浅析《公司法》修改后的公司治理结构

我国《公司法》虽几经修改,但有关调整公司治理结构的法律规范仍有诸多不足,应从以下几方面加以完善：推动企业产权主体的多元化;推进政府与企业的实质分开;发挥＂新三会＂与＂老三会＂的作用;完善职业经理人制度;完善授权经营的国有资产制度。     

Chapter 2. Governing Policies for Interlibrary Loan

Abstract

ILL activity is governed by local, state, and national agreements and codes. Chapter 2 discusses the importance of national and statewide ILL codes of conduct, and also covers laws and regulations (confidentiality, the PATRIOT Act, HIPAA) germane to interlibrary loan.     

Procedures to Follow if a Law Enforcement Official Asks for Patron Information: A Checklist for Access Services Student Employees

ABSTRACT

Since the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act was signed into law in October, 2001, library administrators have become increasingly concerned that staff–especially student employees–continue to protect the confidentiality of patron records. Administrators have also become increasingly concerned that when law enforcement officials provide paperwork giving them legal access to patron records, staff take steps both to divulge no more information than is necessary and to protect the institution from liability. In response to these concerns, the University of Colorado, Boulder, created an easy-to-understand and easy-to-use document for its public services student employees. This article describes the process by which that document was created, how it was introduced to staff and student employees, and what additional steps are planned for the future. Finally, the document itself is included as a possible model for other institutions that may wish to create procedural guidelines for student employees.     

Applications of Computers in the Legal Profession A Selected Bibliography

No abstract available for this article.     

Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model

The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 provided U.S. universities with the right to commercialize employees’ inventions made while engaged in government-funded research. This paper argues that the current university invention ownership model, in which universities maintain de jure ownership of inventions, is not optimal either in terms of economic efficiency or for advancing the social interest of rapidly commercializing technology and encouraging entrepreneurship. We argue that this model is plagued by ineffective incentives, information asymmetries, and contradictory motivations for the university, the inventors, potential licensees, and university technology licensing offices (TLOs). These structural uncertainties can lead to delays in licensing, misaligned incentives among parties, and obstacles to the flow of scientific information and the materials necessary for scientific progress. The institutional arrangements within which TLOs are embedded have encouraged some of them to become revenue maximizers, rather than facilitators of technology dissemination for the good of the entire society.We suggest two alternative invention commercialization models as superior alternatives. The first alternative is to vest ownership with the inventor, who could choose the commercialization path for the invention. For this privilege the inventor would provide the university an ownership stake in any returns to the invention. The inventor would be free to contract with the university TLO or any other entity that might assist in commercialization. The second alternative is to make all inventions immediately publicly available through a public domain strategy or, through a requirement that all inventions be licensed non-exclusively. Both alternatives would address the current dysfunctional arrangements in university technology commercialization.     

论塞尔的间接言语行为理论及语言哲学观

言语行为理论由奥斯汀提出,经塞尔的完善与发展,已成为哲学、语言学的重要研究课题,更是现代语用学的核心内容之一。塞尔的间接言语行为理论从使用和交际的角度研究语言的意义,为认识言外之力的本质提供了独到的解释方法。塞尔关注语言和心智的关系,认为意义必须联系存在于言语行为中的意向性来解释。探讨了塞尔的间接言语行为及其所蕴含的语言哲学观。     

高校招生考试法治论纲

法治招考意味着普通高校招生考试领域的一系列思想变革和行为模式改变,不是简单地"加大招生考试立法的力度"可以概括的。高校招生考试法治的基本内容离不开各个主体以及社会的参与,其基本问题是在高校招生考试领域,如何实现权力的监督与制约。当前法治招考的现实要求则是建立新的《高校招生考试法》。     

论美国大学与联邦实验室技术转移政策的差异

美国市场主导型的大学与政府主导型的联邦实验室在技术转移中的差异性直接映射在科技政策中,1980年《史蒂文森——怀德勒技术创新法》与《拜杜法案》分别确立了联邦实验室与大学技术转移的核心制度,前者在于"设定义务",后者在于"下放权利",虽然二者不断交叉与融合,但仍保持制度内在逻辑的差异性。我国的法律移植过程,忽视了高等学校、国立科研机构与美国大学、联邦实验室的差异,忽视了美国技术转移政策之间的差异。美国的经验对我国"拜杜规则"的完善、国立科研机构的建设具有启示意义。