论科技期刊编辑出版中的交流

搞好科技期刊编辑出版工作中的交流,有利于发现自身的问题,提高编辑人员的素质和办刊水平,同时这种交流还能使期刊之间达到信息资源共享的目的.该文论述多种层次期刊交流的方法和形式.     

高校图书馆员与读者的有效沟通探析

通过分析指出馆员的职业素养、馆员与读者掌握的信息不对称和读者的心理状态等方面影响了图书馆员与读者之沟通,提出通过拓宽沟通渠道,扩大沟通范围,使馆员与读者进行有效沟通。     

文化全球化中的公共图书馆

文化全球化是当今世界的大趋势,如何在国际文化交流中宣传本国文化,同时又更好地吸收外来优秀文化,为我所用,是新时期我们面临的一大课题.笔者由德国文化机构与中国公共图书馆的合作得到启发,阐释了公共图书馆在文化全球化进程中的重要作用及其在国际文化交流中的工作思路.     

开放存取期刊出版的发展现状及其影响分析

通过调研分析，指出开放存取(OA)期刊目前呈现出良好的发展态势，其规模与影响力不断扩大，有多种出版形式。同时，深入分析OA期刊出版对当前学术交流系统中的各利益关系方（包括科研人员、传统出版机构、图书馆和科研资助机构）所产生的积极影响。     

开放存取:学术信息交流的新模式

开放存取是一种全新的学术交流模式。文章分析了开放存取出版产生的历史背景、基本特征、实现模式等，并就开放存取过程中出现的相关问题和发展前景进行了初浅探讨。     

图书情报学与传播学理论交叉研究综述

在调研近十几年传播学与图书情报学交叉研究论文的基础上，对传播学与图书情报学的学科比较研究、学科交叉研究等方面进行综述，并对发展趋势作出预测。     

网络时代科学信息传播与利用的模式浅析

简述和分析了网络时代科学信息传播的三种模式，并指出读者如何选择适合自己的模式来更好地获取科学信息。     

传播图景中的制度——由英尼斯的媒介理论谈起

本文分三部分 ,第一部分认为 ,在英尼斯的媒介理论中 ,对制度层面的论述是单向和不充分的 ,需要给予补充。第二部分对审视传播媒介与制度系统关系的各种理论视角做了归纳和解释。第三部分提出传播现象的制度分析框架 ,并以舆论的形成为例进行了分析。作者认为传播制度对于传播媒介和社会生活的正常运转具有重要意义 ,并通过制度分析提供了一种可以“去魅”的解释。     

On the same page: Improving the connection between public services units in academic libraries

Communication quality between public service units in academic libraries can make the difference between mediocre and exceptional service. If units do not communicate well, patrons may receive inaccurate information and experience short-term frustration, leading to long-term damage to the library's reputation. Poor communication creates adverse effects on employees through decreased productivity, negative work culture, and low morale. This article explores the importance of quality communication through a review of the literature and a case study at one academic library. The authors share practical communication improvement strategies for libraries of every size and fiscal ability.     

Bibliometric approximation of a scientific specialty by combining key sources,title words,authors and references

Bibliometric methods for the analysis of highly specialized subjects are increasingly investigated and debated. Information and assessments well-focused at the specialty level can help make important decisions in research and innovation policy. This paper presents a novel method to approximate the specialty to which a given publication record belongs. The method partially combines sets of key values for four publication data fields: source, title, authors and references. The approach is founded in concepts defining research disciplines and scholarly communication, and in empirically observed regularities in publication data. The resulting specialty approximation consists of publications associated to the investigated publication record via key values for at least three of the four data fields. This paper describes the method and illustrates it with an application to publication records of individual scientists. The illustration also successfully tests the focus of the specialty approximation in terms of its ability to connect and help identify peers. Potential tracks for further investigation include analyses involving other kinds of specialized publication records, studies for a broader range of specialties, and exploration of the potential for diverse applications in research and research policy context.