释家儒生：“三言”中的“士人信仰”

中国的宗教自来受外来影响颇多,其中,以＂禅＂之一字,最为盛行。在晚明时期,中国的知识分子中,已然形成了用禅的理论来完善儒家的说教,再用儒家的正统地位为禅鸣锣开道之风。换言之,即是形成了独特的士人信仰。在冯氏＂三言＂中可窥一斑。     

《论语·里仁》疑义章句解读

《论语·里仁》篇主要讲仁德的道理。本篇有许多经典名句,如"择不处仁,焉得知"、"父母在,不远游,游必有方"等等。如何解读这些名句,历来多有争议。本文在质疑朱熹《四书章句集注》和杨伯峻《论语译注》)的基础上,对《里仁》篇中的一些疑义章句进行了重新解读。     

学报编辑素质刍议

编辑工作的质量水平与编辑人员的素质具有密切关系。作为反映教育教学方面科研成果的学报,其编辑人员的素质与刊物水平的关系更是不可分割。大力提高学报编辑的素质是当前的重要任务。     

学术与利益的纠结：社科学报办刊体制批判

社科学报的理想前景就是形成一个＂专、特、大、强＂的办刊格局,且以走＂整合＂、＂联合＂或＂内涵发展＂之路来实现此目标。规划前景是美好的,但在办刊实践中却不易实现。受整个知识生产体制和自身办刊体制的制约,在现行学术评价体制下,社科学报不仅渐渐演变成了一种提供统计研究者知识产品之指标的形式制度,而且在知识出版方式、知识生产方式与知识生产类型上为各种利益所规制,从而在一定意义上丧失了推进和引领我国学术发展的实质性作用。既然如此,期刊体制改革当以一种符合其整体构想的思路为切入点,解析办刊背后因学术与利益间的纠结而导致的转型困境与功能困境,并阐明引发办刊机制变异的制度诱因,可能会更为合理也更有说服力。     

Bibliometric profile of top-cited single-author articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded

In this study, we identified and analyzed characteristics of top-cited single-author articles published in the Science Citation Index Expanded from 1991 to 2010. A top-cited single-author article was defined as an article that had been cited at least 1000 times from the time of its publication to 2012. Results showed that 1760 top-cited single-author articles were published in 539 journals listed in 130 Web of Science categories between 1901 and 2010. The top productive journal was Science and the most productive category was multidisciplinary physics. Most of the articles were not published in high-impact journals. Harvard University led all other institutions in publishing top-cited single-author articles. Nobel Prize winners contributed 7.0% of articles. In total, 72 Nobel Prize winners published 124 single-author articles. Single-authored papers published in different periods exhibited different patterns of citation trends. However, top-cited articles consistently showed repetitive peaks regardless of the time period of publication. “Theory (or theories)” was the most frequently appeared title word of all time. Leading title words varied at different time periods, and only five title words, method(s), protein(s), structure(s), molecular, and quantum consistently remained in the top 20 in different time periods.     

新旧唐书太宗本纪的同义形式比较分析

《旧唐书》成书于五代后晋,而《新唐书》编写于北宋,是在《旧唐书》的基础上改写而成的。文章从修辞学同义形式研究的角度入手,选取新旧唐书太宗本纪,对其中的同义形式进行比较分析。与《旧唐书》对比,《新唐书》对一些词语进行了同义替换,较多地运用单音节词语,同义语法形式的选择、广义借代、信息减省和省略使《新唐书》的叙述更为简洁。     

Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers

Although learning to write for publication is an important outcome of doctoral education, it has received surprisingly little scholarly attention. Within a socialization and supervisor pedagogy framework, this study uses narratives of faculty who regularly write with their doctoral students for publication to expose challenges students commonly encounter in the writing process. Common challenges include international students' ‘writing problem’, misconstruing the nature of disciplinary writing and not realizing that ‘public’ is part of publication.     

微书评在高校图书馆图书采访中的应用探析

图书采访是高校图书馆开展各环节工作的基础,是高校教学科研工作顺利开展的后台保障。网络环境下高校图书馆图书采访面临高校读者需求的无限扩展与图书采访传统途径狭窄,传统服务容量有限之间的矛盾,文章论述了微书评应对目前矛盾的优势以及微书评在高校图书采访中的应用途径。     

Using a Blended Group Learning Approach to Increase Librarians’ Motivation and Skills to Publish

While there is considerable research on interventions to support academic staff in writing for publication, there is limited literature on writing interventions for librarians. This article explores the potential of a blended learning approach to support librarians to develop the motivation and skills to write for publication. The program combines three elements: a formal writing seminar; a structured series of online exercises and mentoring support; and two peer-feedback days. The article suggests that the combination of online and face-to-face activities has the potential to be a sustainable model for helping to develop librarians as academic writers. It suggests that this type of model could provide a context, which is currently lacking, for librarians to develop their identity and skills as academic writers.     

Slavica Publishers: Fifty Years of Service to the Slavic Field

ABSTRACT

Slavica Publishers has played an important role in the fields of Slavic languages and literatures and Slavic area studies for 50 years. This article provides a brief history of the publishing house, focusing on key book and journal publications; the transition in 1997 from closely held privately owned corporation to not-for-profit status as a unit of Indiana University; evolution from predominately self-produced authors’ CRC to professionally typeset and edited volumes; and plans to keep Slavica relevant in the future. It is implicit that Slavica might serve as a model for other struggling small academic presses in this time of rapid change and chaos in scholarly publishing.