Reference and PDF-Manager Software: Complexities,Support and Workflow

In the past, librarians taught reference management by training library users to use established software programs such as RefWorks or EndNote. In today's environment, there is a proliferation of Web-based programs that are being used by library clientele that offer a new twist on the well-known reference management programs. Basically, these new programs are PDF-manager software (e.g., Mendeley or Papers). Librarians are faced with new questions, issues, and concerns, given the new workflows and pathways that these PDF-manager programs present. This article takes a look at some of those.     

从荷兰《阀门世界》杂志看行业期刊的发展

荷兰<阀门世界>杂志的经营模式及其市场定位、读者定位、发行定位和内容定位值得我国行业期刊借鉴.     

基于学术社交网络的文献阅读及学科关注点差异研究

[目的/意义] 对不同学术社交网络中不同学科用户的文献阅读差异进行分析,以了解在不同学术社交网络中的学科分布情况,掌握在不同学术社交网络中的学科研究热点。[方法/过程] 通过Altmetric. com获取24个学科的4 800篇热点文献,利用爬虫采集这些文献在Mendeley和ResearchGate的被阅读次数,再对文献进行内容分析,得到关键词,最后对比分析不同学术社交网络中文献阅读差异以及学科关注热点的一致性。[结果/结论] 不同学科的读者身份、读者所属领域具有显著差异,ResearchGate中的文献阅读次数普遍高于Mendeley,且社会科学等软学科的文献阅读相对优势更为明显,而物理学等硬学科的文献阅读相对优势较低。Mendeley和ResearchGate在地球与地理科学、化学和环境科学等学科中的关注热点具有较高的一致性,而物理学等部分学科中的关注热点表现出较低的一致性。     

重视科技期刊作者与读者的关系

我国出版事业的4项基本任务中,首要的一项就是"传播和积累有益于提高民族素质、有益于经济发展和社会进步的科学技术和文化知识"[1].一本受读者欢迎的好杂志,必须有高水平的编辑工作,他们能够按市场需求和读者兴趣选题,在当前选择性高度自由的前提下,使杂志成为读者愿意看并企盼的读物.     

《荒原》用典辨

我国读者应根据《荒原》现代主义作品的文本性质 ,根据诗人的创作倾向及其所属流派和相关流派的创作倾向 ,运用现代文艺理论更新自己的阅读视角 ,调整期待视域。唯此 ,才能一定程度上弥合SSSHE自己与该诗的理想读者之间的差距 ,才能解读出《荒原》用典的必然性、必要性及其重要的文学、美学价值     

Do females create higher impact research? Scopus citations and Mendeley readers for articles from five countries

There are known gender imbalances in participation in scientific fields, from female dominance of nursing to male dominance of mathematics. It is not clear whether there is also a citation imbalance, with some claiming that male-authored research tends to be more cited. No previous study has assessed gender differences in the readers of academic research on a large scale, however. In response, this article assesses whether there are gender differences in the average citations and/or Mendeley readers of academic publications. Field normalised logged Scopus citations and Mendeley readers from mid-2018 for articles published in 2014 were investigated for articles with first authors from India, Spain, Turkey, the UK and the USA in up to 251 fields with at least 50 male and female authors. Although female-authored research is less cited in Turkey (?4.0%) and India (?3.6%), it is marginally more cited in Spain (0.4%), the UK (0.4%), and the USA (0.2%). Female-authored research has fewer Mendeley readers in India (?1.1%) but more in Spain (1.4%), Turkey (1.1%), the UK (2.7%) and the USA (3.0%). Thus, whilst there may be little practical gender difference in citation impact in countries with mature science systems, the higher female readership impact suggests a wider audience for female-authored research. The results also show that the conclusions from a gender analysis depend on the field normalisation method. A theoretically informed decision must therefore be made about which normalisation to use. The results also suggest that arithmetic mean-based field normalisation is favourable to males.     

接受美学视野下的网络文学发展初探

在信息化背景下,网络文学逐步兴起并迅速发展,打破了传统文学的诸多模式,并收获大批忠实读者。经过分析可以看出,网络文学蓬勃发展的原因来自于其特点与它的读者接受群的审美特点契合,读者在文学接受和创造过程中地位及作用的提高与作者形成循环互动的模式,利用读者群体具有从众效应的心理来获得关注度,其衍生产品令读者群获得极高自我认同感和满足感。最后结合网络文学的发展分析其未来发展可能出现的问题并提出相应的解决方案。     

Rivers of reading: Using critical incident collages to learn about adolescent readers and their readership

This article arises from a study of 12–13 year-old habitual and committed readers. The research foregrounds the sociocultural and spatial dimensions of their reading, exploring how encounters with other readers and different reading practices contribute to their readership. Many reading researchers favour survey-style methodology, whilst acknowledging the need to explore young people’s reading in greater depth. The design of this research therefore involves different research methods. The article focuses on one of these methods which requires readers to create critical incident collages of their reading histories. I argue that it generates valuable data for both researchers and teachers and encourages a more intricate view of the complexity of reading.