论乡镇万册馆的巩固与发展

论文在对南京市六合区乡镇图书馆进行调查的基础上,分析了目前乡镇图书馆存在的问题,并提出解决问题的方法.     

宝山社区图书馆协作网发展初探

论文对宝山社区图书馆协作网的发展现状进行了分析和探讨。该协作网是以互联网为依托、以图书配送为手段的新型图书馆模式，创办2年来已成功组建起由区图书馆、乡镇街道图书馆和小区分馆构成的覆盖全区的资源共建共享服务体系。     

权利与道德--关于公共图书馆精神的阐释

文章通过对公共图书馆发展历史的剖析,概括了公共图书馆的历史精神——公共、公开、公享;通过对《联合国教科文组织公共图书馆宣言》的分析,认为应该从4个方面去理解民众的图书馆权利,即:人类社会的基本价值、公共图书馆的基本社会价值、人人享有平等利用图书馆的权利、人人享有自由利用图书馆的权利;并总结了图书馆员应该具备的职业道德观念。     

图书馆在著作权问题上的理念、权利与行动

分析了我国著作权保护的总体形势,强调了图书馆活动对待著作权的基本理念,概述了国外图书馆界在著作权博弈过程中采取的立场和行动,提出了中国图书馆界在著作权问题上可以和应该行使的权利     

美、英、加、日、韩、俄等国图书情报教育的特色及其给我们的启示

美、英、加、日、韩、俄等国家的图书情报教育颇有特色,主要表现在:图书情报教育与图书馆职业资格认证制度相辅相成;强调培育自己的专业特色;设计模块化的课程结构;重视儿童与中小学图书馆人才的培养;对研究生的教育方式比较灵活;贯彻“改革、创新”的办学理念。     

专题：科技信息的开发获取（一）[张晓林编委组织]

科技信息的开放获取已成为影响学术信息交流与科学发展的重大问题，深刻地影响到科技政策、科技支撑环境发展战略和科技信息服务模式。一大批科学家、科研机构和许多国家的科学管理与科研资助机构，都积极地推动科技信息的开放获取。他们或者制定开放获取政策、要求或鼓励科研人员提供科研成果的开放获取，或者支持开放出版期刊，或者建立机构开放存储库、支持本机构科研成果开放获取。通过这一系列的措施，科学界希望能够促进科研成果不受限制地广泛传播和自由获取、以及促进科研成果通过公共机制长期可靠保存和利用，以保障科技知识资产的国家保护和科研机构的知识资产管理。     

民国出版界与图书馆界的互动及影响——以出版人张元济的图书馆事业为中心考察

文章以出版人张元济的图书馆事业为中心,通过对张元济参与图书馆事业的历程以及其图书馆理念与实践的考察,窥探民国出版界与图书馆界的互动及影响,最后指出,两个看似"跨界"的界别同属特殊的"文化事业"行业,需要紧密合作才能实现共赢,而至今缺乏的就是缺少张元济式的人,一个真正以"文化精神"办"文化事业"的知识分子群体。     

发挥青年编辑优势 提高高校学报审稿效率

由于高校学报来稿研究领域广泛、涵盖学科众多、稿源范围综合等特点,所需审稿专家范围广且重复度较低,“审稿难”问题日益凸显。作为高校学报骨干力量的青年编辑,通常需要专业基础扎实、思维活跃、应变能力强。本文结合自身工作,从青年编辑特点和优势出发,有针对性地提出了一些措施,从熟悉专业、抓住机会、修炼自身等几个方面,阐述如何发挥青年编辑优秀,提高高校学报审稿效率。     

Tools and Principles for Effective Online Library Instruction: Andragogy and Undergraduates

The library literature evaluating the efficacy of online tutorial methods and delivery tools is a valuable resource for librarians looking for information to inform their choices for developing asynchronous online instruction. This literature, however, examines a wide variety of delivery tools, methods, and student populations. As a result, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about any one tutorial tool or method. This article compares selected research and concludes that the consensus in the literature suggests that applying adult learning principles to library tutorials has a larger impact on effective online instruction than the individual tool.     

Technological research in the EU is less efficient than the world average. EU research policy risks Europeans’ future

We have studied the efficiency of research in the EU by a percentile-based citation approach that analyzes the distribution of country papers among the world papers. Going up in the citation scale, the frequency of papers from efficient countries increases while the frequency from inefficient countries decreases. In the percentile-based approach, this trend, which is uniform at any citation level, is measured by the e_p index that equals the P_{top 1%}/P_{top 10%} ratio. By using the e_p index we demonstrate that EU research on fast-evolving technological topics is less efficient than the world average and that the EU is far from being able to compete with the most advanced countries. The e_p index also shows that the USA is well ahead of the EU in both fast- and slow-evolving technologies, which suggests that the advantage of the USA over the EU in innovation is due to low research efficiency in the EU. In accord with some previous studies, our results show that the European Commission’s ongoing claims about the excellence of EU research are based on a wrong diagnosis. The EU must focus its research policy on the improvement of its inefficient research. Otherwise, the future of Europeans is at risk.