interviews were held with ‘key informants’ from the field of nutrition policy. It was found that nutrition scientists experience two dilemmas: first, between their aspiration to make a collective impact on public health and the powerful incentives of each to appear frequently in the media with new messages; second, between their need to cooperate with the food industry for financial reasons and their fear that this may compromise their independence and scientific integrity. It is argued that the dilemmas identified in this study should be dealt with openly by the relevant groups of scientists.